Faith development theory has evolved as a prominent theoretical perspective during the past three decades to explain different ways of relating to religious beliefs and worldviews. Recent revisions of the theory have elaborated on these characteristic ways as religious styles namely the fundamentalist, mutual, individuative-systemic, and dialogical. The present study developed an Urdu version of its principal measure, i.e., Faith Development Interview, to analyze twelve cases of Muslims of various religious affiliations within Islam in Pakistan. Four case studies representative of each faith style are presented in detail. The cases are compared to analyze Islamic faith in terms of faith development theory and to understand fundamentalism in a Muslim context. The findings support faith development theory as a comprehensive paradigm to address the varieties of faith orientations in Islam. Implications for future research with larger samples in highly religious and collectivistic cultures are discussed.
AygünA. (2010) Comparison of religious socialization and faith development of Muslim adolescents in Turkey and Germany (Doctoral dissertation). Universität Bielefeld, Germany.
2.
BeckR. (2006). God as a secure base: Attachment to God and theological exploration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(2), 125.
3.
BlogowskaJ., & SaroglouV. (2011). Religious fundamentalism and limited pro-sociality as a function of the target. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(1), 44–60.
4.
FowlerJ. W. (1981). Stages of faith.New York: HarperCollins.
5.
FowlerJ. W., & DellM. L. (2005). Stages of faith from infancy through adolescence: Reflections on three decades of faith development theory. In RoehlkepartainE. C.KingP. E.WagenerL., & BensonP. L. (Eds.), The handbook of spiritual development in childhood and adolescence (pp. 34–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
FowlerJ. W.StreibH., & KellerB. (2004). Manual for faith development research.Center for Research in Faith and Moral Development, Candler School of Theology, Emory University.
7.
GrahamJ., & HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150.
8.
GranqvistP. (2010). Religion as attachment: The Godin Award lecture. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 5–24.
9.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
10.
KellerB., & StreibH. (2013) Faith development, religious styles and biographical narratives: Methodological perspectives. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26, 1–21.
11.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 961–973.
12.
KirkpatrickL. A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion.Guilford Press.
13.
KirkpatrickL. A., & ShaverP. R. (1992). An attachment-theoretical approach to romantic love and religious belief. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 266–275.
14.
MartyM. E., & ApplebyR. S. (Eds.) (1991). Fundamentalisms Observed, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
OkU. (2006). Faith development and perception of diversity among Muslims in Turkey: construction and initial test of a measure for religious diversity in Islam. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, VI(2006), sayı: 3.
16.
ÖzışıkS. (2015). Intergenerational changes in the religiosity of Turkish Islamic immigrants in contemporary Germany. A qualitative analysis using the Faith Development Interview (Doctoral dissertation). Evangelische Hochschule Darmstadt.
17.
ShawA.JosephS., & LinleyP. A. (2007). Religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth: A systematic review. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 8(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/1367467032000157981
18.
StreibH. (2001) Faith development theory revisited: The religious styles perspective. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 143–158.
19.
StreibH. (2003a). Religion as a question of style: Revising the structural differentiation of religion from the perspective of the analysis of the contemporary pluralistic-religious situation. International Journal for Practical Theology.7(1), 1–22.
20.
StreibH. (2003b). Faith development research at twenty years. In OsmerR. R., & SchweitzerF. (Eds.), Developing a public faith: New directions in practical theology. Essays in honor of James W. Fowler (pp. 15–42). St. Louis: Chalice Press.
21.
StreibH. (2005). Faith development research revisited: accounting for diversity in structure, content, and narrativity of faith. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 99–121.
22.
StreibH. (2013). Conceptualisation et mesure du devéloppement religieux en termes de schémas et de styles religieux—Résultats et nouvelles considerations [Conceptualization and measurement of religious development in terms of religious patterns and styles—Results and new considerations]. In BrandtP.-Y., & DayJ. M. (Eds.), Psychologie du développement religieux: questions classiques et perspectives contemporaines (pp. 39–76). Geneva: Labor et Fides.
23.
StreibH., & HoodR. W. (2011). “Spirituality” as privatized experience-oriented religion: Empirical and conceptual perspectives. Implicit Religion, 14(4), 433–453.
24.
StreibH., & HoodR. W. (Eds.). (2016). Semantics and psychology of “spirituality”. A cross-cultural analysis.Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
25.
StreibH.HoodR. W.KellerB.CsöffR.-M., & SilverC. (2009). Deconversion. Qualitative and quantitative results from cross cultural research in Germany and the United States of America.Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
