EEl artículo trata de dar una visión panorámica de tres campos de investigación: relaciones intergrupales, influencia mayoritaria y minoritaria, y dinámica intragrupal, tratando de señalar las tendencias más sobresalientes tanto desde el punto de vista teórico como metodológico en la investigación reciente en este área.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsD. (1994). Political distinctiveness: an identity optimising approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 3, 357–366.
2.
AbramsD.HoggM.A. (1990). Social Identity theory. Constructive and critical advances.Nueva York: Verlag.
3.
AyestaránS. (1993). Estado actual del área de los grupos. EnFernández Jiménez De CisnerosI.Martínez GarcíaM. (Eds.), Epistemología y procesos psicosociales básicos.Sevilla: Eudema.
4.
AyestaránS. (Eds) (1996). El grupo como contrucción social.Barcelona: Plural Ediciones.
5.
AyestaránS.ArróspideJ.Martínez-taboadaC (1992). Nuevas técnicas en el estudio de los grupos. EnClementeM. (Ed), Psicología Social. Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación.Madrid: Eudema.
6.
BalesR.F. (1985). The new field theory in social psychology. International Journal of Small Group Research, 1, 1–18.
7.
BalesR.F.CohenS.P. (1979). SYMLOG: a system for the multiple level observation of groups.Nueva York: Free Press.
8.
BartschR.A.JuddC.M. (1993). Majority minority status and perceived ingroup variability revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 471–483.
9.
BlanzM.MummendeyA.OttenS. (1995). Perceptions of relative gropup size and group status: effects of intergroup discrimination in negative evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 2, 231–247.
10.
BertchterH.J. (1994). Group participation. Techniques for leaders and members.Thousand Oakes: Sage.
11.
BourhisR.Y.GagnonA.MoiseL.C. (1995). Discrimination et relations intergroupes. EnBourhisR.Y.LeyensJ.Ph. (Eds), Stereotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes.Mardaga: Liége.
12.
BranscombeN.R.WannD.L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 6, 641–658.
13.
BreakwellG.M. (1993). Integrating paradigms: Methodological implications. EnBreakwellG.M.CantorD. (Eds), Empirical approaches to Social Representations.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
BrewerM.B. (1991). The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
15.
BurlingameG.M.KircherJ.C.HontsCh. R. (1994). Analysis of variance versus bootstrap procedures for analyzing dependent observation s in small group research. Small Group Research, 25, 486–501.
16.
CantoJ.M.GómezL. (1993). Grado de Conflicto y conversión. Una aproximación desde la técnica estadística de las ecuaciones diferenciales. EnFernández Jiménez De CisnerosI.Martínez GarcíaM. (Eds.), Epistemología y procesos psicosociales básicos.Sevilla: Eudema.
17.
CantoJ.M.MontalbánF.M.BravoM (1993 a). Una nueva temática en el estudio de la influencia social. En Fernández Jiménez De CisnerosI.Martínez GarcíaM. (Eds.), Epistemología y procesos psicosociales básicos.Sevilla: Eudema.
18.
ClarkR.D. (1994). The role of censorship in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 3, 331–338.
19.
DeschampsJ.CMoralesJ.F.PáezD.Paicheler (Eds) (en prensa). Current perspectives on social identity and social categorization.
20.
DeauxKReidA.MizhariK.A (1995). Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 280–291.
21.
DuckJ.M.HoggM.A.TerryD.J. (1995). Me, us, and them: political identification an the third person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 2, 195–216.
22.
EchebarríaA.GonzálezJ.L. (1993). Social representation of Europe and intergroup conflicts.Reunión de la Asociación Europea de Psicología Social Experimental. Lisboa.
23.
EchabeA.E.GuedeE.F.CastroJ.L.G. (1994). Social representations and intergroup conflicts: who's smoking here. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 3, 339–356.
24.
ElejebarrietaF.TorregrosaM. (1995). Dominant identities and dominated ethnical representations.IV Congreso Europeo de Psicología. Atenas. Julio 2–7.
25.
EllisD.G.FisherB.A. (1994). Small group decision making. Communication and the group propcess.Nueva York: Mc Graw.
26.
EllemersN. (1993). The influence of socio-estructural variables on identity managemente strategies. EnStroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–58.
27.
EthierK.A.DeauxK. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 2, 243–251.
28.
FineG.A. (1986). Behavioral change in group space: a reintegration of Lewinian theory in small group research. EnLawlerE.J. (Ed), Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press, 3, 23–50.
29.
FisekM.H.NormanR.Z.WagnerD.G. (1985). The formation of reward expectationsin status situations. EnBergerJ.ZelditchM. (Eds), Status rewards and influence. How expectations organize be havior.san Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
FiskeS.T.GoodwinS.A. (1994). Social cognition research and small group research, a West Side Story or….?Small Group Research, 25, 2, 147–171.
31.
FreyL.R. (1994). Group communication in context Studies of natural groups.Hillsdale: LEA.
32.
FreyL.R. (1994). The naturalistic paradigm. Small Group Research, 25, 4, 551–577.
33.
GaertnerS.L.RustM.C.DovidioJ.F.BachmanB.A.AnastasioPh.D. (1995). The contact hypothesis: the role of common ingroup identity on reducing ingroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 2, 224–249.
34.
GerbahardtL.J.MeyersR.A. (1995). Subgroup influence in decision-making groups. Examining consitency from a communication perspective. Small Group Research, 26, 2, 147–168.
35.
GonzálezL.CantóJ. (1995). La influencia minoritaria en Psicología Social: apuntes para una reconstrucción histórica. Revista de Psicología Social, 10, 1, 75–99.
36.
HareA.P. (1989). New field theory: SYMLOG research 1960–1988. En LawlerE.J. (Ed), Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press, 6, 75–99.
37.
HareA.P.BlumbergH.H.DaviesM.F.KentM.V. (1994). Small Group Research: A handbook.Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corpopration.
38.
HarstoneMAgoustinosM. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 2, 179–94.
39.
HinszV. B. (1995). Mental models of groups as social systems. Considerations of specification and assessment. Small Groups Research, 26, 2, 200–233.
40.
HinkleS.BrownR. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: some links and lacunae. EnAbramsD.MA, Hogg (Eds), Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances.Nueva York: Springer Verlag.
41.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1993). Group Cohesiveness. Social Psychological Perspectives.Nueva York: Harvester wheatseaf.
42.
HoggM.A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: a critical review and some new directions. EnStroebeW.HewstoneM., European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85–112.
43.
HoyleR.H.CrawfordA. M. (1994). Use of individual level data to investigate group phenomena: issues and strategies. Small Group Research, 25, 4, 464–485
44.
HuiciC.RosM. (1993). Identidad Comparativa y diferenciación intergrupal.Psichotema, Numero Monográfico 5 Suplemento, 225–236.
45.
IBÁÑEZT. (1994). Ideologie et relations intergroupes. EnBourhisR.Y.Ph. LeyensJ. (Eds), Stereotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes.Liége: Mardaga.
46.
KellyC. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective actions. EnStroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59–84.
47.
KennyD.A.La VoieL. (1984). The social relations model. EnBerkowitzL. (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.Nueva York: Academic Press, 18, 139–180.
48.
KeytonJ. (1994). Reflectioins on the special issue on research problems and methodology. Small Group Behavior, 25, 459–462
49.
KirchlerE.PalmonariA.PombeiM.L. (1994). Social categorization processes as dependent on status differences between groups: a step into adolescents peer groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 5, 541–564.
50.
KozakaiT.MoscoviciS.PersonnazB. (1994). Contrary effects of group cohesiveness in minority influence: intergroup categorization of the source and levels of influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 6, 713–718.
51.
LalondeSilverman (1994). Behavioral prefernces in response to social injustice: the effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1, 78–85.
52.
LevineJ.M.MorelandR.L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.
53.
LevineJ.M.MorelandR. (1994). Group Socialization: theory and research. EnStroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 305–336.
54.
LewickiP. (1982). Social Psychology as viewed by its practitioners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 409–416.
55.
LindemanM.KoskelaP. (1994). Group size, controllability of group membership, and comparative time context as determinants of intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 2, 267–278.
56.
LindemanM.SundvickL. (1995). Evaluative bias and self-enhancement among gender groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 3, 269–280.
57.
LiuJ.H.CampbellS.M.CondieH. (1995). Ethnocentrism in dating preferences for an American sample: the ingroup bias in social context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1, 95–117.
58.
LovagliaM.J. (1994). Relating power to status. EnLawlerE.J. (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press, 11, 87–112.
59.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale self evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.
60.
MaasA.ArcuriL. (1992). The role of language in the persistence of stereotypes. EnSemninG.FiedlerK. (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition.Londres: Sage.
61.
MaasA.MilesiA.ZabbibiS.StahlbergD. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: differential expectancies or ingroup protection. Journal of Social Psychology, 68, 116–126.
62.
MarquesJ.M.PáezD. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. EnStroebeW.HewstoneM.. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68.
63.
MartinR. (1995). Majority andminority influence using the afterimage paradigm: a replication with an unambigous blue slide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 4, 373–382.
64.
MillwardL.J. (1995). Contextualizing social identity in considerations of what it means to be a nurse. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 3, 303–324.
65.
MontalbánF.M.GómezL. (1993). Diferenciación intergrupal e intragrupal bajo desigualdad de status. EnFernándezI.MartínezM.F. (Comp.), Epistemología y procesos psicosociales básicos.Sevilla: Eudema.
66.
MontalbánF.M.GómezL. (1995). Efectos de la discrepancia de estatus sobre el comportamiento intergrupal. Revista de Psicología Social, 10, 2, 219–234.
67.
Mucchi-FainaA. (1995). Minority influence: the effects of social status of an inclusive versus exclusive group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 6, 679–692.
68.
MugnyG.FalomirJ.M. (1995). Comentario a La influencia minoritaria en psicología social: apuntes para una reconstrucción histórica. Revista de Psicología Social, 10, 1, 119–122.
69.
MugnyG.PérezJ.A. (1991). The social psychology of minority influence.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
MullenB.AnthonyT.SalasE.DriskellJ.E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making. An integration of tests of the group hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 2, 189–204.
71.
PérezJ.A.FalomirJ.M.MugnyG. (1995). Internalization of conflict and attitude change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1, 117–124.
72.
PérezJ.A.MugnyG. (1993). Influences sociales. La theorie de I'elaboration du conflict.Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestle.
73.
PurkhardtS.C. (1993). Transforming social representations: a social psychology of common sense in science.Londres: Routledge.
74.
RosM.CanoC.HuiciC. (1988). Language and intergroup perception in Spain. EnGudykunstW.B. (Ed.), Language and ethnic identity. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. 243–258.
75.
RosM.HuiciC.CanoJ.I. (1994). Ethnolinguistic vitality and social identity their impact on ingroup bias and social attribution. International Journal Sociology of Language, 3, 145–166.
76.
SachdevI.BourhisR.Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24.
77.
Sánchez-mazasM.RouxP.MugnyG. (1994). When outgroup becomes ingroup and when the ingroup becomes outgroup: xenophobia and social categorization in a resource allocation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 3, 417–423.
78.
ShellyR.K. (1995). Extending interaction theory. Small Group Research, 26, 3, 315–327.
79.
SimonB. (1992). The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: reintroducing the intergroup context. EnStroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 1–30.
80.
SimonB. (1995). The perception of ingroup and outgroup hommogeneity: on the confounding of group size, level of abstractness and frame of reference. A reply. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 463–468.
81.
SimonB.HamiltonD.L. (1994). Self stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative ingroup size and ingroup status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 4, 499–711.
82.
SimonB.KullaC.ZobelM. (1995). On being more than just a part of the whole: regional identity and social distinctiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 325–340.
83.
SolanoC.H. (1989). The interactive perspective: getting the social back into social psychology. EnLearyM.R. (Ed), The State of Social Psychology. Issues, themes and controversies.Newbury Park: Sage.
84.
SteinerI.D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. EnBerkowitzL. (Ed), Advance in Experimental Social Psychology.Orlando: Academic.
85.
Von CranachM.OchsenbeinG.ValachL. (1986). The group as a self-active system: outline of a theory of group action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 193–229.
86.
WagnerD.G.BergerJ. (1993). Status characteristics theory: the growth of a program. EnBergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr. (Eds), Theoretical research program. Studies in growth theory.Stanford, CA: Stanford university Press.
87.
WagnerW. (1995). Social representations, group affiliation, and projection: knowing the limits of validty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 2, 125–140.
88.
WheelanS.A. (1994). Group processess. A developmental perspective.Needham Heights, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
89.
WorchelS. (1994). You can go home again: returning group research to the group context with an eye on development issues. Small Group Research, 25, 2, 205–223.
90.
YzerebytV.Y.LeyensJ. PhBellourF. (1995). The ingroup overexclusion effect: identity concerns in decisions about group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1–16.
