In this presentation, I delineate five refinements that I and my associates have introduced during the last decade to the literature on religion and spirituality from an attachment-theory perspective. First, I describe the principle of social correspondence as an addition to the idea that religiousness reflects generalizing working models of attachment. Second, I focus on what we have learned from studying implicit processes and utilizing experimental designs in religion-as-attachment research. Third, I describe results from research projects that have used developmentally validated attachment assessments, such as the Adult Attachment Interview. Fourth, I emphasize the need for engaging a wider developmental range in religion-as-attachment research and sum up what we have found using non-adult samples. Finally, I argue for employing a wider research perspective on the attachment-religion/spirituality connection than the central parameters of an attachment framework would suggest, by considering possible mediators between attachment and religious or spiritual outcomes.
AinsworthM.D.S. (1985). Attachments across the life-span. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61, 792–812.
2.
AinsworthM.D.S.BleharM.C.WatersE. & WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
ArgyleM. & Beit-HallahmiB. (1975). The social psychology of religion.London: Routledge & Kegan.
4.
BirgegardA. & GranqvistP. (2004). The correspondence between attachment to parents and God: Three experiments using subliminal separation cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1122–1135.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger.New York: Basic Books.
7.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression.New York: Basic Books.
8.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base.NY: Basic Books.
9.
BrownS.L.NesseR.M.HouseJ.S. and UtzR.L. (2004) Religion and emotional compensation: Results from a prospective study of widowhood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1165–1174.
10.
CarlsonE.A. (1998). A prospective longitudinal study of attachment disorganization/disorientation. Child Development, 69, 1107–1128.
11.
CassibbaR. & GranqvistP.CostantiniA. & GattoS. (2008). Attachment and God representations among lay Catholics, priests, and religious: A matched comparison study based on the Adult Attachment Interview. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1753–1763.
12.
CassidyJ. & ShaverP.R. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications.New York: Guilford.
13.
CicirelliV.G. (2004). God as the ultimate attachment figure for older adults. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 371–388.
14.
De WolffM.S. & Van IJzendoornM.H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571–591.
15.
GranqvistP. (1998). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: On the question of compensation or correspondence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 350–367.
16.
GranqvistP. (2002). Attachment and religiosity in adolescence: Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 260–270.
17.
GranqvistP. (2005). Building a bridge between attachment and religious coping: Tests of moderators and mediators. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 8, 35–47.
18.
GranqvistP. (2009). Disorganized attachment, absorption, and mystical experiences—another mediational model. Paper presented at the International Association for the Psychology of Religion meeting, Vienna, Austria, August 23-27.
19.
GranqvistP.FranssonM. & HagekullB. (2009). Disorganized attachment, absorption, and New Age spirituality—A mediational model. Attachment and Human Development, 11, 385–403.
20.
GranqvistP.FredriksonM.UngeP.HagenfeldtA.ValindS.LarhammarD. & LarssonM. (2005). Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of weak complex transcranial magnetic fields. Neuroscience Letters, 379, 1–6.
21.
GranqvistP. & HagekullB. (1999). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 254–273.
22.
GranqvistP. & HagekullB. (2001). Seeking security in the new age: On attachment and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 529–547.
23.
GranqvistP. & HagekullB. (2003). Longitudinal predictions of religious change in adolescence: Contributions from the interaction of attachment and relationship status. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 793–817.
24.
GranqvistP.IvarssonT.BrobergA.G. & HagekullB. (2007). Examining relations between attachment, religiosity, and New Age spirituality using the Adult Attachment Interview. Developmental Psychology, 43, 590–601.
25.
GranqvistP. & KirkpatrickL.A. (2008). Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In CassidyJ. & ShaverP.R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. (2nd ed.) (pp. 906–933). New York: Guilford.
26.
GranqvistP.LjungdahlC. & DickieJ. (2007). God is nowhere, God is now here: Attachment activation, security of attachment, and God proximity among 5-7 year-old children. Attachment & Human Development, 9, 55–71.
27.
GranqvistP. & MainM. (2003). The Attachment to God Interview. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
28.
GranqvistP.MikulincerM. & ShaverP.R. (2009). Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 223–250.
29.
HesseE. (2008). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In CassidyJ. & ShaverP.R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. (2nd ed.) (pp. 552–598). New York: Guilford.
30.
HesseE. & Van IJzendoornM.H. (1999). Propensities towards absorption are related to lapses in the monitoring of reasoning or discourse during the Adult Attachment Interview: A preliminary investigation. Attachment and Human Development, 1, 67–91.
31.
HillP.C. & GibsonN.J.S. (2008). Whither the roots? Achieving conceptual depth in the psychology of religion. Archives for the Psychology of Religion, 30, 19–35.
32.
HoodR.W.Jr.HillP.C. & SpilkaB. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.).New York: Guilford.
33.
JonesJ.W. (2008). Blood that cries out from the earth: The psychology of religious terrorism.New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
KaplanN. (1987). Individual differences in 6-year olds’ thoughts about separation: Predicted from attachment to mother at age 1. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
35.
KirkpatrickL.A. & ShaverP.R. (1990). Attachment theory and religion: Childhood attachments, religious beliefs and conversions. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 315–334.
36.
KirkpatrickL.A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion.New York: Guilford.
37.
MainM. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) models of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In ParkesC.M. & Stevenson-HindeJ. (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127–159). London and New York: Tavistock/Routledge.
38.
MainM.GoldwynR. & HesseE. (2003). Adult attachment scoring and classification systems. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
39.
MikulincerM.GurwitzV.ShaverP.R. & GranqvistP. (2008). Attachment security and the use of God as a safe haven: New experimental findings. Manuscript in preparation.
40.
MikulincerM. & ShaverP.R. (2007). Attachment patterns in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change.New York: Guilford Press.
41.
RizzutoA.-M. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
42.
SroufeL.A. & WatersE. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 1184–1199.
43.
StaytonD.HoganR. & AinsworthM.D.S. (1971). Infant obedience and maternal behavior: The origins of socialization reconsidered. Child Development, 42, 1057–1069.
44.
Van IJzendoornM.H. & Bakermans-KranenburgM.J. (1996). Attachment representations in mothers, fathers, adolescents, and clinical groups: A meta-analytic search for normative data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 8–21.
45.
Van IJzendoornM.H.VereijkenC.M.Bakermans-KranenburgM.J. & Riksen-WalravenJ.M. (2004). Assessing attachment security with the Attachment Q Sort: Meta-analytic evidence for the validity of the observer AQS. Child Development, 75, 1188–1213.
46.
WulffD.M. (2006). Commentary: How attached should we be to attachment theory?International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16, 29–36.
