This paper studies the integration of migrant women in six European labour markets, highlighting how their migration penalty is related to the family’s migration dynamics and to the husband’s occupational condition. In order to compare the labour market outcomes of native and migrant women, Linear Probability Models are estimated using EU–LFS data. Results show that migrant women are penalized everywhere. However, in the Mediterranean labour markets their employment penalty is lower, while the penalty concerning job quality, conditional on employment, is relatively severe. Regarding the role of family migration, results show that: tied-movers women were disadvantaged with respect to both natives and other migrants; those migrants whose partners were unemployed or had low-quality jobs were more likely to find a job than those whose husbands had a good occupational condition. Both patterns were stronger in Mediterranean labour markets.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organizations. Gender & Society20(4): 441–464.
2.
AlbaRFonerN (2015) Integration’s challenges and opportunities in the wealthy West. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(1): 3–22.
3.
AignerDJCainGG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review30(2): 175–187.
4.
BallarinoGPanichellaN (2015a) The occupational integration of male migrants in Western European countries: Assimilation or persistent disadvantage?International Migration53(2): 338–352.
5.
BallarinoGPanichellaN (2015) Condizione occupazionale e dinamiche familiari delle donne immigrate in Italia. Quaderni di Sociologia6783–106.
6.
BallarinoGBaroneCPanichellaN (2016). Origini sociali e occupazione in Italia. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia57(1): 103–134.
7.
BeckerG (1971) The Economics of Discrimination, 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
8.
BeckerG (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Washington, DC: NBER.
9.
BernardiF (1999) Does the husband matter? Married women and employment in Italy. European Sociological Review15(3): 285–300.
10.
BernardiFGarridoLMiyarM (2011) The recent fast upsurge of immigrants in Spain and their employment patterns and occupational attainment. International Migration49(1): 148–187.
11.
BielbyWTBielbyD (1992) I will follow him: Family ties, gender–role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1241–1267.
12.
BorjasGJ (1994) The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature32: 1667–1717.
13.
BoydM (1984) At a disadvantage: The occupational attainments of foreign born women in Canada. International Migration Review18(4): 1091–1119.
14.
BoylePCookeTJHalfacreeKSmithD (2002) A cross-national study of the effects of family migration on women’s labour market status: Some difficulties with integrating microdata from two censusesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A165(Part 3): 465–480.
15.
BrekkeI (2013) How do husbands affect the labour market participation of majority and immigrant women?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(10): 1639–1657.
16.
BursteinP (1994) Equal Employment Opportunity. New York: Aldine.
17.
CohenPNBianchiSM (1999) Marriage, children, and women’s employment: What do we know?Monthly Labor Review122(12): 22–31.
18.
CollierP (2013) Exodus: Immigration and Multiculturalism in the 21st Century. New York: Allen Lane.
19.
CookeTJ (2008) Migration in a family way. Population, Space and Place14(4): 255–265.
20.
DaVanzoJ (1976) Difference between return and non-return migration: An econometric analysis. International Migration Review10(1): 13–27.
21.
DonatoKMPiyaBJacobsA (2014) The double disadvantage reconsidered: Gender, immigration, marital status and global labor force participation in the 21st Century. International Migration Review48(S1): S335–S376.
22.
DustmannC (2000) Temporary migration and economic assimilation. IZA Discussion Paper 186. Bonn: IZA.
23.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1992) The Constant Flux. A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
FullinGReyneriE (2011) Low unemployment and bad jobs for new immigrants in Italy. International Migration49(1): 118–147.
25.
GreenleesCSSaenzR (1999) Determinants of employment of recently arrived Mexican immigrant wives. International Migration Review33(2): 354–377.
26.
HakimC (2000) Work–Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
HeathACheungSY (2007) Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HeathARidgeJ (1983) Social mobility of ethnic minorities. Journal of Biosocial Science Supplement15(S8): 169–184.
30.
KalterFKoganI (2006) Ethnic inequalities at the transition from school to work in Belgium and Spain: Discrimination or self-exclusion?Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24(3): 259–274.
31.
KhoudjaYFleischmannF (2015) Labor force participation of immigrant women in The Netherlands: Do traditional partners hold them back?International Migration Review51(2): 506–541.
32.
KoganI (2007) Working Through Barriers: Host Countries’ Institutions and Immigrant Labour Market Performance in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
33.
KoopmansR (2016) Does assimilation work? Sociocultural determinants of labour market participation of European Muslims. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(2): 197–216.
34.
LindbeckASnowerD J (1988) The Insider–Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
MertonRK (1987) Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology13: 1–29.
36.
MolinaORhodesM (2007) The political economy of the adjustment in mixed market economies: A study of Spain and Italy. In: HanckéBRhodesMThatcherM (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflicts, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–252.
37.
MusumeciRSoleraC (2013) Women’s and men’s career interruptions in Europe: the role of social policies. In: FindingSKober-SmithA (eds) Politiques Familiales et Politiques d’Emploi « Genrées » au Royaume-Uni et en Europe: Observatoire de la Société Britannique14: 9–23.
38.
PedrazaS (1991) Women and migration: The social consequences of gender. Annual Review of Sociology17(1): 303–325.
39.
PetersenTPennerAMHøgsnesG (2014) From motherhood penalties to husband premia – the new challenge for gender equality and family policy: Lessons from Norway. American Journal of Sociology119(5): 1434–1472.
40.
ReyneriE (2001) Migrants involvement in irregular employment in the Mediterranean countries of the European Union. International Migration Papers 39. Geneva: ILO.
41.
ReyneriEFullinG (2011) Labour market penalties of new immigrants in new and old receiving West European Countries. International Migration49(1): 31–57.
42.
Ribas MateosN (2004) How can we understand immigration in Southern Europe?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies30(6): 1045–1063.
43.
RubinJRendallMRabinovichLTsangFJantaBvan Oranje-NassauC (2008) Migrant Women in the EU Labour Force: Current Situation and Future Prospects. Cambridge: Rand Corporation Europe.
44.
SchoeniRF (1998) Labour market assimilation of immigrant women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review51(3): 483–504.
45.
TaylorMP (2007) Tied migration and subsequent employment: Evidence from couples in Britain. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics69(6): 795–818.
46.
van TubergenFMaasIFlapH (2004) The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 Western societies: Origin, destination, and community effects. American Sociological Review69(5): 704–772.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
