Los estudios sobre infrahumanizacion han verificado que las personas atribuyen características exclusivamente humanas a su propio grupo al tiempo que restringen esa posibilidad al exogrupo. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si los contextos físicos agradables y desagradables modifican la pauta de infrahumanización del exogrupo. Para ello se diseñó una tarea de reconocimiento visual de palabras precedida por imágenes en las que se manipulaba el escenario físico sobre el que aparecían fotografías del endogrupo y del exogrupo. Los resultados muestran que hay una mayor asociación entre endogrupo y sentimientos que entre exogrupo y sentimientos cuando el fondo es un espacio agradable. Esta diferencia desaparece cuando se presentan en un espacio físico desagradable. La explicación de los resultados se hace atendiendo a la importancia del espacio físico en la identidad de los grupos.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschS. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
2.
AschS. E. (1958). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. ENMaccobyE.NewcombT.HartleyE. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 174–183). Nueva York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
3.
BechtelR. B. (1992). Depressing and Happy Places. En Proceedings of the IAPS 12th International Conference Socio-environmental Metamorphoses (Vol. 11, 315–319). Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
BlessH. (2001). The consequences of mood on the processing of social Information. ENTesserA.SchwarzN. (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intraindividual Processes (pp. 391–412). Massachussets: Blackwell Pub.
6.
BodenhausenG. V.KramerG. P.SüsserK. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–632.
7.
BrewerM. B.BrownR. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. ENGilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 554–594). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
CorralizaJ. A. (1998). Emoción y ambiente. ENAragonésJ. I.AmérigoM. (Eds.), Psicología Ambiental (pp. 59–76). Madrid: Pirámide.
9.
CortésB.DemoulinS.VikiT.Rodríguez-torresR.Rodríguez-pérezA.LeyensJ. PH (2005). Infra-humanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup and the outgroup.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 243–253.
10.
DelgadoN.Rodríguez-pérezA.VaesJ.BetancorV.LeyensJ. PH (en revisión). Contextual variations of infrahumanization: The role of physical context and territoriality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
11.
DemoulinS.LeyensJ. PHPaladinoM. P.Rodríguez-torresR.Rodríguez-pérezA.DovidioJ. F. (2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non-uniquely” emotions.Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71–96.
12.
DemoulinS.LeyensJ. PHRodríguez-torresR.Rodríguez-pérezA.PaladinoM. P.FiskeS.T. (2005). Motivation to support a desired conclusion versus motivation to avoid an undesirable conclusion: The case of infra-humanization.International Journal of Psychology, 40, 416–428.
13.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.
14.
GalindoM. P.HidalgoM. C. (2005). Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes.International Journal of Psychology, 40, 19–26.
15.
GauntR.LeyensJ. PHDemoulinS. (2002). Intergroup relations and the attribution of emotions: Controllability of memory for secondary emotions associated to ingroup versus outgroup.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 508–514.
16.
GauntR.LeyensJ. PHSindicD. (2004). Motivated reasoning and the attribution of emotions to ingroup and outogroup.International Review of Social Psychology, 17, 5–20.
17.
GauntR.SindicD.LeyensJ. PH (2005). Intergroup relations in footballs finals: Predicting emotional reactions of ingroup and outgroup football fans.Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 117–126.
18.
GreenwaldA. G.McgheeD. E.SchwartzJ. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
19.
HartigT.StaatsH. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 215–226.
20.
KelmanH. C. (1978). Israelis and Palestinians: Psychological prerequisites for mutual acceptance.International Security, 13, 162–186.
21.
KorosecP. (1976). Appropriation of space. Proceedings of the Strasbourg Conference.Louvain-la-Neuve: CIACO.
22.
LackneyJ. A. (2000). Thirty-three educational design principles for schools and community learning centers.Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
23.
LalliM. (1988). Urban Identity. ENCanterD. (Eds.), Environmental Social Psychology, NATO ASI Series, Behavioural and Social Sciences (Vol. 45, pp. 303–311). Dordrech: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24.
LeyensJ. PHDemoulinS.DovidioJ.FiskeS. T.GauntR.PaladinoM. P.Rodríguez-pérezA.Rodríguez-torresR.VaesV. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism.European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 703–717.
25.
LeyensJ. PHPaladinoP. M.Rodríguez-torresR.VaesJ.DemoulinS.Rodríguez-pérezA.GauntR. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The role of secondary emotions.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.
26.
LeyensJ. PHRodríguez-pérezA.Rodríguez-torresR.GauntR.PaladinoP. M.VaesJ.DemoulinS. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups.European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 395–411.
27.
PaladinoP. M.LeyensJ. PHRodríguez-torresR.Rodríguez-pérezA.GauntR.DemoulinS. (2002). Differential association of uniquely and non uniquely human emotions to the ingroup and the outgroups.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 105–117.
28.
PeronE.PurcellA. T.StaatsH. J.FalcheroS.LambR. J. (1998). Models of preference for outdoor scenes: Some empirical evidence.Environment and Behavior, 30, 282–305.
29.
ProshanskyH. M. (1978). The city and self-identity.Environment and Behavior, 10, 147–169.
30.
RothbartM.TaylorM. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? En SeminG.FiedlerF. (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). Londres: Sage Ltd.
31.
StokolsD. (1990). Instrumental and Spiritual Views of People-Environment Relations.American Psychologist, 45, 641–646.
32.
StokolsD.ShumakerS. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. En HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior and the environment (pp. 441–488). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
33.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. ENWorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, MI: Nelson-Hall.
35.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory.Oxford y Nueva York: Blackwell.
36.
VaesJ.PaladinoM. P.CastelliL.LeyensJ. PHGiovanazziA. (2003). On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: The implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1016–1034.
37.
VaesJ.PaladinoM. P.LeyensJ. PH (2002). The lost E-mail: Prosocial reactions induced by uniquely human emotions.British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 521–534.
38.
ValeraS.PolE. (1994). El concepto de identidad social urbana: una aproximación entre la psicología social y la psicología ambiental.Anuario de Psicología, 62, 5–24.
39.
WittenbrinkB.JuddC. M.ParkB. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815–827.
