Theodicy Models,Religious Coping Strategies,Self-Image and Post Critical Belief

Abstract

In this study we relate four different measures: the theodicy models proposed by van der Ven, the coping strategies proposed by Pargament, a measure of positive or negative self-image and the post critical belief scales we ourselves have developed.

We analysed the data of 251 Dutch-speaking Belgians. In the analysis we focus on the relation of the different measures with the post critical belief scales. Different types of believers are using different theodicy models, somewhat different coping strategies and we observe some differences in self-image, where believers have a more positive self-image than non-believers. We could suggest that there is a specific theodicy model used by symbolic believers and another theodicy model used by more literal believers. The former could be interpreted as more developed and perhaps more religiously mature.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Information about the PCBS can be found on the web of the Center for the Psychology of Religion: www.psy.kuleuven.ac.be/religion/index1.html

Allport

(1953), The individual and his religion, A psychological Interpretation, New York.

Duriez

, and Hutsebaut

, Fontaine

J.R.J.

(2000). A further elaboration of the Post Critical Belief scales, Psychologica Belgica, 40, 3, 153–181

Fontaine

J.R.J.

, Duriez

, Luyten

, Hutsebaut

The internal structure of the post critical belief scale (submitted article).

Hutsebaut

(1996), Post Critical Belief. A new approach to the religious attitude problem. Journal of Empirical Theology, 9, 2, 48–66.

Hutsebaut

, (1997), Identity statuses, ego integration, God representation and religious cognitive styles, Journal of Empirical Theology, 10, 39–54

Hutsebaut

, (1992). Why does God allow this? An empirical approach to the theodicy question through the themes of suffering and meaning. Ultimate reality and Meaning, 15, 4, 286–295.

Pargament

K.I.

(1997). The psychology of religion and coping. New York: The Guilford Press.

Ricoeur

(1978). The critique of Religion, in Reagan

, and Stewart

(eds.) The Philosophy of P. Ricoeur, An Anthology of His Work, Boston.

10.

Van der Ven

J.A.

(1989). Theodicy or Cosmodicy; a false dilemma. Journal of Empirical Theology, 2, 5–27

11.

Wulff

(1991), Psychology of Religion, Classic and Contemporary Views. New York.

12.

Wulff

(1997), Psychology of Religion, Classic and Contemporary. New York.