As the Marxian project falls out of favour, scholars have therefore settled into some version of Weberianism or postmodernism, neither of which pays much attention to occupation-level structuration. We have outlined a quasi-Durheimian third road that refocuses attention on local forms of structuration within the division of labor. (Grusky & Weeden 2001:214)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez, R. M., Garrett, G. & Lange, P.1991. Government Partisanship. Labor Organization and Macroeconomic Performance. American Political Science Review.85, 539–556.
2.
Breen, R. 2001. A Rational Choice Model of Educational Inequality. Estudio 2001/166. Instituto Juan March, Madrid.
3.
Breen, R. & Goldthorpe, J. H.1997. Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. Rationality and Society.9, 275–305.
4.
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.
5.
Elster, J. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Erikson, R. & Goldthorpe, J. H.1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Evans, G. 1993. Class, Prospects and the Life-Cycle: Explaining the Association between Class Position and Political Preferences. Acta Sociologica.36, 263–276.
8.
Featherinan, D., Jones, F. L. & Hauser, R. M.1975. Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the US: the Case of Occupational Status. Social Science Research.4, 329–360.
9.
Giddens, A. 1973. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.
10.
Goldthorpe, J. H.1972. Class, Status and Party in Modern Britain: Some Recent Interpretations. Marxist and Marxisant. Archives européennes de sociologie.13, 342–372.
11.
Goldthorpe, J. H. (ed.) 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12.
Goldthorpe J. H.1987. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. 2nd ed.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
Goldthorpe, J. H.1990. Employment, Class and Mobility: A Critique of Liberal and Marxist Theories of Long-Term Change. In H. Haferkamp & N. J. Smelser (eds.). Modernazisation and Social Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Goldthorpe, J. H.1996. Class Analysis and the Reorientation of Class Theory: The Case of Persisting Differentials in Educational Attainment. British Journal of Sociology.47, 481–505.
15.
Goldthorpe, J. H.2000. On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Grusky, D. B & Sorensen, J. B.1998. Can Class Analysis be Salvaged?American journal of Sociology. 103, 1187–1234.
17.
Grusky, D. B. & Weeden, K. A.2001. Decomposition Without Death: A Research Agenda for a New Class Analysis. Acta Sociologica.44, 203–218.
18.
Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. (eds.) 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Iversen, T., Pontusson, J. & Soskice, D.2000. Unions, Employers and Central Banks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Lockwood, D. 1958. The Blackcoated Worker. London: Allen & Unwin.
21.
Popper, K. 1994. The Myth of the Framework. London: Routledge.
22.
Rose, D. & O'Reilly, K. (eds.) 1997. Constructing Classes: Towards a New Social Classification for the UK. London: and Office for National Statistics and Economic and Social Research Council.
23.
Rose, D. R.O'Reilly, K.1998. The ESRC Review of Govrenment Social Classifications. London: Office for National Statistics
24.
Schmitter, P. & Lehmibruch G. (eds.) 1979. Trends Towrards Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage.
25.
Willis, P. 1977. Learning to labour. Farnborough: Saxon House.
26.
Birkclund, G. E.1992. Stratification and Segregation. Acta Sociologica.35, 47–62.
27.
Birkelund, G. E., Goodman, L. A. & Rose, D.1996. The Latent Structure of Job Characteristics of Men and Women. American Journal of Sociology. 102, 80–113.
28.
Birkclund, G. E. & Overås, S.2001. Women and Union Democracy: Welcome as Members but not as Leaders? A Study of the Scandinavian Confederations of Labor. In J. Baxter & M. Western (eds.). Reconfigurations of Class and Gender, pp. 154–165. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
Bradley, H. 1996. Fractured Identities. Clanging Patterns of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Colbjornsen, T., Birkclund, G. E., Hemes, G. & Knudsen, K.1987. Klassesamfunnet på hell (The Decline of the Class Society). Bergen/Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
31.
Crompton, R. 1998. Class and Stratification. Oxford: Polity Press.
32.
Erikson, R. & Goldthorpe, J. H.1992. The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33.
Grusky, D. B. & Sorensen, J. B.1998. Can Class Analysis Be Salvaged?American Journal of Sociology. 103, 1187–1234.
34.
Grusky, D. B. & Weeden, K. A.2001. Decomposition Without Death: A Research Agenda for a New Class Analysis. Acta Sociologica.44, 203–218.
35.
Portes, A. 2000. The Resilient Importance of Class: A Nominalist Interpretation. Political Power and Social Theory.14, 249–284.
36.
Rokkan, S. 1966. Norway: Numerical Democracy and Corporate Pluralism. In R. A. Dahl (ed.). Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37.
Sklair, L. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blacwell.
38.
Treiman, D. J. & Ganzeboom, H. B. G.2000. The Fourth Generation of Comparative Stratification Research. In S. R. Quah & A. Sales (eds.). The International Handbook of Sociology. London: Sage.
39.
Wright, E. O.1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
