As classrooms worldwide are becoming increasingly diverse, teacher education programs need to develop an equity-oriented curriculum, integrating domains of knowledge that prepare all classroom teachers to support the academic content and language learning of immigrant students. The first step of such an effort is to systematically examine the existing curriculum for its strengths and gaps. Using the conceptualizations of culturally and linguistically responsive teachers as an analytical tool, the study critically examined 31 out of 110 course readings required by five teaching methods courses of a US nationally ranked elementary teacher education program. The findings reveal an overall restricted focus on issues of supporting bilingual students and a discrepancy among topics addressed in different subject areas. The study calls for problematizing the “just good teaching” mindset, dismantling the deficit and monolithic portrayal of bilingual communities, acknowledging the complexity of teaching bilingual learners, and striving for conceptual coherence in curriculum reconstruction.
AbediJ. (2007). English language proficiency assessment and accountability under nclb Title iii: An overview. In AbediJ. (Ed.), English language proficiency assessment in the nation: Current status and future practice (pp. 3–12). Davis, CA: The Regents of the University of California.
2.
AthanasesS. Z., & de OliveiraL. C. (2010). Toward program-wide coherence in preparing teachers to teach and advocate for English language learners. In LucasT. (Ed.), Preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 195–215). Florence, US: Routledge.
3.
AthanasesS. Z., WahleithnerJ. M., & BennettL. H. (2013). Learning about English learners’ content understandings through teacher inquiry: Focus on writing. The New Educator, 9(4), 304–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2013.841506.
4.
AugustD., GoldenbergC., SaundersW. M., & DresslerC. (2010). Recent research on English language and literacy instruction: What we have learned to guide practice for English language learners in the 21st century. In ShatzM. & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), The education of English language learners: Research to practice (pp. 272–297). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
BabbieE. R. (2010). The basics of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
6.
BalderramaM. V. (2001). The (mis) preparation of teachers in the Proposition 227 era: Humanizing teacher roles and their practice. The Urban Review, 33(3), 255–267.
7.
BanksJ., Cochran-SmithM., MollL., RichertA., ZeichnerK., LePageP., Darling-HammondL., DuffyH., & McDonaldM. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 232–274). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BartoloméL. I. (2002). Creating an equal playing field: Teachers as advocates, border crossers, and cultural brokers. In BeykontZ.F. (Ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference (pp. 167–191). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
9.
BunchG. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing general education teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772.
10.
CannonS. (2016). Exploratory content analysis of candidates’ perspectives on multicultural education as evidenced in their edTPA portfolios (Publication No. 1968426649) [Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
11.
CatalanoT., & HamannE. T. (2016). Multilingual pedagogies and pre-service teachers: Implementing “language as a resource” orientations in teacher education programs. Bilingual Research Journal, 39(3-4), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2016.1229701.
12.
CoadyM. R., HarperC., & de JongE. J. (2015). Aiming for equity: Preparing general education teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms?tesol Quarterly, 50(2), 340–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.223.
13.
Cochran-SmithM. (2003). The multiple meanings of multicultural teacher education: A conceptual framework. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(2), 7–26.
14.
ColomboM., McMakinD., JacobsC., & ShestokC. (2013). Hopefulness for teachers for ell s in the era of nclb. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2013.781358.
15.
DanielS., & PeercyM. M. (2014). Expanding roles: Teacher educators’ perspectives on educating English learners. Action in Teacher Education, 36(2), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2013.864575.
16.
Darling-HammondL., HammernessK., GrossmanP., RustF., & ShulmanL. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
de JongE. J., & HarperC. A. (2005). Preparing general education teachers for English-language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough?Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 101–124.
18.
de JongE. J., & HarperC. A. (2008). esl is good teaching “plus.” In BriskM. E. (Ed.), Language, culture, and community in teacher education (pp. 127–148). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
de JongE. J., HarperC. A., & CoadyM. R. (2013). Enhanced knowledge and skills for elementary general education teachers of English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 89–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770326.
20.
de OliveiraL., & AthanansesD. (2007). Graduates’ reports of advocating for English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(3), 202–215. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487107299978.
21.
DurgunoğluA. Y., & HughesT. (2010). How prepared are the US preservice teachers to teach English language learners?International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 32–41.
22.
EberlyM.B., NewtonS.E., WigginsR.A. (2001). The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. The Journal of General Education, 50(1), 56–74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jge.2001.0003.
23.
EchevarriaJ., Richards-TutorC., CangesR., & FrancisD. (2011). Using the siop model to promote the acquisition of Language and science concepts with English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 334–351. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.623600.
24.
EchevarriaJ., & VogtM. (2010). Using the siop Model to improve literacy for English learners. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 8–15.
GalgueraT. (2011). Participant structures as professional learning tasks and the development of pedagogical language knowledge among preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 85–106.
27.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st Century: A global perspective. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Pub.
28.
GarcíaE., AriasM. B., MurriN. J. H., & SernaC. (2010). Developing responsive teachers: A challenge for a demographic reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347878.
GreenfieldR. A. (2016). Educating linguistically diverse students: A mixed-methods study of elementary teachers’ coursework, attitudes, and practice. Current Issues in Education, 19(1), 1–28.
35.
GuoS. (2014). Revisioning education for all in the age of migration: Global challenges and opportunities for lifelong learning. International Review of Education /Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft /Revue Internationale De L'Education, 60(4), 481–497. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9441-1.
HillM., CowieB., GilmoreA., & SmithL. F. (2010). Preparing assessment-capable teachers: What should preservice teachers know and be able to do?Assessment Matters, 2, 43–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.18296/am.0085.
38.
HoffmanJ. V., WilsonM. B., MartinezR. A., & SailorsM. (2011). Content analysis: The past, present, and future. In DukeN. K. & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 28–49). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
39.
HollinsE., & GuzmanM. T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In M. Cochran-Smith & ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report to the aera panel on research and teacher education (pp. 477–548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
HutchinsonM. (2013). Bridging the gap: Preservice teachers and their knowledge of working with English language learners. tesol Journal, 4(1), 25–54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesj.51.
41.
KapustkaK. M., HowellP., ClaytonC. D., & ThomasS. (2009). Social justice in teacher education: A qualitative content analysis of ncate conceptual frameworks. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903260101.
42.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465.
43.
LiG., BianY., & MartinezJ. M. (2018). “I don't have the resources to learn, or… the time to do that”: Teacher educators’ perspectives and practices of preparing pre-service teachers for English language learners. In LopezA. E. & E. L. Olan (Eds.), Transformative pedagogies for teacher education: Moving towards critical praxis in an era of change. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
44.
LucasT., de OliveiraL. C., & VillegasA. M. (2014). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers in multilingual contexts. In MahboobA. & BarrattL. (Eds.), English in multilingual contexts: Language variation and education (pp. 219–230). New York City, NY: Springer Publishing.
45.
LucasT., & GrinbergJ. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of general education classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS., & McIntyreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 606–636). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
LucasT., & VillegasA. M. (2010). The missing piece in teacher education: The preparation of linguistically responsive teachers. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 109(2), 297–318.
47.
LucasT., & VillegasA. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In LucasT. (Eds.), Teacher education for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 55–72). New York, NY: Routledge
48.
LucasT., & VillegasA. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770327.
49.
LucasT., VillegasA. M., & Freedson-GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110.
50.
MannD. A. (2016). Preparing pre-service teachers to education emergent bilingual students: A textual analysis of teacher education curriculum in elementary-level language arts methods textbooks (Publication No. 10583061) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
51.
MooreM. (2018). Learning to teach bilingual students: How teacher candidates appropriate linguistically responsive practices. Action in Teacher Education, 40(3), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1486749.
PandyaJ. Z. (2012). Unpacking pandora's box: Issues in the assessment of English learners’ literacy skill development in multimodal classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00124.
54.
PearsonM. (2015). Modeling universal design for learning techniques to support multicultural education for pre-service secondary educators. Multicultural Education, 22(3-4), 27–34.
55.
PereiraN., & de OliveiraL. C. (2015). Meeting the linguistic needs of high-potential English language learners: What teachers need to know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(4), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915569362.
56.
Rolón-DowR. & ChenL. (2014). Developing Linguistically Responsive Teachers: Learning through Latino/a Student Stories. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 8(1), 50–59.
57.
SchleppegrellM. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317. SchreierM. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
58.
ShoffnerM., & de OliveiraL. C. (2017). Courageous literacy: Linguistically responsive teaching with English language learners. Voices from the Middle, 24(3), 44–47.
59.
TanakaJ. (2019). Qualitative content analysis of reflection in language teacher practicum settings. (Publication No. 2396824110) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
60.
TéllezK., & WaxmanH. C. (2006). Preparing quality educators for English Language Learners: An overview of the critical issues. In K. Téllez & H. C. Waxman (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practices (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
TummonsJ. (2014). Professional standards in teacher education: Tracing discourses of professionalism through the analysis of textbooks. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 19(4), 417–432. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2014.955634.
66.
TurkanS., de OliveiraL., LeeO., & PhelpsG. (2014). Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(3), 1–30.
67.
VillegasA. M., & LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001003.
68.
WalkerA., ShaferJ., & LiamsM. (2004). “Not in my classroom”: Teacher attitudes towards English language learners in the general education classroom. nabe Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 130–160.
69.
WalquiA. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 159–180.
70.
WangS., LangN., BunchG. C., BaschS., McHughS. R., HuitzilopochtliS., & CallananM. (2021). Dismantling persistent deficit narratives about the language and literacy of culturally and linguistically minoritized children and youth: Counter-possibilities. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.641796.
71.
WatsonS., MillerT., DriverJ., RutledgeV., & McAllisterD. (2005). English language learner representation in teacher education textbooks: A null curriculum?Education, 126(1), 148–157.
YanoffE., LaDukeA., & LindnerM. (2014). Common Core standards, professional texts, and diverse learners: A qualitative content analysis. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 24, 7–27.
74.
ZainuddinH., & MooreR. A. (2004). Engaging pre-service teachers in action research to enhance awareness of second language learning and teaching. Teacher Education and Practice, 17(3), 311–327.
75.
ZhouW., & LiG. (2015). Chinese language teachers’ expectations and perceptions of American students’ behavior: Exploring the nexus of cultural differences and classroom management. System, 49, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.10.011.
76.
Appendix A
77.
List of course readings about emergent bilinguals analyzed in the study
78.
Agarwal-RangnathR., DoverA. G., & HenningN. (2016). Preparing to teach social justice: Becoming a renegade.New York: Teachers College Press. Chapter 3 (pp. 35–53).
79.
Avenia-TapperB., HaasA., & HollimonS. (2016). Explicitly speaking: An instructional routine to support students’ science language development. Science and Children, 53(8), 42–46.
FernandesA., AnhaltC. O., & CivilM. (2009). Mathematical interviews to assess Latino students. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(3), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.16.3.0162.
83.
FloresN., & BeardsmoreH. B. (2015). Programs and structures in bilingual and multilingual education. In WrightW. E., BounS., & O. García (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education (pp 203-222). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
84.
FultonL. & PoeltlerE. (2013). Developing a scientific argument: Modeling and practice help students build skills in oral and written discourse. Science and Children, 50, 30–35.
85.
GibbonsP. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Chapters 1, 3, and 6 (pp. 1-22, 49-78,135-181).
MartinD. B. (2009). Does race matter?Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(3), 134–139.
89.
McDuffieA. R., WohlhuterK. A., & BreyfogleM. L. (2011). Tailoring tasks to meet students’ needs. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(9), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.16.9.0550.
90.
MichaelsS., ShouseA. W., & SchweingruberH. (2007). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Chapter 5 (pp. 87–108).
91.
MillerS. P., & HudsonP. J. (2006). Helping students with disabilities understand what mathematics means. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603900105.
92.
OslerJ. (2007, October 16). A guide for integrating issues of social and economic justice into mathematics curriculum. Radical Math. Retrieved from http://www.radicalmath.org/docs/SJMathGuide.pdf.
93.
PrayL., & MonhardtR. (2009). Sheltered instruction techniques for ells. Science and Children, 46(7), 34–38.
94.
RamírezP. C., & Jiménez-SilvaM. (2014). Secondary English language learners: Strengthening their literacy skills through culturally responsive teaching. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 50, 65–69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2014.900846.
95.
RoseberyA., & BallengerC. (2008). Essay: Creating a foundation through student conversation. In RoseberyA. & BallengerC. (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (PP. 10–11). Arlington, VA: nsta Press.
96.
RossD., FisherD., & FreyN. (2009). The art of argumentation: Fourth graders practice with language frames to learn the process of argumentation in inquiry-based instruction. Science and Children, 47(3), 28–31.
97.
SalinasC., FranquizM. E. & GubermanS. (2006). Introducing historical thinking to second language learners: Exploring what students know and what they want to know. The Social Studies, 97(5), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.97.5.203-207.
98.
SmithM. S., BillV., & HughesE. K. (2008). Thinking through a lesson: Successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 132–138.
99.
SylvesterP. S. (1994). Elementary school curricula and urban transformation. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 309-331
100.
Torres-VelasquezD., & LoboG. (2004). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching and English language learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(5), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.11.5.0249.
101.
TurnerE. E., & BeatrizT.Font Strawhun. (2007). Posing problems that matter: Investigating school overcrowding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(9), 457–463.
102.
WingertK. (2016, May). How to design assessments for emergent bilingual students. stem Teaching Tools. Retrieved from http://stemteachingtools.org/brief/33.
103.
WinklerE. (2009). Children are not colorblind: How young children learn race. pace: Practical Approaches for Continuing Education, 3(3), 1–8.
