Research indicates that greater involvement in religion may be associated with better physical health. The purpose of this study is to see if the satisfaction of spiritual needs is associated with health. This model that contains the following core hypotheses: (1) Individuals who attend church more often are more likely to receive spiritual support from fellow church members than people who attend worship services less frequently (spiritual support is informal encouragement from fellow church members to adopt and implement religious issues in daily life); (2) receiving more spiritual support is associated with stronger feelings of belonging in a congregation; (3) individuals who feel they belong in their congregations are more likely to feel their spiritual needs have been met; and (4) people who feel their spiritual needs have been met are more likely to rate their health in a favorable manner. The data provide support for each of these relationships.
BaldwinJ. M. (1902). Fragments in philosophy and science of being: Collected essays and addresses.New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
2.
BergerP. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory.New York: Doubleday.
3.
CarrierH. (1965). The sociology of religious belonging.New York: Herder and Herder.
4.
ChangB.SteinN. R.TrevinoK.StewartM.HendricksA., & SkarfL. M. (2012). Spiritual needs and spiritual care for veterans at the end of life and their families. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 29, 610–617.
5.
CottinghamJ. (2005). The spiritual dimension: Religion, philosophy, and human value.New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DeShonR. P. (1998). A cautionary note on measurement error correlations in structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 3, 412–423.
7.
du ToitM., & du ToitS. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User's guide.Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
8.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis.New York: Guilford Press.
9.
Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research.Kalamazoo, MI: John E. Fetzer Institute.
10.
GrahamJ., & HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals to moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150.
11.
HaywardR. D., & ElliottM. (2009). Fitting in with the flock: Social attractiveness as a mechanism for well-being in religious groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 592–607.
12.
KellowayE. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
KoenigH. G.KingD. E., & CarsonV. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health, 2nd edition.New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Koltko-RiveraM. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10, 302–317.
15.
KrauseN. (2008). Aging in the church: How social relationships affect health.West Cohshohocken, PA: John Templeton Press.
16.
KrauseN.ChattersL. M.MeltzerT., & MorganD. L. (2000). Negative interaction in the church: Insights from focus groups with older adults. Review of Religious Research, 41, 510–533.
17.
LewinK. (1926/1999). A Kurt Lewin reader: The complete social scientist, edited by M. Gold.Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality.New York: Harper.
19.
MastersK. S., & HookerS. A. (2013). Religiousness/spirituality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: Cultural Integration for health research and intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 206–216.
20.
McCulloughM. E.PargamentK. I., & ThoresenC. E. (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and Practice.New York: Guilford.
21.
McFaddenS. H.KneppleA. M., & ArmstrongJ. A. (2003). Length and locus of friendship influence, church members’ sense of social support, and comfort with sharing emotions. Journal of Religious Gerontology, 15, 39–55.
22.
McPhersonJ. M. (1982). Hypernetwork sampling: Duality and differentiation among voluntary organizations. Social Networks, 3, 225–249.
23.
PargamentK. I. (1997). The psychology of religious coping: Theory, research, and practice.New York: Guilford.
24.
PittmanT. S., & ZeiglerK. R. (2007). Basic human needs. In KruglanskiA. W., & HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd edition (pp. 473–515). New York: Guilford.
25.
RobertsR. C. (2007). Spiritual emotions: A psychology of Christian virtues.Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
26.
RoyceJ. (1913/2001). The problem of Christianity.Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.
27.
SchiemanS.PudrovskaT., & MilkieM. A. (2005). The sense of divine control and the self-concept. Review of Religious Research, 27, 165–196.
28.
SmallA. (1900). The scope of sociology IV: The assumptions of sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 42–66.
29.
WillsE. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being: Evidences for a new domain in the Personal Well-Being Index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 49–69.
30.
YsseldykR.MathesonK., & AnismanH. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71.
31.
ZinnbauerB. J., & PargamentK. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 2–442). New York: Guilford.
