El objetivo principal de este trabajo es explorar los procesos de categorización del yo en niveles subordinados y supraordenados en contextos organizacionales y sus antecedentes y resultados actitudinales y conductuales. Dos perfiles diferentes de identificación social en una muestra de profesores de primaria se han propuesto (N = 119), la orientación hacia el subgrupo y la orientación global. Usando modelos de ecuaciones estructurales los resultados muestran que el tamaño del subgrupo, el contacto del subgrupo, la discriminación percibida y la competición entre grupos son predictores relevantes de los perfiles de identificación social. Más aún, la orientación hacia el subgrupo predice el favoritismo endogrupal mientras la orientación global predice las conductas de ciudadanía globales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsD.Randsleyde MouraG. (2001). Organizational identification: Psychological anchorage and turnover. EnHoogM.TerryD. (Eds.), Social Identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 131–147). Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
2.
AshforthB.JohnsonS. (2001). Which Hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple Identities in Organizational Contexts EnHoogM.TerryD. (Eds.), Social Identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
3.
AshforthB.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization.Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.
4.
BrownR.CondorF.MathewsA.WadeG.WilliamsJ. H. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59 (4), 273–287.
5.
BrownR.WilliamsJ. (1984). Group identification: The same thing to all people?Human Relations, 37, 547–564.
6.
ByrneB. (2001). Structural Equation Modelling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument.International Journal of Testing, 1 (1), 55–86.
7.
ChristO.Van DickR.WagnerU.StellmacherJ. (2003). When teachers go the extra-mille: Foci of organizational identifications as determinants of different forms of organizational citizenship behavior among schoolteachers.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329–341.
8.
DuttonJ.DukerichJ.HarquailC. (1994). Organizational images and member identification.Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
9.
EllemersN.De GilderD.HaslamA. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance.Academy of Management Review, 29 (3), 459–478.
10.
EllemersN.De GilderD.VanDENHeuvelH. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 517–730.
11.
EllemersN.KortekaasOuwerkerk (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity.European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389.
12.
HinkleS.BrownR. (1990). Integroup comparisons and social identity: some links and lacunae. EnAbramsD.HoogM. (Eds.), Social identity theory: constructive and critical advances (pp. 44–70). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13.
HinkleS.TaylorL.Fox-CardamoneL. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach.British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305–317.
14.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts.Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
15.
HuiciC.RosM. (1993). Identidad comparativa y diferenciación intergrupal.Psicothema, 5 (Supl.), 225–236.
16.
JohnsonM.MorgesonF.IlgenD. R.MeyerC.LloydJ. (2006). Multiple Professional Identities: Examining Differences in Identification Across Work-related Targets.Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (2), 498–506.
17.
LipponenJ.HelkamaK.JuslinM. (2003). Subgroup identification, superordinate identification and intergroup bias between the subgroupsGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6 (3), 239–250.
18.
LipponenJ.HelkamaK.OlkkonenM.JuslinM. (2005). Predicting the different profiles of organizational identification: A case of shipyard subcontractors.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 97–112.
19.
MaelF.AshforthB. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (1), 103–123.
20.
MaelF.AshforthB. (2001). Identifications in Work, War, Sports, and Religion: Contrasting the Benefits and Risks.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 31 (2), 197–222.
21.
MullenB.BrownR.SmithC. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: Integration.European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.
22.
OakerG.BrownR. (1986). Intergroup relations in a hospital setting: A further test of social identity theory.Human Relations, 39, 767–778.
23.
RodríguezA.BetancorV.RodríguezR.QuilesM.DelgadoN.CoelloE. (2005). El efecto de las identidades con distinto nivel de inclusividad en el prejuicio hacia exogrupos.Psicothema, 17 (3), 441–446.
24.
RosM.HuiciC.GomezA. (2000). Comparative identity, category salience and intergroup relations. EnCapozzaD.BrownR. (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research (pp. 81–95). Thousands Oaks: Sage.
25.
SchmittM. T.EllemersN.BranscombeN. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. EnHaslamA.van KnippenbergD.PlatowM. J.EllemersN. (Eds.), Social Identity at work: Developing theory for Organizational practice (pp. 277–292.). Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
26.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. EnAustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47.). Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
27.
Topa-CantisanoG.PalacíF. J. (2007). Múltiples focos de identificación en las organizaciones: comparación de su poder predictivo sobre los resultados grupales, profesionales y organizacionales.Revista de Psicología Social, 22 (1), 17–29.
28.
Topa-CantisanoG.PalacíF. (2005). Proactividad e identidad organizacional: un análisis multigrupo.Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada., 58 (4), 495–504.
29.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. EnTajfelH. (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.
30.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self—concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. EnLawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122.). Greenwich: JAI Press.
31.
TurnerJ. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self—categorization theories. EnEllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups.Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
33.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 207–226.
34.
Van DickR.WagnerU. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 129–149.
35.
Van DickR.WagnerU.StellmacherJ.ChristO. (2005). Category salience and organizational identification.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 273–285.
36.
Van KnippenbergD. (2000). Work Motivation and Performance: A Social Identity Perspective.Applied Psychology: an International review, 49 (3), 357–371.
37.
Van KnippenbergD.EllemersN. (2004). Social Identity and Group Performance. Identification as the Key to Group-Oriented Effort. EnHaslamA.KnippenbergD. V.PlatowM. J.EllemersN. (Eds.), Social Identity at work. Developing theory for organizational practices (pp. 29–59). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
38.
Van KnippenbergD.Van SchieE. C. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.
