In this paper, I focus on the political influence of class forces surrounding the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (RTAA). The RTAA was instrumental because it shifted much of the trade-policy process from Congress to the Executive Branch. I find that capitalist class relations had a great impact on the development and passage of the RTAA. Despite the concerns of capitalists from the nationalist segment over their ability to influence Executive Branch policy making, the nationalist segment unified with capitalists from the increasingly powerful internationalist segment and were successful in their combined efforts to change the institutional arena within which trade policy was formulated. This research bolsters support for the class embeddedness perspective of trade policy as portrayed in the works of Domhoff (1990), Prechel (1990), and Dreiling (2000). Further, it contributes to this work by explaining the historical foundation for the class embeddedness of contemporary foreign trade policy debate as established by capitalist class relations and changes in state organizational structures during the New Deal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahams, Paul P.1969 “American Bankers and the Economic Tactics of Peace: 1919.” Journal of American History56(3):572-583.
2.
Akard, Patrick J.1996 “The Political Origins of “Supply-Side” Economic Policy: The HumphreyHawkins Bill and the Revenue Act of 1978.” Political Power and Social Theory10:95-148.
3.
Arrighi, Giovanni, Po-Keung Hui, Krishnendu Ray AND Thomas E. Reifer1999 “Geopolitics and High Finance.” Pp. 37-96 in Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System , edited by Giovanni Arrighi and Beverly Silver.Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Audley, John J.1997Green Politics and Global Trade: NAFTA and the Future of Environmental Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5.
Beetham, David1987Bureaucracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Block, Fred1977The Origins of International Economic Disorder: A Study of United States International Monetary Policy from World War II to the Present . Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
1977b “The Ruling Class does not Rule.” Socialist Review7:6-28.
8.
Conforti, Joseph M.1995 “New Class Divisions in the United States .” Critical Sociology21(2):43-52.
9.
Cohen, Stephen D.1994The Making of United States International Economic Policy , Fourth Edition. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
10.
Domhoff, G. William1970The Higher Circles. New York : Random House.
11.
1990The Power Elite and the State: How Policy is Made in America . New York: Aldine De Gruyter .
12.
Dreiling, Michael C.2000 “The Class Embeddedness of Corporate Political Action: Leadership in Defense of the NAFTA.” Social Problems47(1):21-48.
13.
Eckes, Alfred E., JR.1995Opening America's Market: U.S. Foreign Policy Since 1776. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
14.
Finegold, Kenneth AND Theda Skocpol1995State and Party in America's New Deal. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
15.
Freiden, Jeff1988 “ Sectoral Conflict and U.S. Foreign Economic Policy, 1914-1940.” Pp. 59-90 in The State and American Foreign Economic Policy , edited by John G. Ikenberry, David A. Lake and Michael Mastanduno.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Goldstein, Judith1993Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
Haggard, Stephen1988 “The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934.” Pp. 91-119 in The State and American Foreign Economic Policy, edited by John G. Ikenberry, David A. Lake, and Michael Mastanduno.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
Hull, Cordell1948The Memoirs of CordellHull. New York: Macmillan Company.
19.
Kaufman, Burton Ira1971 “United States and Latin America: The Wilson Years .” Journal of American History58(September): 342-63.
20.
Krasner, Stephen D.1978Defending the National Interest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Lake, David A.1988 “The State and American Trade Strategy in the Pre-hegemonic Era.” Pp. 33-58 in The State and American Foreign Economic Policy , edited by John G. Ikenberry, David A. Lake and Michael Mastanduno.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
Levine, Rhonda1988Class Struggle and the New Deal. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
23.
Marquis, Albert Nelson1932Who's Who in America, Volume 17. Chicago: The A.N. Marquis Company .
24.
Pastor, Robert A.1980Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Economic Policy, 1929-1976. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
Peek, George1936Why Quit Our Own. New York: D.Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
26.
Prechel, Harland1990 “Steel and the State: Industry Politics and Business Policy Formation, 19401989.” American Sociological Review55(5):648-668.
27.
Ratner, Sidney1972The Tariff in American History. New York, NY: D. Van Nostrand Company.
28.
Rhodes, Carolyn1993Reciprocity, U.S. Trade Policy, and the GATT Regime . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Russell, James W.1995 “Operation Bootstrap and NAFTA: Comparing the Social Consequences.” Critical Sociology21(2):91-108.
30.
Schattschneider, E.E.1935Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. New York, NY: Arno Press.
31.
Scheiber, Harry1969 “World War I as Entrepreneurial Opportunity: Willard Straight and the American International Corporation.” Political Science Quarterly84(3):486-511.
32.
Skidmore, Dan AND Davita Silfen Glasberg1996 “State Theory and Corporate Welfare: The Crisis and Bailout of the Savings and Loan Industry From a Contingency Perspective.” Political Power and Social Theory10:149-191.
33.
Skocpol, Theda1980 “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxists Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society10:155-201.
34.
1985Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” Pp. 3-37 in Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
U.S. Congress, House1934a Message from the President of the United States Transmitting A Request to Authorize the Executive to Enter Into Executive Commercial Agreements with Foreign Nations. 73rd Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
36.
1934 b Committee on Ways and Means. 1934b. Amend Tariff Act of 1930: Reciprocal Trade Agreements. 73rd Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
U.S. Congress, Senate1934Public No. 316. Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act. 73rd Congress . Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
38.
Wilson, Joan Hoff1971American Business & Foreign Policy 1920-1933 . Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
