A cross-national multilevel analysis was conducted to determine the effects of religion on the extent to which violence is seen as justified against others. Contrary to popular notions that religion causes violence, frequency of prayer, importance of religion, and importance of God were negatively related to justification of violence. Only frequency of service attendance and justification of violence had a positive relationship. This relationship was attenuated when a supernatural meaning system was applied to one's religious beliefs (i.e., religion is primarily for the purpose of making sense of life after death). This meaning system also moderated the relationship between importance of religion and justification of violence. Finally, national-level importance of God moderated the negative relationship between individual level importance of God and justification of violence, strengthening this relationship. Results undermine the constructivist argument for religion as a cause of violence.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. doi: 10.1037/h0021212
2.
ArmstrongK. (2014, September 25). The myth of religious violence. The Guardian.
3.
Beit-HallahmiB. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity.New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BendaB. B., & ToombsN. J. (2000). Religiosity and violence: Are they related after considering the strongest predictors?Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(6), 483–496. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(00)00064-7
BottomsB. L.ShaverP. R.GoodmanG. S., & QinJ. (1995). In the name of God: A profile of religion-related child abuse. Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 85–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01325
7.
BushmanB. J.RidgeR. D.DasE.KeyC. W., & BusathG. L. (2007). When God sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychological Science, 18(3), 204–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01873
8.
CavanaughW. T. (2007). Does religion cause violence. Harvard Divinity Bulletin, 35(2), 1–18.
9.
DawkinsR. (2003). A devil's chaplain: Reflections on hope, lies, science, and love.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
FischerP.HaslamS. A., & SmithL. (2010). “If you wrong us, shall we not revenge?” Social identity salience moderates support for retaliation in response to collective threat. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(2), 143–150. doi: 10.1037/a0017970
11.
GingesJ.HansenI., & NorenzayanA. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20(2), 224–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02270
12.
GingesJ.HansenI., & NorenzayanA. (2010). Religious belief, coalitional commitment, and support for suicide attacks. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 346–349.
13.
GreerT.BermanM.VaranV.BobryckiL., & WatsonS. (2005). We are a religious people; we are a vengeful people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(1), 45–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00264
14.
GrewalR.CoteJ. A., & BaumgartnerH. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
15.
HardyS. A.WalkerL. J.RackhamD. D., & OlsenJ. A. (2012). Religiosity and adolescent empathy and aggression: The mediating role of moral identity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 237–248. doi: 10.1037/a0027566
16.
HarrisS. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason.New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
17.
HasencleverA., & RittbergerV. (2000). Does religion make a difference? Theoretical approaches to the impact of faith on political conflict. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(3), 641–674. doi: 10.1057/9781403982360_5
18.
HelminiakD. A. (1997). Killing for God's sake: The spiritual crisis in religion and society. Pastoral Psychology, 45(5), 365–374. doi: 10.1007/BF02230992
19.
HoxJ. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications.New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
JohnsonD. (2011). Why God is the best punisher. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 77–84. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2011.558714
21.
JohnsonD., & KrügerO. (2004). The good of wrath: Supernatural punishment and the evolution of cooperation. Political Theology, 5(2), 159–176. doi: 10.1558/poth.2004.5.2.159
22.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C., & LaBouffJ. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 119–126. doi: 10.1177/1948550609357246
23.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C., & LaBouffJ. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154. doi: 10.1037/a0025107
24.
JuergensmeyerM., & KittsM. (2011). Princeton readings in religion and violence.Princteon, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
KingR. (2007). The association of ‘religion'with violence. In HinnellsJ. R., & KingR. (Eds.), Religion and violence in South Asia: Theory and practice (pp. 214–242). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
LeachM. M.BermanM. E., & EubanksL. (2008). Religious activities, religious orientation, and aggressive behavior. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(2), 311–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00409.x
27.
MulukH.SumaktoyoN. G., & RuthD. M. (2013). Jihad as justification: National survey evidence of belief in violent jihad as a mediating factor for sacred violence among Muslims in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 101–111. doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12002
28.
MunsonH. (2005). Religion and violence. Religion, 35(4), 223–246. doi: 10.1016/j.religion.2005.10.006
29.
MyersD. G. (2012). Reflections on religious belief and prosociality: Comment on Galen (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 913–917. doi: 10.1037/a0029009
30.
PaulhusD. L., & VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C., & KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York: Guilford Press.
31.
PehrsonS.VignolesV. L., & BrownR. (2009). National identification and anti-immigrant prejudice: Individual and contextual effects of national definitions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(1), 24–38. doi: 10.1177/019027250907200104
32.
PetterssonT. (1991). Religion and criminality: Structural relationships between church involvement and crime rates in contemporary Sweden. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(3), 279–291. doi: 10.2307/1386973
33.
SaroglouV. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. doi: 10.1177/0022022111412267
34.
SaroglouV.CorneilleO., & Van CappellenP. (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(3), 143–154. doi: 10.1080/10508610902880063
35.
SchumannK.McGregorI.NashK. A., & RossM. (2014). Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 432. doi: 10.1037/a0036739
36.
SettlesI. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487–500. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261885
37.
ShariffA. F., & RhemtullaM. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PloS One, 7(6), e39048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039048
38.
SilbermanI. (2005a). Religion as a meaning system: Implications for the new millennium. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 641–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00425
39.
SilbermanI. (2005b). Religious violence, terrorism, and peace: A meaning-system analysisHandbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (pp. 529–549). Guilford Press: New York, NY.
40.
StirrattM. J.MeyerI. H.OuelletteS. C., & GaraM. A. (2008). Measuring identity multiplicity and intersectionality: Hierarchical classes analysis (HICLAS) of sexual, racial, and gender identities. Self and Identity, 7(1), 89–111. doi: 10.1080/15298860701252203
41.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G., & WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
42.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In JostJ. T., & SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings in social psychology (pp. 276–293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
43.
TaylorS. P. (1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35(2), 297–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01430
44.
ThomsonJ. A. (2009). Who are we? Where did we come from? How religious identity divides and damns us all. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69(1), 22–42.
45.
WellmanJ. K.Jr., & TokunoK. (2004). Is religious violence inevitable?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43(3), 291–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00234
46.
WhitleyB., & KiteM. (2006). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination.Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
47.
World Values Survey Association. (2010-2014). World Values Survey Wave 6 2010-2014 Official Aggregate v.20141107. Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid SPAIN. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
48.
WorthingtonE. L. (1988). Understanding the values of religious clients: A model and its application to counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35(2), 166–174. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.35.2.166
49.
WorthingtonE. L.WadeN. G.HightT. L.RipleyJ. S.McCulloughM. E.BerryJ. W., … O'ConnorL. (2003). The religious commitment inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 84–96. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.84
50.
WrightJ. D. (2014). Religious identity and violence: understanding salience and centrality of religious identity as potential moderators of aggression in response to threat. (M.A. General Psychology Thesis). Hunter College of the City University of New York.
51.
WrightJ. D. (2015). A social identity and social power perspective on terrorism. Journal of Terrorism Research, 6(3), 76–83. doi: 10.15664/jtr.1184
52.
WrightJ. D. (2016). Why is contemporary religious terrorism predominantly linked to Islam: Four possible psychosocial factors. Perspectives on Terrorism, 10(1), 19–31.
53.
YsseldykR.MathesonK., & AnismanH. (2011). Coping with identity threat: The role of religious orientation and implications for emotions and action intentions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(2), 132–148. doi: 10.1037/a0021599
