This study aimed to adapt the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire (SCSRFQ)-Brief Version to the Portuguese elderly, and to investigate the effect of relevant and easy to assess predictors on the strength of religious faith. Participants were 778 non-institutionalized Catholic elderly (65 or older), with a majority of women, young-olds (65-74), with four years or less of education, and practicing Catholics. The sample was randomly split in two (n = 389) to study the invariance and the structural validity of the SCSRFQ-Brief Version across both groups. Following this step, a multiple indicators and multiple causes model for age, gender, educational level, and religious participation influence on strength of religious faith was tested across groups. All predictors were statistically significant, with religious participation being the most influential. The study of religion in the elderly is enriched by resource to valid multiple-item instruments as the SCSRFQ-Brief Version.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
2.
AmadoN. (2008). Sucesso no envelhecimento e histórias de vida em idosos socio-culturalmente muito e pouco diferenciados [Successful aging and life stories in elders from a high and a low socio-cultural level] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Nova de Lisboa and Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa.
3.
AmadoN., & DinizA. M. (2008). Estrutura factorial e poder discriminativo do Questionário da Força da Fé Religiosa de Santa Clara (versão reduzida) numa amostra de adultos idosos [Factorial structure and discriminant power of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire (short version) in a sample of older adults] [CD-ROM]. In NoronhaA. P.MachadoC.AlmeidaL. S.GonçalvesM.MartinsS., & RamalhoV. (Eds.), Actas da XIII Conferência Internacional de Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos.Braga: Psiquilíbrios.
4.
AndersonJ. C., & GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.103.3.411
5.
AronowW. S.FlegJ. L.PepineC. J.ArtinianN. T.BakrisG.BrownA. S., … WesleyD. J. (2011). ACCF/AHA 2011 Expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. Journal of American College Cardiology, 57, 2037–2114. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.008
6.
BaltesP. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogenesis: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundations of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366
7.
BaltesP. B., & SmithJ. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging. From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49, 123–135. doi: 10.1159/000067946
8.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables.New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
CheungG. W., & RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
10.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
11.
CohenA. B., & KoenigH. G. (2003). Religion, religiosity and spirituality in the biopsychosocial model of health and ageing. Ageing International, 28, 215–241. doi: 10.1007/s12126-002-1005-1
12.
ColemanP. G., & O'HanlonA. (2004). Ageing and development.London: Arnold.
13.
CollettJ. L., & LizardoO. (2009). A power-control theory of gender and religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 213–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01441.x
14.
CummingsJ. P.CarsonC. S.ShresthaS.KunikM. E.ArmentoM. E.StanleyM. A., & AmspokerA. B. (2015). Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire: Psychometric analysis in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 19, 86–97. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.917606
15.
CurranP. J.WestS. G., & FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
DinizA. M., & AmadoN. (2014). Procedures for successful data collection through psychological tests in the elderly. Psychology/Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27, 491–497.
18.
EmeryE. E., & PargamentK. I. (2004). The many faces of religious coping in late life: Conceptualization, measurement, and links to well-being. Ageing International, 29, 3–27. doi: 10.1007/s12126-004-1007-2
19.
FerrissA. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 199–215. doi: 10.1023/A: 1020684404438
20.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E., & McHughP. A. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
21.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
22.
ForsterM. R. (2002). Predictive accuracy as an achievable goal of science. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S124–S134. doi: 10.1086/341840
23.
GreggoS. P., & LawrenceK. (2012). Clinical appraisal of spirituality: In search of rapid assessment instruments (RAIS) for Christian counselling. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 31, 253–266.
HillP. C., & PargamentK. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. American Psychologist, 58, 64–74. doi: 10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3
26.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
HungermanD. M. (2013). The effect of education on religion: Evidence from compulsory schooling laws. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 104, 52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.004
28.
IdlerE. L.MusickM. A.EllisonC. G.GeorgeL. K.KrauseN.OryM. G., … WilliamsD. R. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25, 327–365. doi: 10.1177/0164027503025004001
29.
JamesA., & WellsA. (2003). Religion and mental health: Towards a cognitive-behavioural framework. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 359–376. doi: 10.1348/135910703322370905
30.
JöreskogK. G., & GoldbergerA. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631–639. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10482485
31.
JöreskogK. G., & MoustakyI. (2001). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 347–387. doi: 10.1207/S15327906347-387
32.
JöreskogK. G., & SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
33.
JöreskogK. G., & SörbomD. (2002). LISREL 8.53 for Windows [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
34.
LunV. M., & BondM. H. (2013). Examining the relation of religion and spirituality to subjective well-being across national cultures. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 304–315. doi: 10.1037/a0033641
35.
MarcoenA.ColemanP. G., & O'HanlonA. (2007). Psychological ageing. In BondJ.PeaceS.Dittmann-KohliF., & WesterhofG. (Eds.), Ageing in society (3rd ed., pp. 38–67). London: Sage.
36.
McClearyR. M., & BarroR. (2006). Religion and political economy in an international panel. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 149–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00299.x
37.
MenéndezM. A. (2007). Religiosidade e valores em Portugal: Comparação com a Espanha e a Europa católica [Religiosity and values in Portugal: Comparison with Spain and Catholic Europe]. Análise Social, 27(184), 757–787.
MillerA., & StarkR. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved?American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399–1423. doi: 10.1086/342557
40.
MillerW. R., & ThoresenC. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health. An emerging research field. American Psychologist, 58, 24–35. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24
41.
MillsapR. E., & Yun-TeinJ. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4
42.
MorgadoJ.RochaC. S.MarutaC.GuerreiroM., & MartinsI. P. (2009). Novos valores normativos do Mini-Mental State Examination [New normative values of Mini-Mental State Examination]. Sinapse, 9, 10–16.
43.
NunnallyJ. C., & BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
PlanteT. G. (2010). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire: Assessing faith engagement in a brief and nondenominational manner. Religions, 1, 3–8. doi: 10.3390/rel1010003
46.
PlanteT. G., & BoccacciniM. T. (1997). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45, 375–387. doi: 10.1007/BF02230993
47.
PlanteT. G.VallaeysC. L.ShermanA. C., & WallstonK. A. (2002). The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 50, 359–367. doi: 10.1023/A: 1014413720710
48.
SatorraA., & BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von EyeA., & CloggC. C. (Eds.), Latent variable analysis (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
SchwadelP. (2014). Birth cohort changes in the association between college education and religious non-affiliation. Social Forces, 93, 719–746. doi: 10.1093/sf/sou080
50.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D., & CampbellD. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
51.
SheikhJ. I., & YesavageJ. A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 165–172. doi: 10.1300/J018v05n01_09
52.
SkarupskiK. A.FitchettG.EvansD. A., & Mendes de LeonC. F. (2010). Daily spiritual experiences in a biracial, community-based population of older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 14, 779–789. doi: 10.1080/13607861003713265
53.
SmithJ. (2002). The fourth age: A period of psychology of mortality?Max Planck Forum, 4, 75–88.
54.
SmithC.Lundquist-DentonM.FarisR., & RegnerusM. (2002). Mapping American adolescent religious participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 597–612. doi: 10.1111/1468-5906.00148
55.
StorchE. A.RobertiJ. W.BravataE., & StorchJ. B. (2004). Psychometric investigation of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire—Short-Form. Pastoral Psychology, 52, 479–483. doi: 10.1023/B: PASP.0000031526.64795.41
56.
SullinsD. P. (2006). Gender and religion: Deconstructing universality, constructing complexity. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 838–880. doi: 10.1086/507852
57.
TeixeiraA. (2011). Identidades religiosas em Portugal: Representações, valores e práticas—2011 [Religious identities in Portugal: Representations, values and practices—2011] (Research Report). Retrieved from http://www.agencia.ecclesia.pt/dlds/bo/Inqurito2011_Resumo.pdf
58.
ThompsonE. H., & RemmesK. R. (2002). Does masculinity thwart being religious? An examination of older men's religiousness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 521–532. doi: 10.1111/1468-5906.00135
59.
TumasV.RodriguesG. G. R.FariasT. L. A., & CrippaJ. A. S. (2008). The accuracy of diagnosis of major depression in patients with Parkinson's disease: A comparative study among the UPDRS, the Geriatric Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory. Arquivos de Neuropsiquiatria, 66, 152–156. doi: 10.1590/S0004-282X2008000200002
60.
WeberM. (2005). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism.London, England: Routledge. (Original work published in 1930)
