This paper presents a review of sociopsychological literature on the recent topic of meta-stereotypes, i. e., beliefs that group members typically have about how others see them. The impact of meta-stereotypes on intergroup relations and their connection with stereotyping processes are analyzed.
Antecedents, concept and traits of meta-stereotypes are described in an attempt to show that meta-stereotypes fit into the general category of processes derived from group members' awareness that outgroup members stereotype their group. In order to arrive at a proper definition of meta-stereotypes, its differences with related concepts are underlined in the second section of the paper. A review of research published or in progress on meta-stereotypes follows, trying to show how they have contributed to the study of this process and to open new lines of research. Finally, three recent theoretical developments in social psychology, i.e., social stigma, stereotype threat, and empathy are analyzed and their connection with meta-stereotypes is emphasized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. InAlloyL. B. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in depression (pp. 223–265) New York: Guilford Press.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice.Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BackmanC. W.SecordP. F. (1959). The effect of perceived liking on interpersonal attraction. Human Relations, 12, 379–384.
4.
BarakA. (1990). Counselor training in empathy by a game procedure. Counsdor Education and Supervision, 29, 170–186.
5.
BaronR. A.ByrneD. (1996). Social Psychology (6th edition). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
6.
BarretoM.GómezA. (Under Preparation). Meta-stereotype information as an strategy to improve intergroup relations: the effect of the source that provide the information.
7.
BatsonC. D.PolycarpouM. P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH. J.MitchenerE. C.BednarL. L.KleinT. R.HighbergerL. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings towards the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.
8.
BaumeisterR. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena, Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.
9.
BemD. J. (1967). Self perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.
10.
BlanzM.MummendeyA.OttenS. (1995). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: the impact of stimulus valence and size and status differentials on intergroup evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 409–419.
11.
BoenF.VanbeseleareN. (Under Preparation). Behavioral reactions to intergroup discrimination: Flanders vs. Wallony.
12.
BranscomeN.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. InEllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social Identity (pp. 59–83). Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: theoretical perspectives on desegregation. InMillerN.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: the psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Orlands: Academic Press.
14.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? InKatzP.TaylorD. (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Means and controversies (pp. 315–326). New York: Plenum Press.
15.
BrownR.AbramsD. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity, and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78–92.
16.
BrownR. J.WadeG. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: the effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131–142
17.
CasasJ. M.PonderottoJ. G.SweeneyM. (1987). Stereotyping the stereotypes: A Mexican American perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 45–57.
18.
ClarkR.AndersonN. B.ClarckV. R.WilliamsD. R. (1999). Racism as a Stressor for African Americans. A Biopsychological Model. American Psychologist, 54, 10, 805–816.
19.
ColemanL. M.JussimL.AbramsJ. (1987). Students' reactions to teachers' evaluations: The unique impact of negative feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1051–1070
20.
CooleyC. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order.New York: Scribner's.
21.
CrockerJ.CornwellB.MajorB. (1993). The stigma of overweight: Affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (1), 60–70.
22.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1994). Reactions to stigma: The moderating role of justifications. InZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 7. The psychology of prejudice (pp. 289–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
CrockerJ.MajorB.Steele, (1998). Social stigma. InFiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 504–553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
CrockerJ.VoelkK.TestaM.MajorB. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.
25.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1964). The approval motive. Studies in evaluative dependence. New York. Wiley.
26.
CurryT. J.EmersonR. M. (1970). Balance theory: A theory of interpersonal attraction?Sociometry, 33, 216–238.
27.
CurtisR. C.MillerK. (1986). Believing another likes or dislikes you: Behavior making the beliefs come true. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 284–290.
28.
DarleyJ. M.FazioR. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.
29.
DavisM. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach.Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
30.
DavisJ.SmithT. (1990). General Social Surveys, 1972–1990.Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
31.
DepauloB. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentations. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
32.
DepauloB. M.KennyD. A.HooverC. W.WebbW.OliverP. V. (1987). Accuracy in person perception: Do people know what kinds of impressions they convey?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 303–315.
33.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
34.
DevineP. G.EvettS. R.Vasquez-SusonK. A. (1996). Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of intergroup contact. InSorrentinoR.HigginnsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 423–464). New York: Guilford Press.
35.
DoiseW. (1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
DuanC.HillC. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261–274.
37.
DunnigD.StoryA. L. (1991). Depression, realism, and the overconfidence effect: Are the sadder wiser when predicting future actions and events?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 521–532.
38.
EreraP. I. (1997). Empathy training for helping professionals: Model and Evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 245–260.
39.
FeinS.SpencerS. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44.
40.
FeningsteinA.ScheierM. F.BussA. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
41.
FigurskyT. J. (1987). Self-awareness and other-awareness: The use of perspective in everyday life. InYardleyK.HonessT. (Eds.), Self and Clinical Psychology, 43 (pp. 522–527). New York: Wiley.
42.
FinchilescuG.HuntK.MankgeK.NuñezD. (Under Preparation). Meta-stereotypes, attitudes and anxiety in a situation of inter-racial interaction.
43.
FunderD. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgement. Psychologicall Bulletin, 101, 75–90.
44.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model.Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
45.
GardhamK.BrownR. (2001). Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: Explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 23–34.
46.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life.New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books.
47.
GómezA. (1998). Factores facilitadores de los efectos positivos del contacto intergrupal. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. UNED, Madrid.
48.
GómezA.BarretoM. (2001). Reactions to Social Hypocrisy: Effects of Meta-stereotype Information and Social Fairness on Outgroup Evaluation. Paper presented at the4th Jena Workshop on Intergroup Processes. Jena, Germany.
49.
GómezA.HuiciC. (1999). Orientación política y racismo sutil y manifiesto: relaciones con la discriminación. Revista de Psicología Social, 14, 2–3, 159–180.
50.
GómezA.HuiciC. (Submitted for publication-a). Living in different worlds…at the same country. Effects of Meta-stereotype characteristics on outgroup image between Autonomic Groups of Spain.
51.
GómezA.HuiciC. (Submitted for publication-b). When contact with them improves our image: Effects of positive social comparisons and meta-stereotypes on intergroup relations. Madrid: UNED.
52.
GómezA.Rodríguez-bailónR. (2000), Metastereotype Information and Value Congruence as Combined Strategies to modify Outgroup Evaluation. 3th Jena Workshop on Intergroup Processes Schlob Kochberg. Madrid, June.
53.
GomezA.Rodríguez-bailónR.HuiciC.MoyaM.JettenJ. (Submitted for publication). Knowing the others perspective: the relevance of meta-stereotype and values to modify outgroup evaluation.
54.
GómezA.RosM.HuiciC. (Under Preparation). How persistent is the effect of Meta-stereotype information on outgroup evaluation? The mediating impact of time, values and prejudice.
55.
GordijnE. H.BrixL.WijnantsN.KooemenW.FinchilescuG. (Submitted for publication) The relation between prejudice, stereotypes and anticipated affect: Black and White South Africans' perceptions and meta-perceptions. Unpublished manuscript.
56.
HagenM. G.GlaserJ. M. (1993). Black Beliefs about White Opinion and White Beliefs about Black Opinion”. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington DC, September, 2–5.
57.
HarrisM. B.WaschullS.WaltersL. (1990). Feeling fat: Motivations, knowledge, and attitudes of overweight women and men. Psychological Reports, 67, 1191–1202.
58.
Heider, (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374
59.
HeathertonT. F.KleckR. E.HeblM. R.HullJ. G. (2000). The Social Psychology of Stigma.New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
60.
HewstoneM.BrownR. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: an intergroup perspective on the “contact hypothesis”. In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown, Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
61.
HigginsE. T. (1981). Role taking and social judgment: Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. InFlavellJ. H.RossL. (Eds.), Social Cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 119–153). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62.
HodgesS. D.WegnerD. M. (1997). Automatic and controlled empathy. InIckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 311–339). New York: Guilford Press.
63.
IckesW.PattersonM. L.RajeckiD. W.TanfordS. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies.Social Cognition, 1, 160–190.
64.
JonesE. E. (1990). Interpersonal Perception.San Francisco: Freeman.
65.
JonesE. E.FarinaA.HastorfA. H.MarkusH.MillerD. T.ScottR. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships.New York: Freeman.
66.
JuddC. M.ParkB.RyanC. S.BrauerM.KrausM. (1995). Stereotypes and ethnocentrism: Diverging interethnic perceptions of African American and White American youth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 460–481.
67.
KennyD. A. (1988). Interpersonal Perception: A social relations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 247–261.
68.
KennyD. A.AlbrightL. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390–402.
69.
KennyD. A.DepauloB. M. (1993). Do people Know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161.
70.
KennyD. A.La VoieL. (1984). Reciprocity of attraction: A confirmed hypothesis. Social Psychology Quaterly, 45, 54–58.
71.
KleinO.AzziA. (2001). The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: How group members attempt to tailor an outgrpup's representation of themselves. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 279–293.
72.
KramerR. M.MessickD. M. (1998). Getting by With a Little Help From Our Enemies: Collective Paranoia and Its Role in Intergroup Relations. InSedikidesC.SchoplerJ.InskoCH. A.. (Eds.), Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior (pp. 233–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73.
KruegerJ. (1996). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 145–161.
74.
KruegerJ. (1998). Enhancement bias in the description of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 505–516.
75.
KruegerJ.StankeD. (2001). The Role of Self-Referent and Other-Referent Knowledge in Perceptions of Group Characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 878–888.
76.
KruglanskyA. W. (1989). The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395–409.
77.
LearyM. R. (1983). Understanding social anxiety.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
78.
LeeS. J. (1994). Behind the model-minority stereotype: Voices of high-and low-achieving Asian Americans students. Anthropology and Education Quaterly, 25, 413–429
79.
LeibersonS. (1995). Stereotypes: Their consequences for race and ethnic interaction. Research in Race and Ethnic Relations, 4, 113–137.
80.
LeporeL.BrownR. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275–287.
81.
LeyensJ-PH.DésertM.CroizetJ-C.DarcisC. (2000). Stereotype Threat: Are Lower Status and History of Stigmatization Preconditions of Stereotype Threat?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.
82.
LippmanW. (1922). Public opinion.New York: Macmillan.
83.
MajorB.CrockerJ. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. InMackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 345–370). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
84.
MajorB.SchmaderT. (1998). Coping with Stigma through Psychological Disengagement. InSwinJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 219–241). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
85.
MajorB.SpencerS.SchmaderT.WolfeC.CrockerJ. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34–50.
86.
MalloyT. E.AlbrightL. (1990). Interpersonal perception in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 419–428.
87.
MccauleyC.StittC. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929–40.
88.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89.
MertonR. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.
90.
MillerC. T.RothblumE. D.FelicioD.BrandP. (1995). Compensating for stigma: Obese and nonobese women's reactions to being visible. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1093–1106.
91.
MummendeyA.OttenS. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. InStroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology9 (pp. 107–143). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
92.
MummendeyA.OttenS.BlanzM. (1994). Social categorization and intergroup discrimination. The asymmetry in positive versus negative outcome allocations. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 15–30.
93.
OttenS. (Submitted for publication). Why are we so positive?—Another look at ingroup favoritism in minimal intergroup settings.
94.
OttenS.MummendeyA.BlanzM. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568–581.
95.
OysermanD.SwimJ. (2001). Sigma: An Insider's View. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 1, 1–14.
96.
PlantE. A.DevineP. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 121–142.
97.
PomerantzE. M.ChaikenS.TordesillasR. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408–419.
98.
QuinnD. M.CrockerJ. (1998). Vulnerability to the affective consequences of the stigma of overweight. InSwinnJ.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 125–143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
99.
RosenthalR.RubinD. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. The Behavioral and Brian sciences, 3, 377–415.
100.
SchlenkerB. R. (1980). Impression management.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
101.
SchlenkerB. R.WeigoldM. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133–168.
102.
SheldonK. M.JohnsonJ. T. (1993). Forms of social awareness: Their frequency and correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 320–330.
103.
ShraugerJ. S.SchoenemanT. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549–573.
104.
SigelmanL.TuchS. A. (1997). Meta-stereotypes: Black's perceptions of White's stereotypes of Blakc's. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 87–101.
105.
SigelmanL.WelchS. (1994). Black Americans' Views of Racial Inequality: The Dream Deferred.New York: Cambridge University Press.
106.
SmithH. C. (1966). Sensitivity to people.New York: McGraw-Hill.
107.
SpencerS. J.FeinS.WolfeC. T.FongC.DunnM. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139–1152.
108.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
109.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual ability and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
110.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5, 797–811.
111.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 6, 613–629.
112.
SteningB. W.EverettJ. E. (1984), Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 2, 151–156.
113.
StephanW.FinleyK. (1999). The Role of Empathy in Improving Intergroup Relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 4, 729–743.
114.
StephanW.StephanC. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 3, 157–175.
115.
StukasA. A.SnyderM. (2002). Targets' Awareness of Expectations and Behavioral Confirmation in Ongoing Interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38, 31–40.
116.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038–1051.
117.
TajfelH. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–97.
118.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. InWorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall (2nd. Ed.).
119.
TobiasS. (1994). Keep culture from keeping girls out of science. Education Digest, 60, 1, 19–21.
120.
VorauerJ. D. (Submitted for publication). Safety or Vulnerability in Numbers? Intergroup Attitudes Guide Whether the Presence of Other Ingroup Members Fosters More Positive or Negative Reactions to Intergroup Interaction.
121.
VorauerJ. D.ClaudeS. (1998). Perceived versus actual transparency of goals in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 371–385.
122.
VorauerJ.HunterA. J.MainK. J.RoyS. A. (2000). Meta-Stereotype Activation: Evidence From Indirect Measures for Specific Evaluative Concerns Experienced by Members of Dominant Groups in Intergroup Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690–707.
123.
VorauerJ.KumhyrS. (2001). Is This About You or Me? Self-Versus Other-Directed Judgments and Feelings in Response to Intergroup Interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706–719
124.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O'connellG. B. (1998). How Do Individuals Expect to Be Viewed by Members of Lower Status Groups? Content and Implications of Meta-Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 4, 917–937.
125.
VorauerJ. D.MillerD. T. (1997). Failure to recognize the effect of implicit social influence on the presentation of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 281–295.
126.
VorauerJ. D.RossM. (1993). Making mountains out of molehills: An informational goals analysis of self- and social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 620–632.
127.
WeberR.CrockerJ. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961–77.
128.
WeinbergG.RoweD. (1988). The projection principle.New York, NY: Scott Meredith Literary Agency, Inc.
129.
WeinbergG.RoweD. (1996). Cómo somos y cómo nos ven los otros.Barcelona: Gedisa.
130.
WilderD. A. (1984.). Intergroup contact: the typical member and the exception to the rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 177–94.
131.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles of social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.
132.
YamamotoK.DavisO. L.Mceachron-Hirsch. (1983). International Perceptions Across the Sea: Patterns in Japanese Young Adults. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 7, 69–78.
133.
YamamotoK.DibrellL. (1984). The Image of the World Community: a Replication in Japanese College Students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 145–146.
