Desde un marco ecléctico sobre la evaluación psicopedagógica se revisan las investigaciones realizadas sobre el Key-Math Diagnostic Arithmetic Test desde su construcción hasta la actualidad. Dichas investigaciones se han agrupado en cinco líneas: Propiedades psicométricas para la evaluación del rendimiento, utilización en programas instruccionales, estudios con poblaciones especiales, estudios relacionados con el desarrollo cognitivo y estudios sobre versiones revisadas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachorD. G. (1990). KeyMath-Revised (KMR).Diagnostique, 15 (1–4), 87–98.
2.
BannatyneA. (1973). Programs, Materials and Techniques.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6 (3), 8–14.
3.
BaroodyA. J. (1988). El pensamiento matemático de los niños.Madrid: Visor-MEC.
4.
BonsnessJ. (1977). USOE Dissemination review panel report.Lignite, N. Dak: Northwest Special Education.
5.
BreenM. J.LehmanJ.CarlsonM. (1984). Achievement correlates of the Woodcock Jonhson Reading and Mathematics subtest, KeyMath, and Woodcock Reading in an elementary aged learning disabled population.Journal of learning disabilities, 17 (5), 258–261.
6.
CabreraF.EspinF. (1986). Medición y Evaluación Educativa.Barcelona: PPU.
7.
CollC.OnrubiaJ. (1990). Inteligencia, Aptitudes para el aprendizaje y rendimiento escolar. EnCollC.PalaciosJ.MarchesiA. (Comps.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. II. Psicología de la Educación (pp. 161–174). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.
8.
ConnollyA. J. (1988). KeyMath Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
DeLAOrdenA.GaviriaE.FuentesJ.Ly lázaroA. (1993). Modelos de construcción y validación de instrumentos diagnósticos. En Investigación sobre Diferenciación Educativa y Orientación. La dimensión metodológica. VI Seminario de modelos de investigación educativa. AIDIPE, Madrid. 23–25 Sep.
11.
DunnL. M.MarkwardtF. C. (1970). Peabody Individual Achievement Test.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
12.
EavesR. C. (1992). Diagnostic accuracy of the Cognitive Levels Test, The KeyMath Revised and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Revised.Diagnostique, 17, 163–175.
13.
EavesR. C.DarchC.MannL.VanceE. R. (1990). The Cognitive levels Test. Its relationship with reading and mathematics achievement.Pychology in the Schools, 27, 22–28.
14.
EavesR. C.SimpsonR. G. (1984). The concurrent validity of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test relative to the KeyMath Diagnostic Arthmetic Test among adolescents.Psychology in the Schools, 21, 165–168.
15.
EavesR. C.WilliamsP.WinchesterK.DrachC. (1994). Using teacher judgment and IQ to estimate reading and mathematics achievement in a remedial reading program.Psychology in the Schcools, 31, 261–272.
16.
ErfordB.BagleyD.HopperJ.LeeR.PanagopulosK.PrellerD. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Math Essential Skill Screener-Elementary Version (MESS-E).Psychology in the Schools, 35 (2), 127–135.
17.
FerraraB.RedemerM. (1979). Evaluation Report of the title VII Emergence Schools Aid Act Program of the Springfield Public Schools. Sangamon State Univ Springfield, Ill. (78) p.
Gómez arbeoB. M. (1990). Evaluación criterial. Una metodología útil para diagnosticar el nivel de aprendizaje de los alumnos.Madrid: Narcea.
20.
GoodsteinH. A.KahnH.CawleyJ. F. (1976). The achievement of Educable Mentally Retarded Children on the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test.The Journal of Special Education, 10 (1), 61–70.
21.
GreensteinJ.StrainF. S. (1977). The utility of The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test for adolescent learning disabled students.Psychology in the schools, 14 (3), 275- 282.
22.
HillN. C.MinifieD. G.MinifieE. L. (1984). Hadicapped adolescent delinquents Educational Diagnostic and tutoring. Paper pp. 14.
23.
JastakJ. RBijouS. W.JastakS. R (1965). Wide Range Achievement Test.Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates.
24.
JastakB. F.BijouS. W.JastakS. R. (1976). Wide Range Achievement Test.Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates of Delawar.
25.
KrakowJ.CurcioF. (1978). Concrete Operational Development and Arithmetic progress in learning Disabled Boys: Acrosslogged Panel Analysis. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. Washington D.C.
26.
KratochwillT. R. (1976). An examination of the predictive validity of the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and The Wide Range Achievement Test in excepcional children.Psychology in the Schools, 13 (4), 404–406.
27.
LubkeM. (1985): Expert Sistems in the individual education program process. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency (109 th Philadelphia PA, May 27–31).
28.
MaríR. (1998). La Escala KeyMath-R: Estudio de una prueba diagnóstica con referencia curricular.Revista de Investigación Educativa, 16 (1), 71–83.
29.
McculloughB. C.ZarembaB. A. (1979). Standarized achievement test with learning disabled and non learning disabled adolescent boys.Learning Disability Quarterly, 2 (4), 65–70.
30.
MirasM.SoléI. (1990). La evaluación del aprendizaje y la evaluación en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje. EnCollC.PalaciosJ.MarchesiA. (Comps.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación II. Psicología de la Educación (pp. 419–431). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.
31.
PerezK. (1996). A review and critique of the KeyMath-Revised: A Diagnostic Inventory of Essential Mathematics. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Soutwest Educational Research Association. Nueva orleans, LA, January.
32.
PriceP. A. (1984). A Comparative Study of The California Achievement Test (Forms C y D) and the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test with Secondary LH Students.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19 (7), 392–96.
33.
RaschG. (1960). Probabilistic models for some 1ntelligence and attainement test.Copenhagen: Danis Institute for Educational Research.
34.
ReesJ. M.CoyleL. M. (1986). Error descriptions for math test. User's Guide. Disponible en Jocelyn Rees, 201 W. McNeese Street, La. Charles, La 70605.
35.
RivasF. (1980). Proyecto Valencia. Objetivos básicos de aprendizaje en los ciclos y áreas de Lenguaje y Matemáticas en la E.G.B. Una aproximación de evaluación referida a criterio.Valencia: Centro de Publicaciones Universitarias.
36.
RiveraD. P. (1995). Review of current Trends in Mathematics Assessment for students with mild disabilities.Diagnostique, 20 (1–4), 143–174.
37.
RivièreA. (1990). Problemas y dificultades en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas: Una perspectiva cognitiva. EnMarchesiA.CollC.PalaciosJ. (Comps.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación III. Necesidades educativas especiales (pp. 155–182). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.
38.
RoddaH. (1988). Assessment and rehabilitation of severaly socially deprived deaf adults.BaineEn D. (Ed.), Alternative futures for the education of students with severe disabilities. Edmonton, Canada:
39.
RovetJ.SzekelyC.HockemberryM. (1994). Specific Arithmetic Calculation Deficits in Children With Turner Syndrome.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16 (6), 820–839.
40.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ. E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4 th ed). Boston: Hougton Mifflin.
41.
SappG. L.ChissomB. D.HortonW. O. (1984). An investigation of the ability of selected instruments to discriminate areas of exeptional class designation.Psychology in the Schools, 21, 258–263.
42.
SimnerM. L. (1988). Predicting first grade Achievement from errors in printing at the start of Prekindergarten. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the National Association for School Psychologist. Chicago, Il, April 5–10.
43.
SlateJ. R. (1994). Correlation of WISC-III, WRAT-R, KM-R and PPVT-R. Scores in students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities.Research and practice, 9 (2), 104–107.
44.
SlateJ. R. (1996). Interrelations of frequently administered achievement measures in the determination of specific learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities, Research and Pratice, 11 (2), 86–89.
VerdugoM. A. (1995). Evaluación criterial curricular. EnVerdugoM. A., Evaluación Curricular (pp. 534–571). Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.
47.
WeschlerD. (1974). Escala de Inteligencia de Weschler para niños (WISC). Madrid: TEA.
48.
WhiteK.R.CarcelliL. (1982). The efect of item format on students standarized mathematics achievement test scores. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Educational Research Associations. 66 th, Nueva York, NY, March 19–23, 1992.
49.
WoodcockR. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
