Several research studies have argued that people evaluate incivilities of places as part of the process of estimating how safe they might be. The study presented here examined whether such an assumption is upheld when people are allowed to express their thoughts about places before rating how disordered a place seems to them. British students evaluated three residential areas with different levels of disorder. First, participants had to write their impressions about the places and then rate how disordered, risky and unsafe the places seemed to them. The qualitative analysis showed that despite participants referred to physical disorder, only few participants mentioned crime and safety. Results from the quantitative analysis revealed that as the more disordered a place was rated the more unsafe it was considered. Findings suggest both that disordered places not always elicit unsafe concerns and that the so predicted relationship between disorder and safety maybe method dependant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrantinghamP.BrantinghamP. (1995). Criminality of place. Crime generators and crime attractors.European Journal on Criminal Policy and research, 3, 5–26.
2.
BrownB. B.PerkinsD. D. (2001). Neighbourhood revitalization and disorder: An intervention evaluation. Executive summary of final report to The National Institute of Justice. Salt Lake City: University of Utah. Retrieved from: http://www.people.vanderbilt.edu/∼dougks.d.perkins/NIJsum.final.htm
3.
BrownB. B.PerkinsD. D.BrownG. (2004). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 359–371.
4.
BrunsonL.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2001). Resident appropriation of defensible space in public housing: Implications for Safety and Community.Environment and Behavior, 33 (5), 626–652.
5.
CozensP.HillierD.PrescottG. (2001). Crime and the design of residential property: Exploring the theoretical background (Part 2).Property management, 19 (2), 136–164.
6.
DoranB. J.LeesB. G. (2005). Investigating the spatiotemporal links between disorder, crime, and the fear of crime.The Professional Geographer, 57 (1), 1–12.
7.
FarrallS.BannisterJ.DittonJ.GilchristE. (1997). Questioning the measurement of the fear of crime. Findings from a Major Methodological Study.British Journal of Criminology, 31 (4), 658–679.
8.
FarrallS.GrayE.And JacksonJ. (2007). 'Theorising the Fear of Crime: The Cultural and Social Significance of Insecurities about Crime', Experience and Expression in the Fear of Crime: Working Paper #5. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012393.
9.
FattahE. A. (1993). Research On Fear of Crime: Some Common Conceptual And Measurement Problems. In BilskyW.PfeifferC.WetzelsP. (Eds.), Fear of Crime and Criminal Victimisation (pp. 45–70). Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.
10.
FerraroK. F.LagrangeR. (1987). The measurement of fear of crime.Sociological Inquiry, 51 (1), 70–101.
11.
FranziniL.O'brienM.MurrayS.O'campoP. (2008). Perceptions of disorder: Contributions of neighbourhood characteristics to subjective perceptions of disorder.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 83–93.
12.
FriederichsJ.BlasiusJ. (2003). Social norms in distressed neighbourhoods: Testing the Wilson Hypothesis.Housing Studies, 18 (6), 807–826.
13.
GarciaR. M.TaylorR. B.BrianA. L. (2007). Impacts of violent crime and neighbourhood structure on trusting your neighbours.Justice Quarterly, 24 (4), 679–704.
14.
GoffmanE. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order.London: Cox and Wyman Ltd (Penguin Books, Ltd.).
15.
HaleC. (1996). Fear of Crime: A review of the literature.International Review of Victimology, 4, 79–150.
16.
JacksonJ. P. (2004a). Experience and expression: Social and cultural significance in the fear of crime.British Journal of Criminology, 44, 946–966.
17.
JacksonJ. P. (2004b). An Analysis of construct and debate: The fear of crime. In AlbrechtH.SerassisT.KaniaH. (Eds.), Images of crime II: Representation of crime and the criminal in politics, society, the media and the arts.Freiburg: Edition Iuscrim (Max Planck Institute).
18.
KuoF. E.BacaicoaM.SullivanW. C. (1998). Transforming Inner-City landscapes. Trees, sense of safety and preference.Environment and Behavior, 30 (1), 28–59.
19.
KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the Inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?Environment and Behavior, 33 (3), 343–367.
20.
MarkowitzF. E.BellairP. E.LiskaA.LiuJ. (2001). Extending Social Disorganisation Theory: Modeling the relationships between cohesion, disorder and fear.Criminology, 39 (2), 293–319.
21.
MiceliR.RoccatoM.RosatoR. (2004). Fear of crime in Italy.Environment and behaviour, 36 (6), 776–789.
22.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sources Book.Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.
23.
PainterK. (1996). The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark.Landscape and Urban Planning, 35, 193–201.
24.
PerkinsD. D.TaylorR. B. (1996). Ecological assessments of community disorder: Their relationship to fear of crime and theoretical implications.American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 63–107.
25.
RossC. E.ReynoldsJ. R.GeisK. J. (2000). The contingent meaning of neighbourhood stability for resident's psychological well-being.American Sociological Review, 65 (4), 581–597.
26.
SchweitzerJ. H.Woo KimJ.MackinjR. (1999). The impact of the built environment on crime and fear of crime in urban neighbourhoods.Journal of urban technology, 6 (3), 59–73.
27.
SemmensN. (2004). The intangible costs of crime: Why the fear of crime causes us a problem. Paper to the second ESRC seminar on “Crime, insecurity and well-being: an economic approach”. Shefield, 18 May, 2004. Paper obtained from the author.
28.
SkoganW. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighbourhoods.Los Angeles: University of California Press.
29.
TaylorR. B. (2001a). Breaking away from broken windows.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
TaylorR. B. (2001b). Crime prevention through environmental design: Yes, no, maybe, unknowable, and all of the above. In BechtelR.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 413–425). New York: John Wiley and Sons, inc.
31.
TaylorR. B. (1996). Neighbourhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighbourhood use value.Sociological Forum, 11 (1), 41–74.
32.
TaylorR. B. (1987). Toward an environmental psychology of disorder: delinquency, crime, and fear of crime. In StokolsD.AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 951–986). New York: John-Wiley & Sons.
