Research indicates that positive relationships with fellow church members are associated with better mental health. However, far less research has focused on the relationship between negative interaction with fellow church members and mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between church-based negative interaction and depressive symptoms with data from a nationwide sample of older Mexican Americans. Statistically significant findings were found for the following core relationships in our study model: (1) older Mexican Americans who encounter negative interaction with fellow church members experience more doubts about their faith; (2) older Mexican Americans who experience more doubts about their faith are more likely to expect transgressors to perform acts of contrition (i.e., make amends); and (3) older Mexican Americans who require transgressors to perform acts of contrition are more likely to experience symptoms of depression. Subsequent empirical analyses provide support for each of these relationships.
AlwinD.F. (1988). Structural equation models for research on human development and aging. In: SchaieK.W.CampbellR.T.MeredithW. & RawlingsS.C. (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Aging Research (pp. 71–170). New York: Springer.
2.
BergerP.L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory.New York: Doubleday.
3.
BlazerD.G. (2002). Depression in Late Life, 3rd edn. New York: Springer.
4.
CarpenterS. (2000). Allocentrism and ideocentrism as predictors of in-group perceptions: An individual differences extension of cultural patterns. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 262–268.
5.
CarstensenL.L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socio-emotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338.
6.
CooleyC.H. (1927). Life and the Student.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
7.
DeShonR.P. (1998). A cautionary note on measurement error correlations in structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 3, 412–423.
8.
Du ToitM. & Du ToitS. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User's Guide.Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
9.
EllisonC.G. & LeeJ. (2010). Spiritual struggles and psychological distress: Is there a dark side to religion?Social Indicators, 98, 501–517.
10.
EllisonC.G.ZhangW.KrauseN. & MarcumJ.P. (2009). Does negative interaction in the church increase depression? Longitudinal findings from the Presbyterian Panel Survey. Sociology of Religion, 70, 409–431.
11.
EndersC.K. (2010). Applied Missing Data Analysis.New York: Guilford.
12.
EspinosaG.ElizondoV. & MirandaJ. (2003). Hispanic Churches in American Public Life: Summary of Findings.South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame.
13.
FernandezE.C. (2007). Mexican American Catholics.New York: Paulist Press.
14.
FitzgibbonsR. (1998). Anger and the healing power of forgiveness: A psychiatrist's view. In: EnrightR.D. & NorthJ. (Eds.), Exploring Forgiveness (pp. 63–74). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
FrankelE. (1998). Repentance, psychotherapy, and healing through a Jewish lens. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 814–833.
16.
GoizuetaR.S. (2002). The symbolic world of Mexican American religion. In: MatovinaT. & Riebe-EstrellaG. (Eds.), Horizons of the Sacred: Mexican Traditions in U.S. Catholicism (pp. 119–138). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
HookJ.N.WorthingtonE.L. & UtseyS.O. (2009). Collectivism, forgiveness, and social harmony. Counseling Psychologist, 37, 821–847.
18.
KellowayE.K. (1998). Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
KlineR.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.New York: Guilford.
20.
KrauseN. (1995). Assessing stress buffering effects: A cautionary note. Psychology and Aging, 10, 518–526.
21.
KrauseN. (2002). A comprehensive strategy for developing closed-ended survey items for use in studies of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S263-S274.
22.
KrauseN. (2008). Aging in the Church: How Social Relationships Affect Health.West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
23.
KrauseN. & EllisonC.G. (2003). Forgiveness by God, forgiveness of others, and psychological well-being in late life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 77–93.
24.
KrauseN. & Ingersoll-DaytonB. (2001). Religion and the process of forgiveness in late life. Review of Religious Research, 42, 252–276.
25.
KrauseN.EllisonC.G. & WulffK.M. (1998). Church-based social support, negative interaction, and psychological well-being: Findings from a national sample of Presbyterians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 725–741.
26.
LundbergC.D. (2010). Unifying Truths of the World's Religions: Practical Principles for Living and Loving in Peace.New Fairfield, CT: Heavenlight Press.
27.
MarkidesK.S. (2003). Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly 1993-1994. Study Number 2851. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
28.
MurphyJ.G. (1997). Repentance, punishment, and mercy. In: EtzioniA. (Ed.), Repentance: A Comparative Perspective (pp. 143–170). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
OlsonJ.M.RoeseN.J.ZannaM.P. (1996). Expectancies. In: HigginsE.T. & KruglanskiA.W. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford.
30.
RadloffL.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
31.
RobertsJ.E.GilboaE. & GotlibI.H. (1998). Ruminative response style and vulnerability to episodes of dysphoria: Gender, neuroticism, and episode duration. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 401–423.
32.
RyeM.S.PargamentK.I.AliM.A.BeckG.L.DorffE.N.HalliseyC.NarayananV. & WilliamsJ.G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In: McCulloughM.E.PargamentK.I. & ThoresenC.E. (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 17–40). New York: Guilford.
33.
Sanchez WalshA.M. (2003). Latino Pentecostal Identity: Evangelical Faith, Self, and Society.New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
ScobieE.D. & ScobieG.E. (1998). Damaging events: The perceived need for forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 28, 373–401.
35.
ShevlinM. & MilesJ.N. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification, and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85–90.
36.
SmithA. (1759/2002). The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SmithA. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.London: Strahan & Cadell.
38.
TornstamL. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A Developmental Theory of Positive Aging.New York: Springer.
39.
TriandisH.C.BetancourtH.BondM.LeungK.BrenesA.GeorgasJ.HuiC.H.MarinG.SetiadiB.SinhaJ.B.VermaJ.SpangenbergJ.TouzardH. & De MontmollinG. (1986). The measurement of etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 257–267.
40.
VincentG.K. & VelkoffV.A. (2010). The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States, 2010-2050.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
41.
WellsJ.A. & StrictlandD.E. (1982). Physiogenic bias as invalidity in psychiatric symptom scales. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 235–252.
42.
YsseldykR.MathesonK. & AnismanH. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71.
