The dominant economic discourse of the industrialized world — in political, academic, and popular terms — is neoclassical economics. A founding proposition is that an “invisible hand” aggregates individual decisions driven by rational self-interest into socially optimal outcomes. We draw upon economics as well as the sociology and philosophy of science to question this fundamental proposition and investigate neoclassical economic theory's dominant position in shaping social and political organization. We document the historical and contingent processes by which the neoclassical narrative has come to dominate the discursive space of capitalist societies. We argue that, contrary to claims of value neutrality, neoclassical economics functions as a master social narrative, or a technology of power, that concentrates power by transferring socio-economic decision-making from multiple sites to the centralized nodes of global economic and political institutions. This transfer occurs through the domination of the discursive space. The “invisible hand” is power.
Akerlof, G.1970“The market for `lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics84:488-500.
2.
Althusser, Louis2001Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
3.
Amariglio, J., And Ruccio D.F.2002“Modern economics: the case of the disappearing body ?” Cambridge Journal of Economics26:81-103.
4.
Barber, Benjamin R.1995Jihad vs. MacWorld. New York, NY: Times Books.
5.
Bernstein, Michael A.1999 “Economic knowledge, professional authority, and the state: The case of American economics during and after WWII.” Pp. 103-123 in R. Garnett, Jr. (ed.), What Do Economists Know?New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, AND Trevor Pinch1987The Social Construction of Technological Systems . Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
7.
Bourdieu, Pierre1984Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
1990Social Space and Symbolic Power In Other Words. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press .
9.
1998Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York, NY: New Press.
10.
Callon, Michel1987 “ Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis.” Pp. 83-103 in W. E. Bijker , T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Constant II, Edward W.1987 “The Social Locus of Technological Practice: Community, System, or Organization.” Pp. 223-244 in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
12.
Daly, Herman1989For the Common Good. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
13.
Fine, Ben2001Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the New Millennium. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
Foucault, Michel1971Order of Things: An Archaeology of theHuman Sciences. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
15.
1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
16.
Gans, Joshua S.1996“On the impossibility of rational choice under incomplete information.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 29:287-309.
17.
Gramsci, Antonio1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: International Publishers.
18.
Grossberg, Lawrence1996 “History, politics, and postmodernism: Stuart Hall and cultural studies.” Pp. 151-173 in D. Morley and K. Chew (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
Hall, Stuart1986 “The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees .” Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2):28-44.
20.
1996 “Gramsci's relevance for the study of race and ethnicity.” Pp. 411-440 in D. Morley and K. Chew (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
Hamilton, Walton1919 “The institutional approach to economic theory .” American Economic Review9:309-318.
22.
Haney, Lynne2000 “Global discourses of need: mythologizing and pathologizing welfare in Hungary.” Pp. 48-73 in M. Burawoy et al. (eds.) Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. Berkeley, MA: University of California Press.
23.
Hardt, Michael AND Antonio Negri2000Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Howard, Nigel1971Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Meta-games and Political Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
Hughes, Thomas P.1983Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
Keen, Steve2001Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor of the Social Sciences . London: Zed Books.
27.
Kelsey, J.1995The New Zealand Experiment: A Model for World Structural Adjustment?Auckland: Auckland University Press.
28.
Kingfisher, Catherine2001 “Producing disunity: The constraints and incitements of welfare to work.” Pp. 273-292 in J. Goode and J. Maskovsky (eds.), New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics, and Impoverished People in the United States. New York, NY: New York University Press.
29.
Klein, P.A.1991 “Why be an economist?” Journal of Economic Issues25:303-318.
30.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
Lux, Kenneth1990Adam Smith's Mistake: How a Moral Philosopher Invented Economics and Ended Morality. Boston, MA: Shambala.
32.
Lyotard, Jean Francois1984The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
1993Toward the Postmodern. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
34.
Mcmichael, Philip2000Development and Social Change: a Global Perspective , 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, CA: Pine Forge Press.
1989More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Mousavi, Shabnam AND Jim Garrison2003 “Toward a Transactional Theory of Decision Making: Creative Rationality as Functional Coordination in Context.” Journal of Economic Methodology10:131-156.
38.
National Public Radio2001Poverty in America. Last accessed December 15, 2003. http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/poll/poverty/.
39.
Newman, Katherine S.1988Falling From Grace: The Experience of Downward Mobility in the American Middle Class. New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
Peil, Jan1999Adam Smith and Economic Science: A Methodological Reinterpretation . Cheltenham: Edward Elger.
41.
Polanyi, Karl1957The Great Transformation. Boston, MA : Beacon Press.
42.
Simon, Herbert A.1979“Rational decision making in business organizations .” The American Economic Review, 69:493-513.
43.
Smith, Adam1965 (1796) An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York, NY: Modern Library.
44.
Smith, A.M.1998Laclau and Mouffe: The Radical Democratic Imaginary . London : Routledge.
45.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.2002Globalization and its Discontents. New York, NY: Norton
46.
Weintraub, E. Roy1999“How should we write the history of twentieth century economics?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy15:139-52.
47.
Wessels, Anke2003 “Displacing mothers from work and welfare .” International Social Science Journal55: 79-88.
48.
Young, Jeffrey T.1997Economics as a Moral Science: The Political Economy of Adam Smith. Cheltenham: Edward Elger .
