AndersonR.M. (1987). Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity. In EliadeM. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Religion. Volume 11. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 229–235.
2.
AsadT. (1993). Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
3.
BellC. (1992). Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice.New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BellC. (1997). Ritual Perspectives and Dimensions.New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BellC. (1998). Performance. In TaylorMark C. (ed.). Critical Terms for Religious Studies.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 205–224.
6.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CappsW.H. (1995). Religious Studies: the Making of a Discipline.Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
8.
CsordasTh. J. (1987). Genre, Motive, and Metaphor: Conditions for Creativity in Ritual and Language.Cultural Anthropology2, 445–469.
9.
CsordasTh. J. (1994). The Sacred Self: A Cultural Phenomenology of Charismatic Healing.Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
10.
CsordasTh. J. (1997). Language, Charisma, and Creativity. The Ritual Life of a Religious Movement.Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ColpeC. (1998). Ritus. In MüllerG. (ed.) Theologische Realenzyklopädie. Band XXIX. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1660–1661.
12.
DeMarinisV. (1997). Religious Ritual Function and the Illusionistic World: Paul Pruyser's Psychology of Religion in Dialogue with Ritual Studies.Archiv für Religionspsychologie, 22, 166–181.
13.
GadamerH.-G. (1986). Text and Interpretation. In WachterhauserB.R. (ed.). Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy.Albany: State University of New York Press, 377–396.
14.
GeertzC. (1993). The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays.London: Fontana Press (first edition 1973).
15.
GoodyJ.R. (1977). Against “Ritual”: Loosely Structured Thoughts on a Loosely Defined Topic. In MooreS.F., and MyerhoffB.G. (eds.). Secular Ritual.Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 25–35.
16.
GrimesR.L. (1982). Beginnings in Ritual Studies.Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
17.
GrimesR.L. (1987): Ritual Studies. In EliadeMircea (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Religion. Volume 12. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 422–425.
18.
HeideggerM. (1927). Sein und Zeit. [Time and Being]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
19.
HeimbrockH.-G., and BoudewijnseH.B. (eds.) (1990). Current Studies on Rituals.Amsterdam: Rodopi.
HunterJ.D. (1983). American Evangelicalism: Conservative Religion and the Quandary of Modernity.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
22.
LoflandJ./SkonovdN. (1981). Conversion Motifs.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 373–385.
23.
LoflandJ./StarkR. (1965). Becoming a World-Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective.American Sociological Review, 30, 862–875.
24.
LuckmannTh. (1987): Kanon und Konversion.[Canon and Conversion.] In: AssmannJ. (Hrsg.): Kanon und Zensur. Beiträge zur Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation II.München: Fink, 38–46.
25.
MarsdenG.M. (1987): Evangelical and Fundamental Christianity. in: EliadeM. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Religion. Volume 5. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 190–197.
26.
MatthesJ. (1992). Auf der Suche nach dem ‘Religiösen’.Sociologica Internationalis, 2, 129–142.
27.
MichaelsA. (1997) (ed.) Klassiker der Religionswissenschaft. [Classical approaches in the Study of Religion]. München: C.H. Beck
28.
MuirE. (1997). Ritual in Early Modern Europe.Cambridge: University Press.
29.
PaloutzianR.F., RichardsonJ.T., and RamboL.R. (1999). Religious Conversion and Personality Change.Journal of Personality, 67, 6, 1047–1079.
30.
Popp-BaierU. (1998). Das Heilige im Profanen. Religiöse Orientierungen im Alltag. Eine qualitative Studie zu religiösen Orientierungen von Frauen aus der charismatisch-evangelikalen Bewegung. [The Sacred in the Profane. Religious Orientations in Everyday Life. A Qualitative Study of Religious Orientations among Women from the Charismatic-Evangelical Movement.] Amsterdam: Rodopi.
31.
Popp-BaierU. (2001). Von der Möglichkeit, ein anderer Mensch zu werden. Psychologische Analysen von Konversionserzählungen. [About the Possibility to become another Person. Psychological Analysis of Conversion Narratives.] Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft.Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 3, 3, 182–201.
32.
Popp-BaierU. (2002). Conversion as Social Construction: A Narrative Approach to Conversion Research. In HermansCh. A.M., ImminkG., de JongA., & van der LansJ. (eds.). Social Constructionism and Theology.Leiden: Brill, pp. 54–67.
33.
RamboL.R. (1993). Understanding religious conversion.New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
34.
RicoeurP. (1971). The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.Social Research, 38, 529–562.
35.
Robertson SmithW. (1969). Lectures on the Religion of the Semites.New York: KTAV Publishing House (first edition: 1889).
36.
SeltzerL.F. (1986). Paradoxical Strategies in Psychotherapy. A Comprehensive Overview and Guidebook.New York: Wiley.
37.
SilversteinS.M. (1988). A Study of Religious Conversion in North America.Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 114, 3, 261–305.
38.
SnowD.A./MachalekR. (1984). The Sociology of Conversion.Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 167–190.
39.
StaplesC.L./MaussA.L. (1987): ‘Conversion or Commitment? A Reassessment of the Snow and Machalek Approach to the Study of Conversion.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion26, 133–147.
40.
StrombergP.G. (1993). Language and Self-Transformation. A Study of the Christian Conversion Narrative.New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
TurnerV. (1982). From Ritual to Theater: The Human Seriousness of Play.New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
42.
UllmannCh. (1989). The Transformed Self. The Psychology of Religious Conversion.New York, London: Plenum Press.
43.
UlmerB. (1988). Konversionserzählungen als rekonstruktive Gattung. Erzählerische Mittel und Strategien bei der Rekonstruktion eines Bekehrungserlebnisses.Zeitschrift für Soziologie17, 19–33.
44.
WaardenburgJ. (1973). Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Aims, Methods and Theories of Research.The Hague: Mouton.