This study developed a Buddhist Generosity Scale to assess Buddhist generosity, acts of compassion to give something of value to humans and animals, among Thai Buddhists. Conceptually the Scale consists of two factors: scope—giving to humans and animals, and criticality—the gifts’ importance to the recipients. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the two-factor structure. Convergent validity tests showed its relationships with optimism, hope, and altruism but none with forgiveness; discriminant validity tests found positive relationship with psychological entitlement but none with trait anger and greed. Results of the predictive validity test showed that Buddhist generosity mediated the relationship between loving kindness and happiness. The scale is valid for use to assess Buddhist generosity in countries where Theravada Buddhism is practiced. The relationships between good thought (loving kindness) and good deed (Buddhist generosity) and good result (happiness) support the Buddhist law of human behaviors (kamma).
AriyabuddhiphongsV., & JaiwongD. (2010). Observance of Buddhist Five Precepts, wealth, and happiness among Buddhists in Bangkok, Thailand. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 327–344. doi: 10.1163/157361210X533274
6.
AriyabuddhiphongsV., & PratchawittayagornA. (2014). Peace of mind and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating effect of loving kindness. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 36(2), 233–252. doi: 10.1163/15736121-12341284
7.
BarclayP. (2010). Altruism as a courtship display: Some effects of third-party generosity on audience perceptions. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 123–135. doi: 10.1348/000712609X435733
8.
BartelsM. (2015). Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: A review and meta-analysis of heritability studies. Behavior Genetics, 45(2), 137–156. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y
9.
BlissA., & StuberM. L. (1999). Giving life for the second time: A preliminary study of parental partial liver donation for pediatric transplantation. Families, Systems, & Health, 17(2), 217–228. doi: 10.1037/h0089883
10.
BoellinghausI.JonesF. W., & HuttonJ. (2014). The role of mindfulness and loving-kindness meditation in cultivating self-compassion and other-focused concern in health care professionals. Mindfulness, 5(2), 129–138. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0158-6
11.
BrooksA. (2007). Does giving make us prosperous?Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(3), 403–411. doi: 10.1007/bf02885730
12.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J., & BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
DewJ., & WilcoxW. B. (2013). Generosity and the maintenance of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(5), 1218–1228. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12066
15.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E., & SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
16.
DunnE. W.AkninL. B., & NortonM. I. (2014). Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 41–47. doi: 10.1177/0963721413512503
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G., & BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146
18.
FergusonE.FarrellK., & LawrenceC. (2008). Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology, 27(3), 327–336. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.327
19.
FerrissA. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 199–215. doi: 10.1023/A: 1020684404438
20.
FredricksonB. L.CohnM. A.CoffeyK. A.PekJ., & FinkelS. M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1045–1062. doi: 10.1037/a0013262
21.
GraesserC. C., & AndersonN. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra of the equation: Gift size = generosity = income. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(4), 692–699. doi: 10.1037/h0037155
22.
HansenT. (2012). Parenthood and happiness: A review of folk theories versus empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 29–64. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9865-y
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HogeE. A.ChenM. M.OrrE.MetcalfC. A.FischerL. E.PollackM. H., … SimonN. M. (2013). Loving-Kindness Meditation practice associated with longer telomeres in women. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 32, 159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.04.005
25.
HooperD.CoughlanJ., & MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. Available online at www.ejbrm.com
26.
HutchersonC. A.SeppalaE. M., & GrossJ. J. (2008). Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness. Emotion, 8(5), 720–724. doi: 10.1037/a0013237
27.
IrelandM. (2012). Meditation and psychological health and functioning: A descriptive and critical review. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 9(1), 4–19.
28.
KrausS., & SearsS. (2009). Measuring the immeasurables: Development and initial validation of the Self-Other Four Immeasurables (SOFI) Scale based on Buddhist teachings on loving kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Social Indicators Research, 92(1), 169–181. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9300-1
29.
KrauseN., & ShawB. A. (2000). Giving social support to others, socioeconomic status, and changes in self-esteem in late life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciencs, 55B(6), S323–S333.
30.
KrejcieR. V., & MorganD. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.
LiangJ.KrauseN. M., & BennettJ. M. (2001). Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving?Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 511–523. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.511
33.
LuekeA.FitzgeraldC. J.WickwireJ., & WeltonC. (2013). Differences in generosity between smokers and nonsmokers in an upcoming smoking ban. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 1073–1078. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12071
34.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.BrownS. W., & HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
35.
MoghaddamM. (2008). Happiness, faith, friends, and fortune—Empirical evidence from the 1998 US survey data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(4), 577–587. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9090-9
PholphirulP. (2014). Happiness from giving: Quantitative investigation of Thai Buddhists. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(4), 703–720. doi: 10.1007/s11482-014-9349-8
40.
PreacherK. J. (2001, April). Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org
41.
RaffelS. (2001). On generosity. History of the Human Sciences, 14(4), 111–128. doi: 10.1177/095269510101400405
42.
RobinsonK.KennedyN., & HarmonD. (2012). Happiness: A review of evidence relevant to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(2), 150–164. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2011.634780
43.
RushtonJ. P.ChrisjohnR. D., & FekkenG. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 293–302.
44.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
45.
ScheierM. F.CarverC. S., & BridgesM. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078. doi: 10.1037/0022.3514.67.6.1063
46.
Scorsolini-CominF., & dos SantosM. A. (2010). The scientific study of happiness and health promotion: An integrative literature review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 18(3), 472–479. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692010000300025
47.
SeuntjensT. G.ZeelenbergM.van de VenN., & BreugelmansS. M. (2015). Dispositional greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 917–933. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000031
48.
ShoninE.GordonW.CompareA.ZangenehM., & GriffithsM. D. (2015). Buddhist-derived loving-kindness and compassion meditation for the treatment of psychopathology: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1161–1180. doi: 10.1007/s12671-014-0368-1
49.
SiegelJ. M. (1986). The multidimensional anger inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 191–200. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.191
SnoepL. (2008). Religiousness and happiness in three nations: A research note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 207–211. doi: 10.1007/s10902-007-9045-6
52.
SnyderC. R.SympsonS. C.YbascoF. C.BordersT. F.BabyakM. A., & HigginsR. L. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321
53.
StöberJ. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222–232. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222
54.
WilcoxW. B., & DewJ. (2016). The social and cultural predictors of generosity in marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 37(1), 97–118. doi: 10.1177/0192513X13513581
55.
WrightK. (2001). Generosity vs. altruism: Philanthropy and charity in the United States and United Kingdom. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(4), 399–416. doi: 10.1023/a: 1013974700175
56.
ZarbatanyL.HartmannD. P., & GelfandD. M. (1985). Why does children's generosity increase with age: Susceptibility to experimenter influence or altruism?Child Development, 56(3), 746–756. doi: 10.2307/1129763
