It is demonstrated that family policies are an important aspect of the institutional context of earnings inequality among coupled households. Although seldom integrated into prominent analyses of economic inequality, women’s earnings are consistently found to reduce relative inequality among households. This means that family policies, as well-known determinants of women’s employment and earnings, are important contextual determinants of economic inequality. Using Luxembourg Income Study data from 18 OECD countries in the period 1981–2008, this study demonstrates that women have higher earnings, and that their earnings reduce inequality among coupled households more in institutional contexts with generous paid leave and public childcare. We found no sizeable association between financial support policies, such as family allowances and tax benefits to families with children, and the degree to which women’s earnings contribute to inequality among coupled households. Family policy arrangements that facilitate women’s employment and earnings are associated with less economic inequality among coupled households.
AndringaWNieuwenhuisRVan GervenM (2015) Women’s working hours: The interplay between gender role attitudes, motherhood, and public childcare support in 23 European countries. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy35(9/10): 582–599.
2.
AtkinsonAB (2015) Inequality: What can be done?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BernsteinJ (2016) Wages in the United States: Trends, explanations and solutions. In: KirschIBraunH (eds) The Dynamics of Opportunity in America. Evidence and Perspectives. London and New York: Springer.
4.
BlauFDKahnLM (2000) Gender differences in pay. The Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 75–99.
5.
BousheyHDeLongJBSteinbaumM (eds) (2017) After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BradleyK (2000) The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical outcomes?Sociology of Education73(1): 1–18.
7.
BrownR (2017) The Inequality Crisis: The Facts and What We Can Do About It. Bristol: Policy Press.
8.
CancianMReedD (1999) The impact of wives’ earnings on income inequality: Issues and estimates. Demography36(2): 173–184.
9.
CancianMSchoeniRF (1998) Wives’ earnings and the level and distribution of married couples’ earnings in developed countries. Journal of Income Distribution8(1): 45–61.
10.
CantillonBGhyselsJMusscheNVan DamR (2001) Female employment differences, poverty and care provisions. European Societies3(4): 447–469.
11.
CharlesM (2011) A world of difference: International trends in women’s economic status. Annual Review of Sociology37(1): 355–371.
12.
CostaD (2000) From mill town to board room: The rise of women’s paid labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 101–122.
13.
EnglandP (2010) The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society24(2): 149–166.
14.
Esping-AndersenG. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
EydalGBGíslasonIVRostgaardTBrandthBDuvanderA-ZLammi-TaskulaJ (2015) Trends in parental leave in the Nordic countries: Has the forward march of gender equality halted?Community, Work and Family18(2): 167–181.
16.
GauthierAH (1996) The State and the Family. A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GhyselsJVan LanckerW (2011) The unequal benefits of activation: an analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children. Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 472–485.
19.
GoldinC (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter †. American Economic Review104(4): 1091–1119.
20.
GornickJCJänttiM (eds) (2013) Income inequality: Economic disparities and the middle class in affluent countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
GornickJCMeyersMK (2003): Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
22.
GornickJMeyersMRossK (1998) Public policies and the employment of mothers: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly79(1): 35–54.
23.
GregoryM (2009) Gender and economic inequality. In: SalverdaWNolanBSmeedingTM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press, pp. 284–312.
24.
HalldénKLevanonAKricheli-KatzT (2016) Does the motherhood wage penalty differ by individual skill and country family policy? A longitudinal study of ten European countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society23(3): 363–388.
25.
HarknessS (2013) Womens’ employment and household income inequality. In: GornickJCJänttiM (eds) Income Inequality: Economic Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 207–233.
26.
HegewischAGornickJC (2011) The impact of work–family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work and Family14(2): 119–138.
27.
JaehrlingKKalinaTMesarosL (2015) A paradox of activation strategies: Why increasing labour market participation among single mothers failed to bring down poverty rates. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society22(1): 86–110.
28.
JenkinsSPVan KermP (2009) The Measurement of Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
KaruMTremblayD-G (forthcoming) Fathers on parental leave: An analysis of rights and take-up in 29 countries. Community, Work and Family1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1346586
30.
KenworthyL (2008) Jobs With Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
KollmeyerC (2013) Family structure, female employment, and national income inequality: A cross-national study of 16 Western countries. European Sociological Review29(4): 816–827.
32.
KorpiW (2000) Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 7(2): 127–191. http://doi.org/10.1093/sp/7.2.127
33.
KorpiWFerrariniTEnglundS (2013) Women’s opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in Western countries re-examined. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society20(1): 1–40.
34.
LamD (1997) Demographic variables and income inequality. In: RosenzweigMStarkO (eds) Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1015–1059).
MandelH (2012) Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review28(2): 241–262.
37.
MandelH (2013) Up the down staircase: Women’s upward mobility and the wage penalty for occupational feminization, 1970–2007. Social Forces91(4): 1183–1207.
38.
MastekaasaABirkelundG (2011) The equalizing effect of wives’ earnings on inequalities in earnings among households: Norway 1974–2004. European Societies13(2): 219–237.
39.
MatysiakAVignoliD (2008) Fertility and women’s employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population24(4): 363–384.
40.
MilanovicB (2016) Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
NieuwenhuisRMaldonadoLC (2018) The Triple Bind of Single-parent Families: Resources, Employment and Policies to Improve Well-being. Bristol: Policy Press.
42.
NieuwenhuisRMunziTGornickJC (2017) Comparative research with net and gross income data: An evaluation of two netting down procedures for the LIS Database. Review of Income and Wealth63(3): 564–573.
43.
NieuwenhuisRNeedAVan Der KolkH (2012) Institutional and demographic explanations of women’s employment in 18 OECD countries, 1975–1999. Journal of Marriage and the Family74(3): 614–630.
44.
NieuwenhuisRVan der KolkHNeedA (2017) Women’s earnings and household inequality in OECD countries, 1973–2013. Acta Sociologica60(1): 3–20.
45.
OECD (2015) In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All, Paris: OECD.
OlivettiCPetrongoloB (2017) The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(1): 205–230.
48.
OppenheimerV (1988) A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology94(3): 563–591.
49.
OppenheimerV (1994) Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review20(2): 293–342.
50.
PasquaS (2002) Wives’ work and income distribution in European countries. European Journal of Comparative Economics5(2): 197–226.
51.
PettitBHookJL (2009) Gendered Tradeoffs: Family, Social Policy, and Economic Inequality in Twenty-One Countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
53.
RosseelY (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48(2): 1–36.
54.
SaracenoCKeckW (2011) Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities. Demographic Research25(11): 371–406.
55.
SweeneyM (2004) The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family66(November): 1015–1028.
56.
ThévenonO (2011) Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review37(1): 57–87.
57.
ThévenonOLuciA (2012) Reconciling work, family and child outcomes: What implications for family support policies?Population Research and Policy Review31(6): 855–882.
58.
Van der LippeTVan DijkL (2002) Comparative research on women’s employment. Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 221–241.
59.
Van LanckerWGhyselsJ (2012) Who benefits? The social distribution of subsidized childcare in Sweden and Flanders. Acta Sociologica55(2): 125–142.
