This paper explores the relation between gender stereotyping in traits and roles and sociodemographic variables, as well as the relation between the descriptive and prescriptive characteristics of such traits and roles. In Study 1, a representative national sample of 1255 participants was used. The results showed that trait stereotyping did not vary among participants, whereas role stereotyping did vary as a function of gender (women stereotyped less) age (young people stereotyped less) and educational level (people with a high level stereotyped less). The relation between trait stereotyping (descriptive) and role stereotyping (prescriptive) is very low. Study 2 was carried out to verify mainly the relation between the prescriptive and descriptive aspects of a single component: traits. The participants were 96 professional women. In this study, a weak relation was found between the descriptive and the prescriptive aspects of trait stereotyping, and a strong relation between the prescriptive aspects of traits and roles. These results are coherent with the assumption that the descriptive and prescriptive aspects of gender stereotyping are independent. In both studies, correlations were observed indicating that people who tend to stereotype in instrumental traits also maintain more stereotyped beliefs about the prescriptive trait and role aspects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlterR. J.SetaC. E. (2005). Compensation for inconsistencies: The effects of stereotype strength on expectations of applicants' job success and satisfaction. Sex Roles, 53, 79–87.
2.
AshmoreR. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. InPervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 486–526). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
AusterC. J.OhmS. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528.
4.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181–198.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
7.
BiernatM.ThompsonE. R. (2002). Shifting standards and stereotype and contextual variation in stereotyping. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 103–137.
8.
BurgessD.BorgidaE. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotypes and sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692.
9.
DeLAFuenteM. (2007). Usos del tiempo, estereotipos, valores y actitudes.Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.
10.
DeauxK.LafranceM. (1998). Gender. InGilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 788–827). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
DeauxK.LewisL. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationship among components and gender labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
12.
DevineP. G. (1986). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotyping and prejudice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1326.
13.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.
14.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
15.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.
16.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes, occupational roles and beliefs about part-time employees. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 252–262.
17.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. E. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915–928.
18.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. InEckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the partner preferences of women and men. InEaglyA. H.BeallA. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 269–295). New York: Guilford Press.
20.
EchebarriaA.GonzálezJ. L. (1999). The impact of context on gender social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 287–304.
21.
ElejabeitiaC.López-sáezM. (2003). Trayectorias personales y profesionales de mujeres con estudios tradicionalmente masculinos.Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.
22.
FiskeS. T.StevensL. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. InOskampS.CostanzoM. (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1999) Sexisms and other “isms”: Interdependence, status and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In SwannW. B.LangloisJ. H.GilbertL. A. (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society (pp. 193–221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ.AbramsD.MasserB.et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
25.
GlickP.LameirasM.FiskeS.T.EckesT.MasserB.VolpatoC.et al.. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.
26.
GlickP.LameirasM.Rodríguez-castroY. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexisms toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441.
27.
GlickP.LarsenS.JohnsonC.BranstiterH. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low-and high status jobs. Psychology of women quarterly, 29, 389–395.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
32.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
33.
KillenL. A.López-zafraEEaglyA. H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparisons of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 313–322.
34.
López-sáezM.MoralesJ. F.LisbonaA. (2008). Evolution of gender stereotypes in Spain: traits and roles. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 609–617.
35.
MccauleyC.StittC. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36, 929–940.
36.
MccauleyC.StittC. L.SegalM. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195–208.
37.
MoralesJ. F.López-sáezM. (1994). Construcción de un sistema de indicadores de género con una muestra representativa de la población española y dos muestras estratégicas de comparación. Investigación financiada por el Instituto de la Mujer. Manuscrito no publicado.
38.
PowellG. N.ButterfieldD. A.ParentJ. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?Journal of Management, 28, 177–193.
39.
PrenticeD. L.CarranzaE. (2004). Sustaining cultural beliefs in the face of their violation: The case of gender stereotypes. InSchallerM. E.CrandallC. S. (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 259–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, H, 1004–1010.
41.
SczesnyS.BosakJ.NeffD.SchynsB. (2004). Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross- cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 51, 631–645.
42.
SelwynN. (2007). e-learning or she-learning? Exploring students' gendered perceptions of education technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 744–746.
43.
SldaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SpenceJ. T. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 40, 1285–1295.
45.
SpenceJ. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.
46.
SpenceJ. T.BucknerC. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–62.
47.
SpenceJ. T.HahnE. D. (1997). The Attitudes toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17–34.
48.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
49.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
TwengeJ. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.
51.
WhiteM. J.WhiteG. B. (2006). Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 55, 259–266.
52.
WilliamsJ. E.BestD. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotyping: A multination study.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
