The intersection of group dynamics and socioeconomic status theories is applied as a framework for the puzzling relationship of immigration and support for the welfare state in Western Europe. Group dynamics theories suggest that how individuals define their group boundaries moderates the impact of immigration on support for the welfare state. Immigrant presence should have the strongest effects for those with exclusive national group boundaries; weaker for those with conditionally inclusive boundaries based on reciprocity; and weakest or non-existent for those with inclusive group boundaries. Group boundaries should interact with material self-interest, leading individuals with less material security who are more likely to face social risks to be more supportive of the welfare state. Using data from the 4th European Social Survey linked to regional and national data, we find that group boundary salience plays a large moderating role in the relationship between immigration and native support for the welfare state, and that this role is intricately linked to material self-interest. Group dynamics should therefore be viewed in conjunction with existing structural welfare state theories as opposed to an alternative or isolated mechanism.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AlwinD (1989) Problems in the estimation and interpretation of the reliability of survey data. Quality and Quantity23(3–4): 277–331.
3.
AndreßH-JGolschKSchmidtAW (2013) Applied Panel Data Analysis for Economic and Social Surveys. Berlin: Springer.
4.
ArtsWGelissenJ (2001) Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?Acta Sociologica44(4): 283–299.
5.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
6.
BayA-HPedersenAW (2006) The limits of social solidarity: Basic income, immigration and the legitimacy of the universal welfare state. Acta Sociologica49(4): 419–436.
7.
BayA-HFinseraasHPedersenAW (2013) Welfare dualism in two Scandinavian welfare states: Public opinion and party politics. West European Politics36(1): 199–220.
8.
BeanCPapadakisE (1998) A comparison of mass attitudes towards the welfare state in different institutional regimes, 1985–1990. International Journal of Public Opinion Research10(3): 211–236.
9.
BlekesauneMQuadagnoJ (2003) Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review19(5): 415–427.
10.
BoboLLicariFC (1989) Education and political tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. The Public Opinion Quarterly53(3): 285–308.
11.
BoeriT (2010) Immigration to the land of redistribution. Economica77(308): 651–687.
12.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
13.
BraderTValentinoNASuhayE (2008) What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science52(4): 959–978.
14.
BradyD (2009) Rich Democracies, Poor People. How Politics Explains Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
BradyDFinniganR (2014) Does immigration undermine public support for social policy?American Sociological Review79(1): 17–42.
16.
BrewerMB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive–motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86(2): 307–324.
17.
BreznauN (2010) Economic equality and social welfare: Policy preferences in five nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research22(4): 458–484.
18.
BreznauN (2016) Secondary observer effects: Idiosyncratic errors in small-N secondary data analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology19(3): 301–318.
19.
BreznauNLykesVAKelleyJ. (2011) A clash of civilizations? Preferences for religious political leaders in 86 nations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(4): 671–691.
20.
BrubakerR (1996) Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
BurgoonBKosterFvan EgmondM (2012) Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy22(3): 288–304.
22.
CastlesFGMillerMJ (2003) The Age of Migration. New York: Guilford Press.
23.
DahlbergMEdmarkKLundqvistH (2012) Ethnic diversity and preferences for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy120(1): 41–76.
24.
DallingerU (2010) Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences?Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 333–349.
25.
EgerMA (2010) Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European Sociological Review26(2): 203–217.
26.
EgerMAValdezS (2015) Neo-nationalism in Western Europe. European Sociological Review31(1): 115–130.
27.
ESS4 (2008) European Social Survey Round 4. Stata Readable Datafile: European Social Survey. Availabe at:www.europeansocialsurvey.org.
28.
Eurostat (2014) Employment rates by NUTS region (%), [lfst_r_lfe2emprt]. Database: Regional employment – LFS annual series . Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed 10 April 2014).
29.
EvansMDRKelleyJ (2002) National pride in the developed world: Survey data from 24 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research14(3): 303–338.
30.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7(2): 117–140.
31.
FinseraasH (2012) Poverty, ethnic minorities among the poor, and preferences for redistribution in European regions. Journal of European Social Policy22(2): 164–180.
32.
FoxC (2004) The changing color of welfare? How whites’ attitudes toward Latinos influence support for welfare. The American Journal of Sociology110(3): 580–625.
33.
HabermasJ (2003) Toward a cosmopolitan Europe. Journal of Democracy14(4): 86–100.
34.
HasenfeldYRaffertyJA (1989) The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces67(4): 1027–1048.
35.
HjermM (2009) Anti-immigrant attitudes and cross-municipal variation in the proportion of immigrants. Acta Sociologica52(1): 47–62.
36.
HjermMSchnabelA (2012) How much heterogeneity can the welfare state endure? The influence of heterogeneity on attitudes to the welfare state. Nations and Nationalism18(2): 346–369.
37.
HoggMATurnerJC (1987) Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology52(4): 325–340.
HuberJD (1989) Values and partisanship in left-right orientations: Measuring ideology. European Journal of Political Research17(5): 599–621.
40.
InglehartRFlanaganSC (1987) Value change in industrial societies. The American Political Science Review81(4): 1289–1319.
41.
JægerMM (2006) What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: Self-interest or political ideology? A longitudinal approach. Acta Sociologica49(3): 321–338.
42.
KaufmannE (2008) The lenses of nationhood: An optical model of identity. Nations and Nationalism14(3): 449–477.
43.
KelleyJ (1990) The failure of a paradigm: Log-linear models of social mobility. In: ClarkJModgilCModgilS (eds) John H. Goldthorpe: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer, pp.319–346.
44.
KenworthyL (2004) Egalitarian Capitalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
LamontMMolnárV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 167–195.
46.
LandermanLRLandKCPieperCF (1997) An empirical evaluation of the predictive mean matching method for imputing missing values. Sociological Methods & Research26(1): 3–33.
47.
LuttmerEFP (2001) Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy109(3): 500–528.
48.
MauSBurkhardtC (2009) Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy19(3): 213–229.
49.
MauSMewesJZimmermannA (2008) Cosmopolitan attitudes through transnational social practices?Global Networks8(1): 1–24.
50.
MuddeC (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?European Journal of Political Research52(1): 1–19.
51.
MullenBBrownRSmithC (1992) Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology22(2): 103–122.
52.
NannestadP (2007) Immigration and welfare states: A survey of 15 years of research. European Journal of Political Economy23(2): 512–532.
53.
OECD (2009) Society at a Glance 2009: OECD Social Indicators. Available at: www.oecd.org (accessed 1 October 2012).
54.
OECD (2012) Social Expenditures Database. Available at: www.oecd.org (accessed 1 October 2012).
55.
PedhazurEJ (1997) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Predicton. New York: Harcourt Brace.
56.
PearlJ (2009) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
57.
PfeiferM (2009) Public opinion on state responsibility for minimum income protection: A comparison of 14 European countries. Acta Sociologica52(2): 117–134.
58.
PiersonP (2002) Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. Revue française de sociologie43(2): 369–406.
59.
PiersonPLeibfriedS (1995) Multitiered institutions and the making of social policy. In: LeibfriedSPiersonP (eds) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, pp.1–40.
60.
PriceV (1989) Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict. The Public Opinion Quarterly53(2): 197–224.
61.
PutnamRD (2007) E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30(2): 137–174.
62.
ReeskensTWrightM (2013) Nationalism and the cohesive society: A multilevel analysis of the interplay among diversity, national identity, and social capital across 27 European societies. Comparative Political Studies46(2): 153–181.
63.
ReicherS (2004) The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology25(6): 921–945.
RoosmaFGelissenJvan OorschotW (2013) The multidimensionality of welfare state attitudes: A European cross-national study. Social Indicators Research113(1): 235–255.
66.
RoosmaFvan OorschotWGelissenJ (2014) The preferred role and perceived performance of the welfare state: European welfare attitudes from a multidimensional perspective. Social Science Research44: 200–210.
67.
SchumacherGVisBvan KersbergenK (2013) Political parties’ welfare image, electoral punishment and welfare state retrenchment. Comparative European Politics11(1): 1–21.
68.
ShayoM (2009) A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review103(2): 147–174.
69.
StegmuellerD (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science57(3): 748–761.
70.
SvallforsS (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review13(3): 283–304.
71.
TajfelH (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American (November): 96–102.
72.
TajfelH (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33(1): 1–39.
73.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, p.49.
74.
TajfelHBilligMGBundyRP. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology1(2): 149–178.
75.
Taylor-GoobyP (2001) Sustaining state welfare in hard times: Who will foot the bill?Journal of European Social Policy11(2): 133–147.
76.
Taylor-GoobyP (2011) Security, equality and opportunity: Attitudes and the sustainability of social protection. Journal of European Social Policy21(2): 150–163.
77.
TurnerJC (1975) Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology5(1): 1–34.
78.
Van de SchootRLugtigPHoxJ (2012) A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology9(4): 486–492.
79.
Van OorschotWMeulemanB (2012) Welfarism and the multidimensionality of welfare state legitimacy: Evidence from the Netherlands, 2006. International Journal of Social Welfare21(1): 79–93.
80.
WlezienC (1995) The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science39(4): 981–1000.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
