The scholarly enterprise known as the psychology of religion can be understood as the psychological study of religious practice, belief, and experience. With one foot in the stream of psychological theory and research and the other in the flow of religious experience and understanding, it seeks to illuminate the latter through use of the former. In other words, religion becomes the object of psychological analysis, that is, in some sense subordinated to psychology (Wulff, 1997). This relative inequality raises significant methodological issues for anyone attempting to study religion in this way. In particular, one is confronted with the prospect of becoming reductionistic, that is, of explaining what is in fact a complex phenomenon in terms too simple and uni-dimensional, distorting (or at least diminishing) the object of study in the process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarryW.A., & ConnollyW.J. (1982): The practice of spiritual direction.San Francisco: Harper & Row.
2.
Beit-HallahmiB. (1992): Between religious psychology and the psychology of religion. In FinnM., & GartnerJ. (Eds.), Object relations theory and religion: Clinical applications (pp. 119–128). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
3.
BergerR.C. (1997): Spiritual direction: Relationships in the presence of God.Listening: Journal of Religion and Culture, 32(2), 116–129.
4.
EidelbergL. (Ed.). (1968): Applied psychoanalysis. In Encyclopedia of psychoanalysis (pp. 40–42). New York: Free Press.
5.
FreudS. (1953-1974): The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 1-24, J. Strachey, Ed. and Trans.). London: Hogarth Press. (Original works published in German)
6.
FreudS. (1907a): Delusions and dreams in Jensen's “Gradiva.” In The standard edition (1959, Vol. 9, pp. 116–127).
7.
FreudS. (1907b): Obsessive actions and religious practices. In The standard edition (1959, Vol. 9, pp. 7–93).
8.
FreudS. (1910): Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood. In The standard edition (1957, Vol. 11, pp. 63–137).
9.
FreudS. (1911): Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia. In The standard edition (1958, Vol. 12, pp. 9–82).
10.
FreudS. (1913): The claims of psycho-analysis to scientific interest. In The standard edition (1955, Vol. 13, pp. 165–190).
11.
FreudS. (1916-17): Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In The standard edition (1963, Vols. 15-16).
12.
FreudS. (1939): Moses and monotheism: Three essays. In The standard edition (1964, Vol. 23, pp. 7–137).
13.
GallaresJ.A. (1992): Toward a multicultural approach to spiritual direction. In RakoczyS. (Ed.), Common journey, different paths: Spiritual direction in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 156–171). Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.
14.
GergenK.J. (1994): Exploring the postmodern: Perils or potentials?American Psychologist, 49(5), 412–416.
15.
GergenK.J., GulerceA., LockA., & MisraG. (1996): Psychological science in cultural context.American Psychologist,51(5), 496–503.
16.
GoveP.B. (Ed.). (1981): Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged.Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.
17.
HanlyC. (1992): The problem of truth in applied psychoanalysis.New York: Guilford.
18.
HardyD.S. (2000a): Redescribing relationships in Christian spiritual direction using Winnicott's psychoanalytic object relations theory (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(12), 6398.
19.
HardyD.S. (2000b): A Winnicottian redescription of Christian spiritual direction relationships: Illustrating the potential contribution of psychology of religion to Christian spiritual practice.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28(4), 251–263.
20.
HoudekF.J. (1996): Guided by the spirit: A Jesuit perspective on spiritual direction.Chicago: Loyola.
21.
JonesA. (1982): Exploring spiritual direction: An essay on Christian friendship.New York: Seabury.
22.
JonesJ.W. (1996): Religion and psychology in transition: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and theology.New Haven, CT: Yale University.
23.
JonesJ.W. (1997): Playing and believing: The uses of D.W. Winnicott in the psychology of religion. In JacobsJ.L., & CappsD. (Eds.), Religion, society, and psychoanalysis: Readings in contemporary theory (pp. 106–126). Boulder, CO: WestviewPress.
24.
JonesS.L. (1994): A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet.American Psychologist, 49(3), 184–199.
25.
KahrB. (1996): D.W. Winnicott: A biographical portrait.Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
26.
KuhnT.S. (1973): The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1962)
27.
KüngH. (1984): Reaction to Freud. In HeaneyJ.J. (Ed.), Psyche and spirit (rev. ed., pp. 21–30). New York: Paulist. (Reprinted from Does God exist? An answer for today, [E. Quinn, Trans.], Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., 1980)
28.
KüngH. (1986, May 29): Religion: The final taboo?Origins [NC Documentary Service],6(2), 26–32. (Address given to the American Psychiatric Association Convention, Washington, D.C., May 12)
29.
LiebertE. (1992): Changing life patterns: Adult development in spiritual direction.New York: Paulist.
30.
MayG.G. (1992): Care of mind care of spirit: Psychiatric dimensions of spiritual direction.San Francisco: HarperCollins. (Original work published 1982)
31.
McCutcheonR.T. (1997): Manufacturing religion: The discourse on sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia.New York: Oxford University.
32.
McDarghJ. (1997): Creating a new research paradigm for the psychoanalytic study of religion. In JacobsJ.L., & CappsD. (Eds.), Religion, society, and psychoanalysis: Readings in contemporary theory (pp. 181–199). Boulder, CO: West view Press.
33.
NevilleR.C. (1996): The truth of broken symbols.Albany, NY: State University of New York.
34.
OgdenT.H. (1994): Subjects of analysis.Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
35.
PaloutzianR.F. (1996): Invitation to the psychology of religion (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
PolingJ.N., & MillerD.E. (1985): Foundations for a practical theology of ministry.Nashville: Abingdon.
37.
RicoeurP. (1970): Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. (D. Savage, Trans.) New Haven, CT: Yale University. (Original work published in French, 1965)
38.
RicoeurP. (1973): Reaction to Freud. In HeaneyJ.J. (Ed.), Psyche and spirit: Readings in psychology and religion (pp. 19–31). New York: Paulist. (Reprinted from Is God dead?, Concilium, 16 [pp. 59–72], New York: Paulist, 1966)
SchlauchC.R. (1999): Neglected questions at the interface of psychology and religion.Pastoral Psychology,47(3), 209–234.
41.
SmithW.C. (1963): The meaning and end of religion: A new approach to the religious traditions of mankind.New York: Macmillan.
42.
SperoM.H. (1992): Religious objects as psychological structures: A critical integration of object relations theory, psychotherapy, and Judaism.Chicago: University of Chicago.
VitzP.C. (1996): Back to human dignity: From modern to postmodern psychology.The Intercollegiate Review, 31(2), 15–23.
45.
WinnicottD.W. (1971): Playing and reality.London: Routledge.
46.
WinnicottD.W. (1975): Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers.New York: Brunner/Mazel. (Original work published 1958)
47.
WinnicottD.W. (1987a): Communication between infant and mother, and mother and infant, compared and contrasted. In WinnicottC., ShepherdR., & DavisM., Eds., Babies and their mothers (pp. 89–103). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Institute for Psycho-Analysis Winter Lectures; Reprinted from What is psychoanalysis?, London: Baillière, Tindall & Cassell, 1968)
48.
WinnicottD.W. (1987b): A man looks at motherhood.In The child, the family, and the outside world (pp. 15–18). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (BBC Radio Broadcast, 1949)
49.
WulffD.M. (1985): Psychological approaches. In WhalingF. (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to the study of religion: Vol. 2: The Social Sciences (pp. 21–88). Berlin: Mouton.
50.
WulffD.M. (1997): Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
