El objetivo central de este artículo es analizar las relaciones entre la identidad nacional y el prejuicio hacia otros grupos y naciones. El interés en esta relación se halla en el papel ambivalente que juega la identidad nacional (patriotismo y nacionalismo) en el desarrollo de las personas y la vida de los pueblos. Así, las investigaciones muestran que mientras el patriotismo no predice actitudes hostiles y xenófobas hacia los exogrupos, el nacionalismo sí lo hace. Sin embargo, no se dispone de suficientes investigaciones sistemáticas sobre dicha relación y, además, para dar solidez a los datos, es preciso incorporar al análisis de esta relación variables contextuales relativas a las características y relevancia del exogrupo, las diferencias de estatus y la historia de las relaciones intergrupo.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbdelalR.HerreraY.JohnstonA.McdermottR. (2006). Identity as a variable.Perspectives on Politics, 4, 695–711. Doi: 10.1017/S1537592706060440
2.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality.Nueva York: Harper y Row.
3.
BeckerM.VignolesV.OweE.BrownR.SmithP.EasterbrookM.Yamako LuN. (2012). Culture and the distinctiveness motive: Constructing identity in individualistic and collectivistic contexts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 833–855. Doi: 10.1037/a0026853
4.
BillietJ.MaddensB.BeertenR. (2003). National identity and attitude toward foreigners in a multinational state: A replication.Political Psychology, 24 (2), 241–257. Doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00327
5.
BlankT.SchmidtP. (1997). Konstruktiver patriotismus im vereinigten Deutschland: ergebnisse einer repräsentativen studie [Constructive patriotism in unified Germany: results from a representative study]. EnMummendeyA.SimonB. (Eds.), Identität und Verschiedenheit (pp. 127–148). Berna: Huber. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-83268-9_194
6.
BlankT.SchmidtP. (2003). National identity in a united Germany: nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data.Political Psychology, 24, 289–312. Doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00329
7.
BrewerM. B. (2001). The many faces of social identity: implications for political psychology.Political Psychology, 22 (1), 115–125. Doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00229
8.
CitrinJ.WongC.DuffB. (2000). National identity and ethnic conflict in America. EnAshmoreR. D.JussimL.WilderD. (Eds.), Rutgers series on self and social identity: Vol. 3. Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 71–100). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
9.
CohrsJ. C.DimitrovaD.KalchevskaT.KleinkeS.TomovaI.VasilevaM.MoschnerB (2004). Ist patriotischer nationalstolz wünschenswert? Eine differenzierte analyse seiner psychologischen bedeutung [is patriotic national pride desirable? A differentiated analysis of its psychological meaning].Zeitschriftfür Sozialpsychologie, 35, 201–215. Doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.35.4.201
10.
DemoulinS.LeyensJ. PHPaladinoM. P.Rodríguez-torresR.Rodríguez-pérezA.DovidioJ. F. (2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non-uniquely” emotions.Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71–96. Doi: 10.1080/02699930244000444
11.
FeshbachS.SakanoN. (1997). The structure and correlates of attitudes toward one's nation in samples of United States and Japanese college students: A comparative study. EnBar-TalD.StaubE. (Eds.), Patriotism in the lives of individuals (pp. 91–107). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
12.
FigueiredoR.ElkinsZ. (2003). Are patriots bigots? An inquiy into the vices of in-group pride.American Journal of Political Sciences, 47, 171–188. Doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00012
13.
HerrmannR. K.IserniaP.SegattiP. (2009). Attachment to the nation and international relations: Dimensions of identity and their relationship to war and peace.Political Psychology, 30, 721–754. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00723.x
14.
HeyderA.SchmidtP. (2002). Authoritarianism and ethnocentrism in East and West Germany-Does the system matter? EnAlbaR.SchmidtP.WasmerM. (Eds.), Germans or foreigners? Attitudes toward ethnic minorities in post reunification Germany (pp. 187–210). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
HinkleS.BrownR. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. EnAbramsD.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48–70). Nueva York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
16.
KarasawaM. (2002). Patriotism, nationalism, and internationalism among Japanese citizens: An etic-emic approach.Political Psychology, 23, 645–666. Doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00302
17.
KohnH. (1968). Nationalism. EnSillsD. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 11 (pp. 6370). Nueva York: Macmillan.
18.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Towards a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes.Political Psychology, 10 (2), 257–274. Doi: 10.2307/3791647
19.
LeyensJ. PHPaladinoP.Rodríguez-torresR.VaesJ.DemoulinS.Rodríguez-pérezA.GautR. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197. Doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
20.
LiQ.BrewerM. (2004). What does it mean to be an American? Patriotism, nationalism, and American identity after 9/11.Political Psychology, 25 (5), 727–739. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00395.x
21.
LisbonaA. (2010). Teoría de la identidad social y algunas aplicaciones actuales.Revista de Psicología Social, 25 (2), 185–188. Doi: 10.1174/021347410791063796
22.
MaupassantG. (1965). Bola de sebo, Bel Ami.Barcelona: Credsa.
23.
MorrayJ. P. (1959). Pride of state.Boston: Beacon Press.
24.
MummendeyA.KlinkA.MielkeR.WenzelM.BlanzM. (1999). Socio-structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: results from a field study in East Germany.European Journal of Social Psychology, 29 (2-3), 259–285. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05) 29:2/3<259::AID-EJSP927>3.0.CO;2-F
25.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
26.
SabucedoJ. M.FernándezC. (1998). Nacionalismos e ideología. Un análisis psicosocial.Psicología Política, 17, 7–19.
27.
SchatzR. T.StaubE.LavineH. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism.Political Psychology, 20, 151–174. Doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00140
28.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. Doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
29.
ShawR. P.WongY. (1989). Genetic seeds of warfare: evolution, nationalism and patriotism.Cambridge: University Press.
30.
SherifM. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
SidaniusJ.FeshbachS.LevinS.PrattoF. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance?Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.
32.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139175043
33.
StaubE. (1997). Blind versus constructive patriotism: Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action. EnBar-TalD.StaubE. (Eds.), Patriotism. In the lifes of individuals and nations (pp. 213–228). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615795.047
34.
SumnerW. G. (1906). Folkways: a Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores and Morals.Boston: Ginn.
35.
TajfelH. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice.Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–97. Doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00620.x
36.
TajfelH. (1978). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales.Barcelona: Editorial Herder.
37.
TajfelH.BilligM.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour.European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 149–178. Doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
38.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. EnAustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
39.
TalebN. (2007). Black Swan and Domains of Statistic.The American Statistician, 61 (3), 1–3. Doi: 10.1198/000313007X219996
40.
VikiG. T.CalitriR. (2008). Infrahuman outgroup or suprahuman ingroup: The role of nationalism and patriotism in the infrahumanization of outgroups.European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1054–1061.
41.
WagnerU.BeckerJ. C.ChristO.PettigrewT. F.SchmidtP. (2012). A longitudinal test of the relation between German nationalism, patriotism and outgroup derogation.European Sociological Review, 28, 319–332. Doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq066
42.
ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. Doi: 10.1037/a0016904
