In general, two broad schemes of analysis have been used recently in the social sciences literature to examine reproductive health. The first type identifies a number of social-structural characteristics associated with reproductive health. The second, the reproductive rights explanation, is of recent origin and advocated by a number of scholars from the public health field. Using data from 125 developing countries, this study tests the two explanations of women's reproductive health. The empirical findings indicate the importance of fertility decline and reproductive rights in predicting reproductive health. An inverse direct relationship between women's reproductive health and their economic status is found. We argue for a gender-sensitive human rights approach toward women's reproductive health.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, N., Boyce. Th., Chesney, M., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. & Syme, L.1994. Socioeconomic Status and Health: the Challenge of the Gradient. American Psychologist.49, 15–24.
2.
Bharat, S.Bharat, S. & Aggleton, P.1999. Facing the Challenge: Household Responses to HIV/AIDS in Mumbai, India. AIDS Care.11, 31–44.
3.
Bongaart, J.Bongaart, J. & Bruce, J.1995. The Causes of Low Contraceptive in Developing Countries. Studies in Family Planning.26, 57–75.
4.
Caldwell, J.1982. Theory of Fertility Decline. London: Academic Press.
5.
Cook, R. J.1993. International Human Rights and Women's Reproductive Health. Studies in Family Planning.24, 73–86.
6.
Cook, R. J.1995. Gender, Health, and Human Rights. Health and Human Rights.1, 14–25.
7.
Copelon, R. 1999. Negotiating History of Gender in the ICC. www.iccwomen.org/reports/6+5.
8.
Correa, S.Correa, S. & Petchesky, R.1994. Reproductive and Sexual Rights: A Feminist Perspective. In G. Sen, A. Germain & L. C. Chen (eds.). Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights, pp. 107–123. Boston. MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Correa, S.Correa, S. & Reichmann, R.1994. Population and Reproductive Rights: Feminist Perspectives from the South. London: Zed Books Ltd.
10.
Crenshaw, E.Crenshaw, E. & Ameen, A.1993. Dimension of Social Inequality in the Third World: A Cross National Analysis of Income Inequality and Mortality Decline. Population Research and Policy Review, 12, 297–303.
11.
Defo, B. K.1997. Effects of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Women's Status on Women's Health in Cameroon. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 1023–1029.
12.
Dixon-Mueller, R.1993. Population Policy and Women's Rights. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
13.
Doyal, L.1995. What Makes Women Sick: Gender and the Political Economy of Health. New Brunswick. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
14.
Elson, D.1992. Male Bias in Structural Adjustment. In H. Afshar & C. Dennis (eds.). Women and Adjustment Policies in the Third World. New York: St. Martin's Press.
15.
Elstad, J. I.1996. Inequalities in Health Related to Women's Marital, Parental, and Employment Status-a Comparison Between the Early 70s and the Late 80s, Norway. Social Science and Medicine.42, 75–85.
16.
Fathalla, M. F.1992. Reproductive Health: A Global Overview. Early Human Development.29, 35–42.
17.
Garcia-Moreno, C. & Claro, A.1994. Challenges from the Women's Health Movement: Women's Rights versus Population Control. In G. Sen, A. Germain & L. C. Chen (eds.), Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights, pp. 47–57. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Germain, A., Nowrojee, S. & Pyne, H.1994. Setting a New Agenda: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. In G. Sen, A. Germain & L. C. Chen (eds.). Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights, pp. 27–46. Boston. MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Ginsburg, F. D.Ginsburg, F. D. & Rapp, R.1995. Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order. In F. D. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (eds.). Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, pp. 1–17. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.
20.
Gostin, L.Gostin, L. & Mann, J.1994. Toward the Development of Human Rights Impact Assessment for the Formulation and Evaluation of Health Policies. Health and Human Rights, 1, 58.
21.
Hartmann, B.1987. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs. New York: Harper and Row.
22.
Hartmann, H.1998. Capitalism and Patriarchy. In J. Lorber (ed.). Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics, pp. 34–35. Los Angeles. CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
23.
Heitlinger, A.1993. Women's Equality, Demography and Public Policies. New York: St. Martin's Press.
24.
Hendriks, A.1995. Promotion and Protection of Women's Rights to Sexual and Reproductive Health under International Law: The Economic Covenant and the Women's Convention. American University Law Review.44, 1123, 1138–1139.
25.
Humana, C.1992. World Human Rights Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Jolly, M.1998. Other Mothers: Maternal ‘Insouciance’ and the Depopulation Debate in Fiji and Vanuatu. 1890–1930. In K. Ram & M. Jolly (eds.). Maternities and Modernities: Colonial and Postcolonial Experiences in Asia and Pacific, pp. 177–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Kerlinger, F. N.Kerlinger, F. N. & Pedhazur, E. J.1973. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
28.
Lane, S. D.1994. From Population Control to Reproductive Health: An Emerging Policy Agenda. Social Science and Medicine, 39, 1303–1314.
29.
Mahmud, S.1993. Female Power: A Key Variable in Understanding the Relationship between Women's Work and Fertility. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
Mann, J.1996. Human Rights and Aids: The Future of the Pandemic. The John Marshal Law Review, 30, 195–206.
31.
Mann, J.1997. Medicine and Public Health. Ethics and Human Rights. Hastings Center Report, 27, 6–13.
32.
McNay, K.1995. Fertility and Fragility: Demographic Change and Health and Status of Indian Women. Economic and Political Weekly30, 81–87.
33.
Messer, E.1997. Intro-household Allocation of Food and Health Care: Current Findings and Understanding-Introduction. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 1675–1677.
34.
Misra, G., Magar, V. & Legro, S.1995. Poor Reproductive Health and Environmental Degradation: Outcomes of Women's Low Status in India. Colorado Journal of international Environmental Sciences.6, 273–283.
35.
Mosely, H. W.Mosely, H. W. & Cowley, P.1991. The Challenge of World Health. Population Bulletin, 46, 20.
36.
Neitzer, M.1994. A Woman's Place: Household Labor Allocation in Rural Kenya. Revue Canadianne d'etudes du Developpement, 15, 401–411.
37.
Newton, R. G.Newton, R. G. & Spurrel, D. J.1967. Examples of the Use of Elements for Classifying Regression Analysis. Applied Statistics.16, 165–172.
38.
O'Neil, J. D. & Kaufert, P. L.1995. Sex Determination and the Inuit Struggle for Birthing Rights in Northern Canada, In F. D. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (eds.). Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, pp. 59–73. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
Orubuloye, I. O., Oguntimehin, F. & Sadique, T.1997. Women's Role in Reproductive Health Decision Making and Vulnerability to STD and HIV/AIDS in Ekiti, Nigeria. Health Transition Review, 7, 329–336.
40.
Pappa, G., Queen, S., Hadden, W. & Fisher, G.1993. The Increasing Disparity in Mortality between Socioeconomic Groups in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 103–109.
41.
Petchesky, R. P.Petchesky, R. P. & Judd, K. (eds.) 1998. Negotiating Reproductive Rights: Women's Perspectives across Countries and Cultures. London: Zed Books.
42.
Ram, K.1998. Maternity and the Story of Enlightenment in the Colonies: Tamil Coastal Women, South India. In K. Ram & M. Jolly (eds.). Maternities and Modernities: Colonial and Post-colonial Experiences in Asia and Pacific, pp. 114–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Pitanguy, J.1994. Feminist Politics and Reproductive Rights: The Case of Brazil. In G. Sen & R. Snow (eds.), Power and Decisions: The Social Control of Reproduction, pp. 101–122. Boston. MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Ramirez, F.Ramirez, F. & McEneaney, E.1997. From Women's Suffrage to Reproductive Rights: A Cross-national Consideration. International Journal of Comparative Sociology.38, 12–24.
45.
Roberts, I.1997. Cause Specific Social Class Mortality Differentials for Child Injury and Poisoning in England and Wales. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.51, 334–335.
46.
Rosenfield, A.Rosenfield, A. & Maine, D.1985. Maternal Mortality — A Neglected Tragedy. Where Is the M in the MCH?Lancet, II, 83–85.
47.
Seibold, D. R.Seibold, D. R. & McPhee, R. D.1979. Commonality Analysis: A Method for Decomposing Explained Variance in Multiple Regression Analysis. Human Communication Research, 5, 355–365.
48.
Sen, G.1994. Reproduction: The Feminist Challenge to Social Policy, In G. Sen & R. Snow (eds.). Power and Decision: The Social Control of Reproduction, pp. 5–17. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Smith, D., Plane, D. & Bartley, M.1994. Explanations of Socioeconomic Differential in Mortality, Evidence from Britain and Elsewhere. European Journal of Public Health, 4, 131–144.
50.
United Nation, Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis.1994. World Abortion Policies. New York: United Nations.
51.
United Nations. 1994. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo. September 5–13, 1994. New York: United Nations.
52.
United Nations. 1996. The Beijing Declaration and the Platform for Action: Fourth World Conference on Women: Beijing, China: ‘tis September 1995. New York: United Nations.
53.
United Nations.1998. World Abortion Policy. New York: United Nations.
54.
United Nations Development Program.1998. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Ware, H.1993. The Effects of Fertility, Family Organization, Sex Structure of the Labor Market and Technology on the Position of Women. In N. Federici, K. O. Mason & S. Sogner (eds.), Women's Position and Demographic Change, pp. 259–284. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
56.
Whitty, N.1996. The Mind, the Body, and Reproductive Health Information. Human Rights Quarterly, 18, 224–239.
57.
World Bank. 1993. World Development Report 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
World Bank.1995. International Conference on Population and Development: Commitments to Reproductive Health and Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
World Bank.1998. A New Agenda for Women's Health and Nutrition. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
World Bank. 1999. World Development Report: Knowledge for Development 1998/99. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
World Health Organization. 1998. Progress in Human Reproduction Research, www.who.int/hrp/progress.
62.
World Resources Institute.1998. World Resources, 1998–99: A Guide to the Global Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Yamin, A. E.1996. Defining Questions: Situating Issues of Power in the Formulation of a Right to Health under International Law. Human Rights Quarterly, 18, 398–438.
64.
Zurayk, H., Younis, N. & Khattab, H.1994. Rethinking Family Planning Policy in the Light of Reproductive Health Research. International Social Science Journal, 46, 423–438.
