Social Theory and the Premise of all Criticism: Max Horkheimer on Religion

Abstract

This essay examines the fragmentary writings of Max Horkheimer on religion. It demonstrates that Horkheimer was consistently drawn to refection on religion throughout his life in response to limitations he perceived within Marxist theory and practice. While he agreed with Marx that the “criticism of religion is the premise of all criticism,” he did not think that “the criticism of religion has been largely complete.” As he struggled to overcome the dogmatism he saw in the Marxism of his age, and in the dominance of scientific method, Horkheimer looked to religion as a site in which one encountered a negative concept of truth, and a substantive moral longing for justice. The essay concludes by exploring two critical evaluations of Hokheimer's perspective.

Keywords

critical theory horkheimer religion.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1995 Negative Dialectics, trans. E.B. Ashton. New York: Continuum.

Adey, Glyn (ed.) 1977 The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. David Frisby. London : Heinemann.

Habermas, Jürgen 1987 The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

1993 “To Seek to Salvage an Unconditional Meaning Without God is a Futile Undertaking: Reflections on a Remark of Max Horkheimer.” Pp. 133-146 in Justification and Application, trans. Ciaran P. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Hook, Sidney 1961 “The New Failure of Nerve.” Pp. 73-94 in The Quest for Being. New York, St. Martin's Press.

Horkheimer, Max AND Theodor W. Adorno 2002 Dialectic of Enlightenment : Philosophical Fragments , ed. G.S. Noerr; trans. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford University Press.

Horkheimer, Max 1974 Eclipse of Reason. New York : The Seabury Press.

1978 Dawn & Decline: Notes 1926-1931 & 1950-1969, trans. Michael Shaw. New York: The Seabury Press.

1985 Gesammelte Schriften, vol 7, ed. Gunzelin Scmid Noerr. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.

10.

1994 Critique of Instrumental Reason, trans. Matthew O'Connell et al. New York: Continuum.

11.

1995 a Between Philosophy and Social Science, trans. G. Frederick Hunter et al. Cambridge: MIT Press .

12.

1995 b Critical Theory, trans. Matthew J. O'Connell. New York: Continuum.

13.

Jay, Martin 1973 The Dialectical Imagination. Boston : Little Brown and Company.

14.

1984 Marxism and Totality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

15.

Kremer, Klaus 1977 “Kritische Theories und Theologie in der Früh- und Spätphilosophie Max Horkheimers.” Pp. 161-179 in Trierer Theologische Zeitschrift, vol. 96.

16.

Mannheim, Karl 1954 Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, trans. Louis Wirth & Edward Shils. New York : Harcourt and Brace.

17.

Marx, Karl 1978 “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right: Introduction.” Pp. 53-65 in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edition, ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: W.W. Norton.

18.

Pege, Kai 1995 Über Horkheimers und Adornos Auffassungen philosophischer Sprachen. Duisburg: Autoren Verlag .

19.

Ries, Wiebrecht 1966 “Die Rettung des Hoffnungslogen. Zur `theologia occulta' in d. Spätphilosophie Horkheimers u. Adornos.” Pp. 69-81 in Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung.