Numerosos estudios sugieren que los niños con problemas evolutivos de coordinación motriz presentan una menor competencia percibida comparada con sus compañeros sin ningún tipo de dificultad. Por ello, el objetivo del estudio fue analizar el impacto de los problemas de coordinación motriz en el autoconcepto físico en 108 escolares de 11 y 12 años de edad. La competencia motriz real se evaluó utilizando la Batería Motriz “Movement ABC”, y el autoconcepto físico a través del cuestionario Physical Self-Perception Profile, que proporcionó una medida multifactorial de la percepción física. Los resultados no mostraron diferencias entre los escolares con o sin problemas de coordinación pero sí se manifestaron diferencias entre los chicos y las chicas en varias de las dimensiones del cuestionario, analizando las posibles interpretaciones, siendo este dato motivo de futuros estudios que confirmen esta situación.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsçiF. (2005). The construct validity of two physical self-concept measures: An example from Turkey.Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2, 1–11.
2.
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (1994). Motor skill disorder 315.40. Developmental coordination disorder.En Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (pp. 53–55). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3.
BalaguerI. (2002). Estilos de vida en la adolescencia.Valencia: Promolibro.
4.
BalaguerI.CastilloI. (2002). Actividad física, ejercicio físico y deporte en la adolescencia temprana. EnBalaguerI. (Ed.), Estilos de vida en la adolescencia (pp. 37–64). Valencia: Promolibro.
5.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy. Toward a unifying theory of behavior change.Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
6.
BoydK. R.HrycaikoD. W. (1997). The effect of a physical activity intervention package on the self-esteem of pre-adolescent and adolescent females.Adolescence, 32 (127), 693–709.
7.
BouffardMWatkinsonE. JThompsonL. PCausgrove-DunnJ. L.RomanowS. K. E. (1996). A test of the Activity Deficit Hypothesis with children with movement difficulties.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 61–73
8.
BuenoM.RuizL. M.GrauperaJ. L.SánchezF. (2001). Análisis comparativo de diferentes procedimientos de detección de los problemas evolutivos de coordinación motriz en escolares de 4 a 6 años.Madrid: CIDE, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
9.
CamachoA.ManzanaresM.Guillén Del CastilloM. (2002). Estudio sobre indicadores de salud relacionados con la actividad física en escolares de 12 a 16 años.Revista Efdeportes, 8, 54 (Consultado el 29 de junio de 2007;http://www.efdepor-tes.com
10.
CantellM. (1998). Developmental Coordination Disorder in adolescence: perceptual-motor, academic and social outcomes of early motor delay.Lancaster: University of Lancaster.
11.
CantellM. H.SmythM. M.AhonenT. P. (1994). Clumsiness in adolescence: Educational, motor, and social outcomes of motor delay detected at 5 years.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 115–129.
12.
CantellM.SmythM. M.AhonenT. P. (2003). Two distinct pathways for developmental coordination disorder: Persistence and resolution.Human Movement Science, 22 (4–5), 413–431.
Causgrove-DunnJ. L. (2000). Goals orientations, perceptions of the motivational climate, and perceived competence of children with movement difficulties.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 1–19.
15.
Causgrove-DunnJ. L.WatkinsonE. J. (1994). A study of the relationship between physical awkwardness and children's perceptions of physical competence.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 275–283.
16.
Causgrove-DunnJ. L.WatkinsonE. J. (2002). Considering motivation theory in the study of Developmental Coordination Disorder. EnCermakS. A.LarkinD. (Ed.), Developmental Coordination Disorder (pp. 188–199). Albany, NY: Delmar, Thompson Learning.
17.
EnnisC. D. (2006) Curriculum: Forming and reshaping the vision of Physical Education in a high need, low demand world of schools. Quest, 58, 41–59
18.
FoxK. R. (1990). The physical self-perception profile.Manual: Northern Illinois University.
19.
FoxK. R. (1997). The Physical Self-Perception Profile manual.DeKalb: Norther Illinois University, Office of Health Promotion.
20.
FoxK. R.CorbinC. D. (1989). The Physical Self-Perception Profile: Development and preliminary validation.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.
21.
GómezM. (2004). Problemas evolutivos de coordinación motriz y percepción de competencia en el alumnado de primer curso de educación secundaria obligatoria en la clase de educación física. Tesis inédita. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Educación.
22.
GómezM.RuizL. M.MataE. (2006). Los problemas evolutivos de coordinación en la adolescencia: análisis de una dificultad oculta.Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 1 (3), 44–54(consultado el día 21 de diciembre de 2006;http://www.cafyd.com/REVISTA/index3.html#)
23.
GubbayS. S. (1975). Clumsy children in normal schools.Medical Journal of Australia, 1, 233–236.
24.
GutiérrezM.MorenoJ. A.SiciliaA. (1999). Medida del auto-concepto físico: una adaptación del PSPP de Fox (1990).En Actas delIV Congrès de les Ciènces de Lesport, L'Educaió Física i la Recreació (pp. 187–198). Lleida: INEFC.
HarterS. (1985). Manual for the Self-perception Profile for Children.Denver: University of Denver.
27.
HarterS. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance and enhancement of self concept in children. EnSulsJ.GreenwaldA. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (vol 3, pp. 136–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
HendersonS. E.MayD. S.UmneyM. (1989). An exploratory study of goal setting behaviour, self-concept and locus of control in children with movement difficulties.European Journal of Special Needs Education, 4 (1), 1–15.
29.
HendersonS. E.SugdenD. A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children.San Antonio TX: Psychological Corporation.
30.
HulmeC.SmartA.MoranG.MckinlayB. (1984). Visual, kinaesthetic and cross-modal judgements of length by clumsy children: A comparison with young normal children.Child: Care, Health and Development, 10, 117–125.
31.
KadesjöB.GillbergC. (1999). Developmental Co-ordination disorder in Swedish 7 years-olds.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 820–828.
32.
KalverboerA. F.De VriesH. J.Van DellenT. (1990). Social behaviour in clumsy children as rated by parents and teachers. EnKalverboerA. F. (Ed.), Developmental biopsychology. Experimental and observational studies in children at risk (pp. 257–269). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
KirbyA.LiskS. (2005). Self perception in young people with DCD.En Actas de Sixth International Conference on Developmental Coordination Disorder (p. 72). Trieste: ISR-DCD International Society for Research into DCD & IRCCS. Instituto per l'infanzia “Burlo Garolofo” Trieste SC. di Neuropsichiatria Infantile.
34.
LosseA.HendersonS. E.EllimanD.HallD.KnightE.JongmansM. (1991). Clumsiness in children—do they grow out of it? A 10-years follow-up study.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 55–68.
35.
MaelandA. F. (1992). Self-esteem in children with and without motor co-ordinations problems.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology of Education, 14 (3), 387–340.
36.
MaïanoC.NinotG.BilardJ. (2004). Age and gender effects on global self-esteem and physical self-perception in adolescents.European Physical Education Review, 10, 53–69.
37.
MataE.RuizL. M.HayJ. (2007). Motor competence and aerobic fitness in spanish secondary schoolchildren.Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis, 12 (supplement), 89–90.
38.
O'dwyerS. (1987). Characteristics of highly and poorly coordinated children.The Irish Journal of Psychology, 8 (1), 1–8.
39.
ParkerH. E.LarkinD. (2003). Children's co-ordination and developmental movement difficulty. EnSavelsbergG.DavidsK.Vander KampJ.BennettS. I. (Eds.), Development of Movement Co-ordination in Children (pp. 107–137). Londres: Routledge.
40.
PiekJ. P.DworcanM.BarretN.Coleman-CarmanR. (2000). Determinants of self-worth in children with and without Developmental Coordination Desorden.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47 (3), 259–271.
41.
PiekJ.EdwardsK. (1997). The identification of children with developmental coordination disorder by class and physical education teachers.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (1), 55–67.
42.
RasmussenP.GillbergC. (2000). Natural outcome of ADHD with developmental coordination disorder at age 22 years: a controlled, longitudinal, community-based study.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1424–1431.
43.
RicoI. (2004). Estructuras de interacción y clima motivacional en la educación física de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Tesis Doctoral inédita. Toledo: Universidad de Castilla La Mancha
44.
RobertsG. C.TreasureD. C. (1992). Children in sport.Sport Science Review, 2, 46–64.
45.
RoseB.LarkinD.BergerB. (1997). Coordination and gender influences on the perceived competence of children.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 14, 210–221.
46.
RuizL. M. (1994). Deporte y Aprendizaje. Procesos de adquisición y desarrollo de habilidades. Madrid. Visor.
47.
RuizL. M. (2005). Moverse con dificultad en la escuela. Introducción a los problemas evolutivos de coordinación motriz.Sevilla: Wanceulen.
48.
RuizL. M.GrauperaJ. L. (2005). A new measure of perceived motor competence for children aged 4 to 6 years.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 131–148.
49.
RuizL. M.GrauperaJ. L.GutiérrezM.MayoralA. (1997). Problemas de coordinación y resignación aprendida en educación física escolar.Madrid: CIDE, Ministerio de Educación.
50.
RuizL. M.GrauperaJ. L.GutiérrezM.MiyaharaM. (2003). The assessment of motor coordination in children with the Movement ABC test: A comparative study among Japan, USA and Spain.International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 15 (1) 22–35.
51.
RuizL. M.GrauperaJ. L. (2005). Un estudio transcultural de la competencia motriz en escolares de 7 a 10 años: Utilidad de la BateríaMovement ABC. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 231, 289–308.
52.
RuizL. M.MataE.JiménezF.MorenoJ. A. (2007). Moverse con dificultad en el gimnasio: Consideraciones en torno a un problema educativo y de salud.Apunts de Medicina de l'Esport, 153, 45–52.
53.
SavelsbergG.DavidsK.Vander KampJ.BennettS. I. (2003). Development of Movement Co-ordination in Children.Londres: Routledge.
54.
SchöemakerM. M.KalverboerA. F. (1994). Social and Affective Problems of Children Who Are Clumsy: How Early Do They Begin?Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 130–140.
55.
ShawL.LevineM. D.BelferM. (1982). Developmental double jeopardy: A study of clumsiness and self-esteem in children with learning problems.Developmental and Behavioural Paediatrics, 3 (4), 191–196.
56.
SkinnerR. A. (2002). Self-Perceptions, Perceived Control and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents al Risk of Developmental Coordination Disorder. Tesis doctoral. School of Psychology, Curtin University of Technology, Australia.
57.
SkinnerR.PlekJ. (2001). Psychological implications of poor motor coordination in children and adolescents.Human Movement Science, 20 (1–2), 73–94.
58.
SonstroemR. J.HarlowL. L.JosephsL. (1994). Exercise and self-esteem: validity of model expansion and exercise associations.Journal of Sport and Exercise psychology, 16, 29–42.
59.
Van RossumJ. H. A.VermeerA. (1990). Perceived competence: A validation study in the field of motoric remedial teaching.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 37, 71–81.
60.
WHO (1992). Classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines.Ginebra: Switzerland.
