In the current study, unacquainted groups of both religious Christians and nonreligious atheists/agnostics rated themselves and each other on a number of attributes, including religiosity and morality. A Social Relations analysis revealed small, but statistically significant levels of consensus for impressions of religiosity. Subsequent correlations indicated that groups relied on the target's gender and race to reach consensus. Analyses of participants’ idiosyncratic ratings revealed similarity between religious and non-religious perceivers in terms of their association of high morality with religiousness. Religious identification did moderate the relationship between religiosity and emotional stability, as well as between religiosity and extraversion. These results indicate that group stereotypes for religiosity are largely shared among both adherents and non-adherents.
Abdel-KhalekA. M. (2013). Personality dimensions and religiosity among Kuwaiti Muslim college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 149–152. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.004
2.
AiA. L.BjorckJ. P.AppelH. B., & HuangB. (2013). Asian American spirituality and religion: Inherent diversity, uniqueness, and long-lasting psychological influences. In PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J., & JonesJ. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research. (pp. 581–598). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
3.
AlbrightL.KennyD. A., & MalloyT. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.387
4.
AmbadyN.HallahanM., & RosenthalR. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518–529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.518
5.
BaileyR. C., & DoriotP. (1985). Perceptions of professionals who express religious beliefs. Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 167–170.
6.
BobkowskiP. S., & KalyanaramanS. (2010). Effects of online Christian self-disclosure on impression formation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 456–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01522.x
7.
ChoudharyS. (1989). A study of the relationship between neuroticism and religiosity. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 5, 47–50.
8.
CohenA. B., & RozinP. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 697–710. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.697
9.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T., & GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
10.
DawkinsR. (2006). The God delusion.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
EdgellP.GerteisJ., & HartmannD. (2006). Atheists as ‘other': Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211–234.
12.
ErikssonK., & FunckeA. (2014). Humble self-enhancement: Religiosity and the better-than-average effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 76–83. doi: 10.1177/1948550613484179
13.
FelteyK. M., & PolomaM. M. (1991). From sex differences to gender role beliefs: Exploring effects on six dimensions of religiosity. Sex Roles, 25, 181–193. doi: 10.1007/bf00289853
14.
FrancisL. J. (1997). The psychology of gender differences in religion: A review of empirical research. Religion, 27, 81–96. doi: 10.1006/reli.1996.0066
15.
GalenL. W.SmithC. M.KnappN., & WyngardenN. (2011). Perceptions of religious and nonreligious targets: Exploring the effects of perceivers’ religious fundamentalism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2123–2143. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00810.x
16.
GalenL. W.WilliamsT. J., & Ver WeyA. L. (2014). Personality ratings are influenced by religious stereotype and ingroup bias. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24, 282–297. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2013.837658
17.
GervaisW. M.ShariffA. F., & NorenzayanA. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206. doi: 10.1037/a0025882
18.
GilbertD. T.PelhamB. W., & KrullD. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733
19.
GrahamJ., & HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. doi: 10.1177/1088868309353415
20.
HallD. L.CohenA. B.MeyerK. K.VarleyA. H., & BrewerG. A. (2015). Costly signaling increases trust, even across religious affiliations. Psychological Science, 26, 1368–1376. doi: 10.1177/0956797615576473
21.
HarperM. (2007). The stereotyping of nonreligious people by religious students: Contents and subtypes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 539–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00376.x
22.
HarrisM. J., & GarrisC. P. (2008). You never get a second chance to make a first impression: Behavioral consequences of first impressions. In AmbadyN., & SkowronskiJ. J. (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 147–168). New York, NY, US: Guilford Publications.
23.
JussimL. (1991). Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model. Psychological Review, 98, 54–73. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.54
24.
JussimL. (2012). Social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy.New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
25.
KennyD. A. (1988). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 247–261. doi: 10.1177/026540758800500207
26.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
KennyD. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 265–280. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3
29.
KennyD. A.AlbrightL.MalloyT. E., & KashyD. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the big five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245–258. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.245
30.
KennyD. A.HornerC.KashyD. A., & ChuL.-c. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88–97. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.88
31.
KooleS. L.McCulloughM. E.KuhlJ., & RoelofsmaP. H. M. P. (2010). Why religion's burdens are light: From religiosity to implicit self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 95–107. doi: 10.1177/1088868309351109
32.
KwanV. S. Y.JohnO. P.KennyD. A.BondM. H., & RobinsR. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94–110. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.94
33.
LevesqueM. J., & KennyD. A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178–1187. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1178
34.
McCulloughM. E.SwartwoutP.ShaverJ. H.CarterE. C., & SosisR. (2015). Christian religious badges instill trust in Christian and non-Christian perceivers. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, No Pagination Specified. doi: 10.1037/rel0000045
35.
McCulloughM. E., & WilloughbyB. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93. doi: 10.1037/a0014213
36.
MeagherB. R., & KennyD. A. (2013). Judge, that ye shall be judged: Interpersonal judgments of religious characteristics within faith communities. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 116–128. doi: 10.1037/a0030438
37.
NaumannL. P.VazireS.RentfrowP. J., & GoslingS. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671. doi: 10.1177/0146167209346309
38.
NewportF. (2012). God is alive and well: The future of religion in America.New York: Gallup Press.
39.
PichonI.BoccatoG., & SaroglouV. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.416
40.
Randolph-SengB., & NielsenM. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303–315. doi: 10.1080/10508610701572812
41.
RowattW. C.OttenbreitA.NesselroadeK. P.Jr., & CunninghamP. A. (2002). On being holier-than-thou or humbler-than-thee: A social-psychological perspective on religiousness and humility. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 227–237.
42.
RuleN. O.GarrettJ. V., & AmbadyN. (2010). On the perception of religious group membership from faces. PLoS ONE, 5, 1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014241
43.
SaroglouV. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00233-6
44.
SaroglouV. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 108–125. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352322
45.
SaroglouV.YzerbytV., & KaschtenC. (2011). Meta-stereotypes of groups with opposite religious views: Believers and non-believers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 484–498. doi: 10.1002/casp.1123
46.
SchönbrodtF. D.BackM. D., & SchmukleS. C. (2012). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 455–470.
47.
SchutteJ. W., & HoschH. M. (1996). Optimism, religiosity, and neuroticism: A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 239–244. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00147-6
48.
SedikidesC., & GebauerJ. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36. doi: 10.1177/1088868309351002
49.
ShariffA. F., & NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
50.
ShariffA. F.WillardA. K.AndersenT., & NorenzayanA. (2015). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
51.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G., & WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monteray, CA: Brooks/Cole.
52.
ToburenT., & MeierB. P. (2010). Priming God-related concepts increases anxiety and task persistence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 127–143. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.2.127
53.
VorauerJ. D., & SakamotoY. (2008). Who cares what the outgroup thinks? Testing an information search model of the importance individuals accord to an outgroup member's view of them during intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1467–1480. doi: 10.1037/a0012631
54.
WinterL.UlemanJ. S., & CunniffC. (1985). How automatic are social judgments?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 904–917. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.904
55.
YsseldykR.MathesonK., & AnismanH. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71. doi: 10.1177/1088868309349693
56.
ZuckermanM.SilbermanJ., & HallJ. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity: A meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 325–354. doi: 10.1177/1088868313497266
