Abstract
This paper sketches two classes of mathematical models. Both treat ambivalence and attentiveness as undefined terms. The first class, ambivalence-generated models, is finitistic and requires no ontological commitment to any mathematical construction as sophisticated as ‘real numbers’. The intended semantics suggests the axiom underlying topologists’ well-understood theory of finite simplicial complexes (FSCs). Semantically reinterpreted within psychology, this theory yields concrete, empirically testable hypotheses about human behaviour, which in turn suggest further axiomatic restrictions on the models. The second class of models treats attentiveness as a Morse function on some differential manifold, and uses its gradient flow to construct a lower-dimensional spine. Both classes of models have potential to capture much of the flexibility and concreteness that are attractive in qualitative methodologies, while retaining (by application of mathematical analysis) the formality of quantitative methodologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
