Previous research on religion and helping has left some questions unanswered. In the present study, participants expressed willingness to help groups of people in need (homeless people and illegal immigrants), and this after having been religiously versus non-religiously stimulated. The activation of religious context increased the willingness to help, but only the homeless. Orthodox religious people tended to consider the targets responsible for their problem, an association partially mediated by the belief in a just world for other. Symbolic thinking was associated with willingness for helping, an association partially mediated by the belief in ultimate justice. Results suggest a limited (target) and conditional (thinking style, just world beliefs) prosociality as a consequence of religion.
BaronR.M. & KennyD.A. (1986): The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
2.
BatsonC.D.AndersonS.L. & CollinsE. (2005): Personal religion and prosocial motivation. In: MaherM.L. & KarabenickS.A., editors, Motivation and religion (special issue). Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 14, 151–185.
3.
BatsonC.D.EidelmanS.H.HigleyS.L. & RussellS.A. (2001): “And who is my neighbor?”: II. Quest religion as a source of universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 39–50.
4.
BatsonC.D.FloydR.B.MeyerJ.M. & WinnerA.L. (1999): “And who is my neighbor?”: Intrinsic religion as a source of universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 31–40.
5.
BatsonC.D.SchoenradeP. & VentisW.L. (1993): Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective.New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BègueL. (2002): Beliefs in justice and faith in people: Just world, religiosity and interpersonal trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 375–382.
7.
BègueL. & BastounisM. (2003): Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71, 435–463.
8.
BréchonP. (2003): Integration into Catholicism and Protestantism in Europe: The impact on moral and political values. In: HalmanL. & RiisO., editors, Religion and secularizing society: The Europeans’ religion at the end of the 20th century.Leiden: Brill.
9.
BrickmanP.RabinowitzV.C.KazuraJ.CoatisD.CohnE. & KidderL. (1982): Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368–384.
10.
BurnsteinE.CrandallC. and KitayamaS. (1994): Some neo-Darwinian rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789.
11.
DalbertC. (1999): The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79–97.
12.
DesimpelaereP.SulasF.DuriezB. & HutsebautD. (1999): Psycho-epistemological styles and religious beliefs. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 125–137.
13.
DonahueM.J. & NielsenM.E. (2005): Religion, attitudes, and social behavior. In: PaloutzianR. F. & ParkC.L., editors, Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.New York: Guilford Press.
14.
DuriezB. & HutsebautD. (2000): The relation between religion and racism: The role of post critical beliefs. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 3, 85–102.
15.
DuriezB. & HutsebautD. (in press). A slow and easy introduction to the Post-Critical Belief scale. Internal structure and external relationships. In: WulffD.M., editor, Handbook of the psychology of religion.New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
DzukaJ. & DalbertC. (2002): Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: About the beliefs in a just worlds impact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 732–757.
17.
FontaineJ R.J.DuriezB.LuytenP. & HutsebautD. (2003): The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 501–518.
18.
FurnhamA. (2003): Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.
19.
FurnhamA. & ProctorE. (1989): Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–384.
20.
HaferC.L. & BègueL. (2005): Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.
21.
HansenD.E.VandenbergB. & PattersonM.L. (1995): The effects of religious orientation on spontaneous and nonspontaneous helping behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 101–104.
22.
HunsbergerB.AlisatS.PancerS.M. & PrattM. (1996): Religious fundamentalism and religious doubts: Content, connections, and complexity of thinking. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 201–220.
23.
HunsbergerB. & JacksonL.M. (2005): Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 807–826.
24.
HutsebautD. (1996): Post-Critical Belief: A new approach of the religious attitude problem. Journal of Empirical Theology, 9, 48–66.
25.
JacksonL.M. & EssesV.M. (1997): Of scripture and ascription: The relation between religious fundamentalism and intergroup helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 893–906.
26.
JacksonL.M. & EssesV.M. (2000): Effects of perceived economic competition on people's willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 419–435.
27.
KaiserC.R.VickS. B. & MajorB. (2004): A prospective investigation of the relationship between just world beliefs and the desire for revenge post-September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15, 503–507.
28.
LernerM. (1980): The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion.New York: Plenum Press.
29.
LipkusI.M.DalbertC. & SieglerI.C. (1996): The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677.
30.
MaesJ. (1998): Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice. In: MontadaL. & LernerM. J., editors, Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world.New York: Plenum Press.
31.
MaesJ. & KalsE. (2002): Justice beliefs in school: Distinguishing ultimate and immanent justice. Social Justice Research, 15, 227–244.
32.
MaesJ. & SchmittM. (1999): More on ultimate and immanent justice: Results from the research project “Justice as a problem within reunified Germany”. Social Justice Research, 12, 65–78.
33.
NucciL. & TurielE. (1993): God's word, religious rules, and their relation to Christian and Jewish children's concepts of morality. Child Development, 64, 1475–1491.
34.
PichonI.BoccatoG. & SaroglouV. (2007): Nonconscious prosocial behavior: Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045.
35.
SaroglouV. (2002): Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.
36.
SaroglouV. (2003): Trans-cultural/religious constants vs. cross-cultural/religious differences in psychological aspects of religion. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 25, 71–87.
37.
SaroglouV. (2006): Religion's role in prosocial behavior: Myth or reality? Psychology of Religion Newsletter: American Psychological Association Division 36, 31, 1-8.
38.
SaroglouV., in press: Religion and personality: A Big Five Factor perspective. In: WulffD., editor, Handbook of psychology of religion.New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV. & DernelleR. (2004): Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz's model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734.
40.
SaroglouV.PichonI.TrompetteL.VerschuerenM. & DernelleR. (2005): Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 323–348.
41.
SchwartzS.H. & HuismansS. (1995): Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107.
42.
ShariffA.F. & NorenzayanA. (2007): God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behaviour in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.
43.
SpilkaB.HoodR.W.HunsbergerB. & GorsuchR. (2003): The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (3d ed.).New York: Guilford Press.
44.
SuttonR.M. & DouglasK.M. (2005): Justice for all, or just for me?: More support for self-other differences in just world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–645.
45.
WulffD.M. (1997): Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views (2nd ed.).New York: Wiley.
