This study addressed the lack of implicit measures of religiosity in German research by developing a German Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) for measuring the associative religious self-concept. The SC-IAT was applied to a sample consisting of 389 German students with different subjects of study and internally consistent (r = .72). To estimate the psychometric criteria of construct validity, SC-IAT scores were correlated to the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS), whose construct psychological approach can be theoretically linked to the concept of associative representations in the research on IATs. Corresponding to the average relationship between implicit and explicit measures in literature, the correlation was moderately (r = .33). Group comparisons relating to religious affiliation and subject of study provided initial evidence for criterion validity. There were complications with the attribute category “non-religious,” especially by participants without a religious affiliation, however, the SC-IAT could also provide a method to investigate this issue.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
2.
Bertelsmann-Stiftung (Ed.) (2009). What the world believes: Analysis and commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008.Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.
3.
CohenA. B.ShariffA. F., & HillP. C. (2008). The accessibility of religious beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1408–1417.
4.
DijksterhuisA.PrestonJ.WegnerD. M., & AartsH. (2008). Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 2–9.
5.
FazioR. H., & OlsonM. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
6.
GärtnerC.PollackD., & Wohlrab-SahrM. (2003). Atheismus und religiöse Indifferenz [Atheism and religious indifference]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
7.
GibsonN. J. S. (2006). The experimental investigation of religious cognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, UK.
8.
GreenwaldA. G., & FarnhamS. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–1038.
9.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.RudmanL. A.FarnhamS. D.NosekB. A., & MellottD. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25.
10.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E., & SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.
11.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A., & BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.
12.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L., & BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.
13.
GschwendnerT.HofmannW., & SchmittM. (2006). Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale [Moderators of the consistency of implicitly and explicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits]. Psychologische Rundschau, 57(1), 13–33.
14.
HillP. C. (1994). Toward an attitude process model of religious experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33(4), 303–314.
15.
HillP. C., & PargamentK. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. American Psychologist, 58(1), 64–74.
16.
HofmannW.GawronskiB.GschwendnerT.LeH., & SchmittM. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385.
17.
HoodR. W., & BelzenJ. A. (2005). Research methods in the psychology of religion. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 62–80). New York: Guilford Press.
18.
HuberS. (2003). Zentralität und Inhalt. Ein neues multidimensionales Messmodell der Religiosität [Centrality and content. A new multidimensional measurement of religiosity]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
19.
HuberS. (2004). Zentralität und multidimensionale Struktur der Religiosität. Eine Synthese der theoretischen Ansätze von Allport und Glock zur Messung der Religiosität [Centrality and the multidimensional structure of religiosity. A synthesis of the theoretical approaches for the measurment of religion by Allport and Glock]. In ZwingmannC., & MoosbruggerH. (Eds.), Religiosität. Messverfahren und Studien zu Gesundheit und Lebensbewältigung (pp. 79–105). Münster: Waxmann.
20.
HuberS. (2008). Kerndimensionen, Zentralität und Inhalt. Ein interdisziplinäres Modell der Religiosität [Central dimensions, centrality and content. An interdisciplinary model of religiosity]. Journal für Psychologie, 16(3). Retrieved from http://www.journal-fuer-psychologie.de/index.php/jfp/article/view/202/105
21.
HuberS. (2009). Religion Monitor 2008: Structuring principles, operational constructs, interpretive strategies. In Bertelsmann-Stiftung (Ed.), What the world believes: Analysis and commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008 (pp. 17–51). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.
Inquisit Web 3.0.6.0. (2011). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
24.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C., & LaBouffJ. P. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126.
25.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C., & LaBouffJ. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168.
26.
JongJ. (2013). Implicit measures in the experimental psychology of religion. In DawesG. W., & MaclaurinJ. (Eds.), A New Science of Religion (pp. 65–78). London: Routledge.
27.
KarpinskiA. (2004). Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The role of the other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(1), 22–34.
28.
KarpinskiA., & SteinmanR. B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 16–32.
29.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. Vol. 1: A theory of personality.New York: Norton.
30.
LaBouffJ. P.JohnsonM. K.TsangJ.RowattW. C., & ThedfordM. (2010). Development and initial validation of an implicit measure of religiousness-spirituality. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(3), 439–455.
31.
LaBouffJ. P. (2011). The ecological validity of priming religiousness: Context and culture (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baylor University, USA.
32.
LaneK. A.MahzarinR. B.NosekB. A., & GreenwaldA. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test. IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In WittenbrinkB., & SchwarzN. (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59–102). New York: Guilford.
33.
LuhmannN. (2000). Die Religion der Gesellschaft [The religion of society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
34.
NosekB. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 565–584.
35.
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G., & BanajiM. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test. II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180.
36.
PowersC.NamR. K.RowattW. C., & HillP. C. (2007). Associations between humility, spiritual transcendence, and forgiveness. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 18, 75–94.
37.
RowattW. C., & FranklinL. M. (2004). Research: Christian orthodoxy, religious fundamentalism, and right-wing authoritarianism as predictors of implicit racial prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(2), 125–138.
38.
RowattW. C.FranklinL. M., & CottonM. (2005). Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(1), 29–43.
39.
RowattW. C.PowersC.TarghettaV.ComerJ.KennedyS., & LaBouffJ. P. (2006). Development and initial validation of an implicit measure of humility relative to arrogance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(4), 198–211.
40.
RowattW. C.TsangJ. A.KellyJ.LaMartinaB.McCullersM., & McKinleyA. (2006). Associations between religious personality dimensions and implicit homosexual prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(3), 397–406.
41.
ShariffA. F., & NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.
42.
SmithE. R., & DeCosterJ. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131.
43.
StarkR., & GlockC. Y. (1968). American piety: The nature of religious commitment.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
TsangJ.-A., & RowattW. C. (2007). The relationship between religious orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and implicit sexual prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(2), 99–120.
45.
UtschM., & KleinC. (2011). Religion, Religiosität, Spiritualität. Bestimmungsversuche für komplexe Begriffe [Religion, religiosity, spirituality. Attempts at definitions for complex terms]. In KleinC.BerthH., & BlackF. (Eds.), Gesundheit—Religion—Spiritualität. Konzepte, Befunde, Erklärungsansätze (pp. 25–45). Weinheim: Juventa.
46.
Van BavelJ. J., & CunninghamW. A. (2010). A social neuroscience approach to self and social categorisation: A new look at an old issue. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 237–284.
47.
VentisW. L.BallC. T., & ViggianoC. (2010). A Christian humanist implicit association test. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2(3), 181–189.
48.
WengerJ. L. (2003). Implicit components of religious beliefs. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 22(3), 223–229.
49.
WengerJ. L. (2004). Research: The automatic activation of religious concepts: Implications for religious orientations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(2), 109–123.
50.
WengerJ. L. (2007). The implicit nature of intrinsic religious pursuit. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(1), 47–60.
51.
WengerJ. L., & DanielsA. L. (2006). Who distinguishes between sinners and sins at the implicit level of awareness?The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 657–669.
52.
WengerJ. L., & YarbroughT. D. (2005). Religious individuals: Evaluating their intrinsic and extrinsic motivations at the implicit level of awareness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(1), 5–16.
53.
ZwingmannC.KleinC., & BüssingA. (2011). Measuring religiosity/spirituality: Theoretical differentiations and categorization of instruments. Religions, 2(3), 345–357. Retrieved from http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/2/3/345/pdf
54.
ZwingmannC.KleinC., & HöflingV. (2011). Messung von Religiosität/Spiritualität im Rahmen der Gesundheitsforschung. Ein überblick über deutschsprachige Fragebogenskalen [The measurement of religiosity/spirituality in the context of health research. A view of German questionnaires]. In KleinC.BerthH., & BlackF. (Eds.), Gesundheit—Religion—Spiritualität. Konzepte, Befunde, Erklärungsansätze (pp. 65–91). Weinheim: Juventa.
