Identifying Personality Features Related to Religious Vocation: A Comparison between Seminarians and their Peers Using the NEO Personality Inventory (Revised)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2010
Identifying Personality Features Related to Religious Vocation: A Comparison between Seminarians and their Peers Using the NEO Personality Inventory (Revised)
Do seminarians tend to exhibit a psychological structure that differs from that of their peers? Besides the ideals and motivations behind the religious call, are there personality factors that distinguish seminarians, and perhaps predispose them to choose this religious vocation? Building on previous research with the use of NEO PI-R, and analyzing data obtained from 62 male seminarians and 49 male and 51 female psychology students, this study addresses this question. Significant differences were found on all personality factors except Neuroticism, with the seminarians most notably scoring higher on Agreeableness and Conscientiousness and lower on Openness to Experience. Besides confirming the usefulness of the Five Factor Model (FFM) for the study of religion, the results shed light on possible differences between religion and spirituality.
AlettiM. (1992). Psicologia, psicoanalisi e religione: Studi e ricerche.Bologna: Edizioni Dehoni-ane Bologna.
2.
BensonP.L., DonahueM.J., & EricksonJ.A. (1993). The Faith maturity scale: Conceptualization, measurement and empirical validation.Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 1–26.
3.
CostaP.T., & McCraeR.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
4.
CostaP.T., & McCraeR.R. (2008). The NEO Inventories. In ArcherR.P., & SmithS.R. (Eds.), A guide to personality assessment: Evaluation, application, and integration (pp. 213–246). Mah-wah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
EllisonC.W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.
6.
GodinA. (1975). Psychologie de la vocation: un bilan.Paris: Edition du Cerf.
7.
GorsuchR.L. (1988). Psychology of religion.Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 201–221.
8.
GorsuchR.L., & VenableG.D. (1983). Development of an “age universal” I-E scale.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 181–187.
9.
HoodR.W. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 29–41.
10.
HuntR.A., HinkleJ.E.Jr., & MalonyH.N. (Eds.). (1990). Clergy assessment and career development.Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
11.
KosekR.B. (2000). The desire of God. An assessment of seminarians’ spirituality through the lens of the “Big Five.”Pastoral Psychology, 49, (1), 43–50.
12.
LothsteinL.M. (1990). Can a sexually addicted priest return to ministry after treatment? psychological issues and possible forensic solutions,The Catholic Lawyer, 34(1), 89–113.
13.
MalonyH.N. (1995). The Psychology of religion for ministry, Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 89–104.
14.
MalonyH.N. (2000). The Psychological Evaluation of Religious Professionals,Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(5), 521–525.
15.
MilanesiG., & AlettiM. (1977). Psicologia della Religione.Torino: Elle Di Ci.
16.
PiedmontR.L. (1996b, August). Strategies for using the five-factor model in religious research. In R.L. Piedmont (Chair), The five-factor model and its value for religious research. Symposium presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17.
PiedmontR.L. (1998). The revised NEO Personality Inventory: clinical and research applications,New York: Plenum Press, 234.
18.
PiedmontR.L. (2005). The role of personality in understanding religious and spiritual constructs. In PaloutzianR.F., & ParkC.L. (Eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, New York: The Guilford Press, 253–273.
19.
PiedmontR.L., WilliamsJ.E.G., & CiarrocchiJW. (1997). Personality correlates of one's image of Jesus: Historiographic analysis using the five-factor model of personality.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 364–373.
20.
RodgersonT.E., & PiedmontR.L. (1988). Assessing the Incremental Validity of the Religious Problem-Solving Scale in the prediction of clergy burnout.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(3): 517–527.
21.
RullaL.M. (1971). Depth psychology and vocation: A psycho-social perspective, Rome: Gregorian University Press.
22.
RullaL.M., ImodaF., & RidickJ, (1976). Entering andleaving vocation: Intrapsychic dynamics, Rome: Gregorian University Press.
23.
SaroglouV. (2002). Religion and the five-factors of personality: A meta-analytic review.Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.
