A review of recent research suggests that academic and popular distinctions between “religion” and “spirituality” are unfounded. Working from a meaning systems perspective, it is argued that recognizing that “religious” and “spiritual” are part of the same broad category does not go far enough. It is argued that a wider perspective that considers the interplay of many different cultural and social factors on both beliefs and practices is more useful. This broadening of the multi-level, interdisciplinary paradigm to examine all existential cultures, including the secular and non-religious, offers the potential to better understand the complexity and diversity of lived religion. Increased use of idiographic methodologies and a more reflective approach to the constructs used in nomothetic methodologies are advocated as a way to advance the field and better explore beliefs and practices in a more ecologically valid way.
AltemeyerB., & HunsbergerB. (1997). Amazing conversions: Why some turn to faith and others abandon religion.Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
2.
AmmermanN. T. (2013). Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 258–278. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12024.
3.
AmmermanN. T. (2014). Finding religion in everyday life. Sociology of Religion, 75(2), 189–207. doi: 10.1093/socrel/sru013.
4.
AtenJ. D., & HernandezB. C. (2005). A 25-year review of qualitative research published in spiritually and psychologically oriented journals. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 24(3), 266–277. http://caps.net/membership/publications/jpc.
5.
BaileyE. I. (1999). Implicit religion: An introduction.London, England: Middlesex University Press.
6.
BarrettJ. L. (2013). Exploring religion's basement: The cognitive science of religion. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 234–255). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
7.
BarrettL. F. (2012). Emotions are real. Emotion, 12(3), 413–429. doi: 10.1037/a0027555.
8.
BaumeisterR. F. (1991). Meanings of life.New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
9.
Beit-HallahmiB. (2014). Resisting the match between religion and “spirituality”. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 5(2), 118–123. doi: 10.1080/2152599x.2014.891250.
10.
BergerP. L., & LuckmannT. A. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.London, England: The Penguin Press.
11.
BerghuijsJ.BakkerC., & PieperJ. (2013). Conceptions of spirituality among the Dutch population. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 35(3), 369–397. doi: 10.1163/15736121-12341272.
BoyerP. (2002). Religion explained: The human instincts that fashion gods, spirits and ancestors.London, England: Vintage.
14.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
15.
BrunerJ. S. (1990). Acts of meaning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ChavesM. (2010). Rain dances in the dry season: Overcoming the religious congruence fallacy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01489.x.
17.
DavisE. B.CuthbertA. D.HaysL. W.AtenJ. D.Van TongerenD. R.HookJ. N., … BoanD. (2016). Using qualitative and mixed methods to study relational spirituality. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(2), 92–98. doi: 10.1037/rel0000046.
18.
DawkinsR. (2006). The God delusion.London, England: Bantam Press.
19.
DayA. (2011). Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
DurkheimÉ. (2008). The elementary forms of religious life (C. Cosman, Trans.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1912)
22.
EmmonsR. A., & PaloutzianR. F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 377–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145024.
23.
EriksonE. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle.New York, NY: WW Norton & Co.
24.
FariasM. (2013). The psychology of atheism. In BullivantS., & RuseM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 468–482). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25.
FitzgeraldT. (1990). Hinduism and the “world religion” fallacy. Religion, 20(2), 101–118. doi: 10.1016/0048-721x(90)90099-r.
26.
FitzgeraldT. (2000). The ideology of religious studies.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27.
FowlerJ. W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins Publishers.
28.
GallT. L.MaletteJ., & Guirguis-YoungerM. (2011). Spirituality and religiousness: A diversity of definitions. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 13(3), 158–181. doi: 10.1080/19349637.2011.593404.
29.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays.New York, NY: New York, Basic Books.
30.
GellnerD. N., & HausnerS. L. (2013). Multiple versus unitary belonging: How Nepalis in Britain deal with “religion.” In DayA.VincentG., & CotterC. R. (Eds.), Social identities between the sacred and the secular (pp. 75–88). New York, NY: Ashgate Publishing.
31.
GergenK. J. (1971). Concept of self.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
32.
GorskiP. S. (2003). Historicizing the secularization debate: An agenda for research. In DillonM. (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 110–122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
GorsuchR. L. (1993). Religion and prejudice: Lessons not learned from the past. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3(1), 29–31. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0301_4.
34.
GuthrieS. E. (1996). Religion: What is it?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(4), 412. doi: 10.2307/1386417.
35.
HeineS. J.ProulxT., & VohsK. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88–110. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1.
36.
HicksJ. A., & KingL. A. (2009). Meaning in life as a subjective judgment and a lived experience. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 638–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00193.x.
37.
HoltA. (2011). Discourse analysis approaches. In FrostN. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (pp. 66–91). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
38.
HoodB. M. (2011). The self illusion.London, England: Constable.
39.
HoodR. W., & BelzenJ. A. (2013). Research methods in the psychology of religion and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 75–93). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
40.
HoodR. W.HillP. C., & SpilkaB. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
41.
JamesW. (2004). The Varieties of Religious Experience.New York, NY: Barnes & Noble. (Original work published 1902).
42.
JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS., & WeinerB. (Eds.). (1974). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior.Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
43.
JostJ. T., & KruglanskiA. W. (2002). The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 168–187. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0603_1.
44.
JungC. G. (1969). Analytical psychology and weltanschauung (G. Adler, & R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In The structure and dynamics of the psyche (2nd ed.) (pp. 358–381). Abingdon, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1931).
45.
KahnemanD. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697.
46.
KahnemanD. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow.London, England: Penguin Press/Classics.
47.
KapuscinskiA. N., & MastersK. S. (2010). The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(4), 191–205. doi: 10.1037/a0020498.
48.
KeganR. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
KellerB.KleinC.Swhajor-BiesemannA.SilverC. F.HoodR., & StreibH. (2013). The semantics of ‘spirituality’ and related self-identifications: A comparative study in Germany and the USA. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 35(1), 71–100. doi: 10.1163/15736121-12341254.
50.
KeysarA. (2014). Shifts along the American religious-secular spectrum. Secularism and Nonreligion, 3(1), 1–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/snr.am.
51.
La CourP.AuskerN. H., & HvidtN. C. (2012). Six understandings of the word ‘spirituality’ in a secular country. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34(1), 63–81. doi: 10.1163/157361212x649634.
52.
LeeL. (2015). Recognizing the non-religious: Reimagining the secular.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
53.
LuhrmannT. M. (1991). Persuasions of the witch's craft: Ritual magic in contemporary England.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
LuhrmannT. M. (2012). When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with god.New York, NY: Vintage Books.
55.
MartelaF., & StegerM. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623.
56.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346.
57.
MastersK. S., & HookerS. A. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and health. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 519–539). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
58.
MaxwellJ. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
59.
McCauleyR. N., & CohenE. (2010). Cognitive science and the naturalness of religion. Philosophy Compass, 5(9), 779–792. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00326.x.
60.
McGuireM. B. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
MortariL. (2015). Reflectivity in research practice: An overview of different perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–9. doi: 10.1177/1609406915618045.
62.
NewmanE. J., & LindsayD. S. (2009). False memories: What the hell are they for?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 1105–1121. doi: 10.1002/acp.1613.
63.
NolasS.-M. (2011). Grounded theory approaches. In FrostN. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (pp. 16–43). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
64.
OmanD. (2013). Defining religion and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
65.
OwenS. (2011). The world religions paradigm: Time for a change. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(3), 253–268. doi: 10.1177/1474022211408038.
66.
PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (2013). Recent progress and core issues in the science of the psychology of religion and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
67.
PargamentK. I. (1992). Of means and ends: Religion and the search for significance. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(4), 201–229. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0204_1.
68.
ParkC. L. (2011). Implicit religion and the meaning making model. Implicit Religion, 14(4), 405–419. doi: 10.1558/imre.v14i4.405.
69.
ParkC. L. (2013). Religion and meaning. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 357–379). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
70.
ParkC. L.EdmondsonD., & Hale-SmithA. (2013). Why religion? Meaning as motivation. In PargamentK. I. (Ed.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (pp. 157–171). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
71.
ParkC. L., & SlatteryJ. M. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and mental health. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 540–559). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
72.
PietkiewiczI., & SmithJ. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14. doi: 10.14691/cppj.20.1.7.
73.
PotterJ., & EdwardsD. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In RobinsonP. W., & GilesH. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 103–118). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
74.
RizzutoA.-M. (1981). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
RizzutoA.-M. (1991). Religious development: A psychoanalytic point of view. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1991(52), 47–60. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219915205.
76.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values.New York, NY: The Free Press.
77.
SchnellT. (2003). A framework for the study of implicit religion: The psychological theory of implicit religiosity. Implicit Religion, 6(2), 86–104. doi: 10.1558/imre.v6i2.86.
78.
SchnellT. (2012). On method: A foundation for empirical research on implicit religion. Implicit Religion, 15(4), 407–422. doi: 10.1558/imre.v15i4.407.
79.
SheardM. (2014). Secularism and nonreligion. Secularism and Nonreligion, 3(6), 1–16. doi: 10.5334/snr.ar.
80.
ShettleworthS. J. (2010). Cognition, evolution, and behavior.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81.
ShinebourneP. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In FrostN. (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (pp. 44–65). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
82.
SilbermanI. (2005). Religion as a meaning system: Implications for the new millennium. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 641–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00425.x.
83.
SloneJ. D. (2004). Theological incorrectness: Why religious people believe what they shouldn't.United States: Oxford University Press.
84.
SmithJ. E. E. (1994). Quasi-religions: Humanism, Marxism, and Nationalism (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.
SolomonS.GreenbergJ., & PyszczynskiT. (2004). The cultural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L., & PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 13–34). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
87.
SpilkaB.ShaverP., & KirkpatrickL. A. (1985). A general attribution theory for the psychology of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24(1), 1. doi: 10.2307/1386272.
88.
StegerM. F. (2009). Meaning in life. In LopezS. J., & SnyderC. R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 679–687). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
89.
StreibH., & HoodR. W. (2013). Modelling the religious field: Religion, spirituality, mysticism, and related world views. Implicit Religion, 16(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1558/imre.v16i2.133.
90.
StreibH., & HoodR. W. (2016). Understanding “spirituality”—Conceptual considerations. In StreibH., & HoodR. W. (Eds.), Semantics and psychology of spirituality: A cross-cultural analysis (pp. 3–17). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_1.
91.
StreibH., & KellerB. (2004). The variety of Deconversion experiences: Contours of a concept in respect to empirical research. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 26(1), 181–200. doi: 10.1163/0084672053598030.
92.
TajfelH. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. doi: 10.1177/053901847401300204.
93.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P., & FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.
94.
TavesA. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building block approach to the study of religion and other special things.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
TavesA. (2013). Building blocks of sacralities: A new basis for comparison across cultures and religions. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 357–379). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
96.
TaylorC. (2007). A secular age.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97.
ThomasW. I., & ThomasD. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs.New York, NY: Knopf.
98.
TillichP. (1957). Dynamics of faith.New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
99.
TsirogianniS., & GaskellG. (2011). The role of plurality and context in social values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 441–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00470.x.
100.
VailK. E.RothschildZ. K.WeiseD. R.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT., & GreenbergJ. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 84–94. doi: 10.1177/1088868309351165.
101.
WhitehouseH., & LanmanJ. A. (2014). The ties that bind us. Current Anthropology, 55(6), 674–695. doi: 10.1086/678698
102.
WilliamsE.FrancisL. J., & RobbinsM. (2011). Implicit religion and the quest for meaning. Implicit Religion, 14(1), 45–65. doi: 10.1558/imre.v14i1.45.
103.
WilligC. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
104.
WoodheadL. (2011). Five concepts of religion. International Review of Sociology, 21(1), 121–143. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2011.544192.
105.
YingerJ. M. (1967). Pluralism, religion, and secularism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6(1), 17. doi: 10.2307/1384190.
106.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK. I., & ScottA. B. (1999). The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 889–919. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00077.
