Several authors have proposed two alternative sources of information in memory based judgments: the contents retrieved from memory and the ease with which the retrieval process is perceived. Schwarz and colleagues have made it clear that, in certain circumstances, people base their judgments on the subjective experience of ease with which the information is retrieved. The present work studies the extent to which the use of this heuristic could be generalized to judgments of social change (Study 1) and some of the factors that can affect the ability to diagnose the ease of retrieval as a source of information (Study 2). The results obtained confirm the ability to generalize this heuristic to judgments of social change and to establish some conditions that affect the diagnostic- city of this source of information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AriasA. V.Iglesias-ParroS.MoralesJ. F. (2005). La accesibilidad en los juicios de cambio social. Presented in theIX Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social “Construyendo la Europa de los Pueblos”, september, A Coruña (Spain).
2.
DijksterhuisA.MacraeC. N.HaddockG. (1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 760–768.
3.
GabrielcikA.FazioR. H. (1984). Priming and frequency estimation: A strict test of the availability heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 85–89.
4.
HigginsE. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. InHigginsE.T.KruglanskiA. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.
5.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
6.
JostJ. T.MajorB. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspective of ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
LynchJ. G.SrullT. K. (1982). Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 18–37.
8.
MarkusH. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing of information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
9.
MoscoviviS. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change.London: Academic Press.
10.
NemethC. (1975). Understanding minority influence: A reply and a digression. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 265–267.
11.
NemethC. (1983). Reflections on the dialogue between status style: Influence processes of social control and social change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 70–74.
12.
Noelle-NeumannE. (1993). The spiral of silence.Chicago: University of Chicago Press
13.
RothmanA. J.HardinC. (1997). Differential use of the availability heuristic in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 123–138.
14.
RothmanA. J.SchwarzN. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053–1064.
15.
SchwarzN. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87–99.
16.
SchwarzN. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (4), 332–348.
17.
SchwarzN. (2005). When thinking feels difficult: Metacognitive experiences in judgment and decision making. Medical Decision Making25, 105–112.
18.
SchwarzN.BlessH.BohnerG. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 161–199.
19.
SchwarzN.BlessH.StrackF.KlumpG.Rittenauer-SchtkaH.SimonsA. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
20.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. InHigginsE.T.KruglanskiA. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York: Guilford.
21.
SchwarzN.SkurnikI. (2003). Feelings and thinking: Implications for problem solving. InDavidsonJ.StembergR. (Eds.), The nature of problem solving (pp. 263–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SchwarzN.VaughnL. A. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: Recalled content and ease of recall as information. InGilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), The psychology of intuitive judgment: Heuristic and biases (pp. 103–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SpearsR.JettenJ.DoosjeB. (2001). The (Il)legitimacy of Ingroup Bias. From social Reality to Social Resistance. InJostJohn T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives of ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (pp. 332–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
StepperS.StrackF (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 211–220.
25.
TajfelH. (1971) “Experiments in vacuum”. In IsraelJ.TajfelH. (Eds.), The context of social Psychology: A critical investigation (pp. 1–13). London: Academic Press.
26.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986), The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
27.
Tajfel (1981). Human groups and social categories.Cambridge, Cambridge University.
28.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
29.
WänkeM.SchwarzN.BlessH. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83–90.
30.
WinkielmanP.SchwarzN.BelliR. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9 (2), 124–126.
31.
WorchelS. (1999). Written in blood: Ethnic Identity and Struggle for human harmony.New York: Worth.
