Based on our approach to complex dynamic systems, ambiguity of heuristics is a necessary tool to deal with objective ambiguity and complexity of the real world. I discuss various aspects of ambivalence of heuristics aimed to (a) decrease and (b) increase uncertainty in complex social worlds. Different kinds of asymmetry, paradoxes and contradictions in the creation and use of heuristics for diagnosis, prognosis, and control in social worlds are considered in such socially meaningful areas as stimulation and inhibition of others' development, translation of knowledge and masteries vs. keeping secrecy and ignorance, evaluation of humans' potential to create novelty, etc. Ambiguity of developmental paths related to objective uncertainty of real world, and to ambiguity of the heuristics used in main human activities is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshbyW. R. (1962). Principles of self-organizing systems. InVon FoersterH.ZopfG. W.Jr. (Eds.), Principles of self- organization (pp. 255–278). (Sponsored by Information Systems Branch, U.S. Office of Naval Research).
2.
AsmolovA. G. (1996). KuPturno-istoricheskaya psychologia i konstruirivanie mirov {Cultural-historical psychology and design of worlds.}Moscow: Institute of Practical Psychology. Russian)
3.
BaltesP. B. (1999). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. InLernerR. M.LernerJ. V. (Eds.), Adolescence: Development, diversity and context (Vol. 1. Theoretical foundations and biological bases of development in adolescence, pp. 37–52). New York: Garland.
4.
BauerM. (1995). Towards a functional analysis of resistance. InBauerM. (Ed.), Resistance to New Technology (pp. 393–417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BensonC. (2001). The cultural psychology of self place, morality and art in human worlds. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
DörnerD. (1997). The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations.New York: A Merloyd Lawrence Book.
8.
DruzhininV. N. (2001). Kognitivnye sposobnosti: struktura, diagnostika, razvitie {Cognitive abilities: structure, diagnosis, development}.Moscow: Per Se. (Russian).
9.
FlavellJ. H.MillerP. H.MillerS. A. (1977/2002). Cognitive development.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
FrenschP. A.FunkeJ. (Eds.) (1995). Complex problem solving: the European perspective.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
11.
GalperinP. IADanilovaV. L. (1980). Vospitanie systematicheskogo myshlenia v processe reshenia malyh tvorcheskih zadach [Formation of systemic thinking in solving “small” creative problems].Voprosypsychologii, 1, 31–38. (Russian)
12.
GrachyovG.Mel'nikI. (1999). Manipulirovanie lichnostiu: organizatsia, sposoby i technologii informatsionno-psychologicheskogo vozdeistvia {Manipulating with a personality: organization, methods and technologies of informational and psychological influence). Moscow: Institute of philosophy, Russian academy of sciences. Also available at: http://www.auditorium.ru/books/4047.
13.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence.New York: MC Graw Hill.
14.
HaneyC.BanksW. C.ZimbardoP. G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison.International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97. Also available at: http://www.prisonexp.org/pdf/ijcp1973.pdf.
15.
HaneyC.ZimbardoP. G. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment.American Psychologist, 53, 709–727. Also available at: http://www.prisonexp.org/pdf/ap1998.pdf.
LotmanI. M. (1992). Kul'tura i vzryv {Culture and explosion.]Moscow: Gnosis. Russian)
22.
LöwyI. (1992). The strength of loose concepts—boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: the case study of immunology.History of Science, 30, 90, Part 4, 376–396
23.
MalinetskyG.PotapovA. (1998). Jokery, rusla, ili Poiski tretyei paradigmy [Jokers, channels, or Searches for the third paradigm].Znanie—sila, 3, 19–34. (Russian).
24.
PenroseR. (1989). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics.Oxford, New York, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
25.
Perret-ClermontA.N. (1986). La construction de l'intelligence dans l'interaction sociale.Bern: Peter Lang.
26.
PetukhovV. V. (1999). Problema osmyslennogo deystvia (po resheniu tvorcheskih zadach) [A problem of meaningful action (for solving creative problems)]. InVoiskunskyA. E.ZhdanA. N.TikhomirovO. K. (Eds.), Traditsii i perspectivi deyatel'nostonogo podhoda v psychologii: shkola A.N. Leontieva [Traditions and perspectives of activity approach in psychology: A.N. Leontiev's school] (pp. 235–262). Moscow: Smysl. Russian).
27.
PoddiakovA. N. (2000). Issledovatel'skoe povedenie: Strategii poznania, pomosch', protivodeistvie, konflikt [Exploratory behavior: Cognitive strategies, help, counteraction, and conflict]. Moscow: Educational Internet portal “Obrazovanie: issledovano v mire”. http://www.oim.ru/reader.asp?nomer=50. (Russian).
28.
PoddiakovA. N. (2001.) Counteraction as a crucial factor of learning, education and development: Opposition to help. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2 (3). [On-line: available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01poddiakov-e.htm]
29.
PoddiakovA. N. (2002). The space of responsibility of cultural psychology. Review essay on the book: Benson, C. The cultural psychology of self: place, morality and art in human worlds. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2001. Culture and psychology, 8 (3), 327–336.
30.
PoddiakovA. (2003). Test tvorchestva”sinya” ptitsa psychologii” [Test of creativity-”the “blue bird” of psychology.]Znaniea-'sila, 5, 101–104.
31.
PoddiakovA. (2004). “Trojan horse” teaching in economic behavior. Internet-version of the paper presented at the international conference “Cross-fertilization between economics and psychology”. Drexel University, USA.Social Science Research Network.http://ssrn.com/abstract=627432.
32.
PospelovD. A. (1989). Modelirovanie rassuzhdeniy. Opyt analiza myslitel'nyh aktov {Modeling of reasoning. Experience of analysis of acts of thinking.]Moscow: Radio I sviaz. Russian).
33.
PyatnitsynB. N. (1984). Ob aktivnosti model'nogo poznania [About activity of modeling cognition.] InGorskyD. P. (Ed.), Tvorcheskaya priroda nauchnogo poznania {Creative nature of scientific cognition}.Moscow: Nauka. (Russian).
SunsteinC. R. (March 2003). Moral Heuristics. U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 180. http://ssrn.com/abstract=387941.
36.
TikhomirovO. K. (2002). Psychologia myshlenia {Psychology of thinking}.Moscow: Academia. (Russian).
37.
TorranceE. P. (2003). The Millenium: A time for looking forward and looking back.The journal of secondary gifted education, 15 (1), 6–12.
38.
TsukermanG. A. (1998). Chto razvivaet i chego ne razvivaet uchebnaya deyatel'nost mladshih shkol'nikov? [What is and what is not developed by learning activity in junior schoolchildren?]Voprosy psychologii, 5, 68–81. (Russian)
39.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, 185, 1124–1131.
ValsinerJ. (2000). Culture and human development.London: Sage.
42.
ValsinerJ.DiriwächterR.SauckC. (2005). Diversity in unity: standard questions and nonstandard interpretations. InBibaceR.LairdJ. D.NollerK. L.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Science and medicine in dialogue: Thinking through particulars and universals (pp. 289–307). Westport, CT: Praeger.
43.
ValsinerJ.HillP. E. (1989). Socialization of American toddlers for social courtesy. InValsinerJ. (Ed.), Child development in cultural context (pp. 163—179). Toronto/New York/Bern: Hogrefe & Huber.
44.
VendaV. F. (1990). Systemi hibridnogo intellekta: evolutsia, psychologia, informatika {Systems of hybrid intellect: evolution, psychology, informatics}.Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (Russian).
45.
WEBSTER'S DESK DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (1990). New York: Portland House.
46.
YaroshevskyM. G. (1995). Sotsial'nye i psychologicheskie koordinaty nauchnogo tvorchestva [Social and psychological coordinates of scientific activity].Voprosy filosofi, 12, 118–127. (Russian)
47.
ZagorskyV. (2002, April 30). Stanet li rossiyskaya intelligentsia sovest'iu natsii? [Will the Russian intelligentsia become the ‘nation's consciousness’?]. Russky Zhurnal. Available: http://www.russ.ru/ist_sovr/sumerki/20020430.html. (Russian)
