In this summary of my recent book (Kirkpatrick, 2004), I outline a general theoretical approach for the psychology of religion and develop one component of it in detail. First I review arguments and research demonstrating the utility of attachment theory for understanding many aspects of religious belief and behavior, particularly within modern Christianity. I then introduce evolutionary psychology as a general paradigm for psychology and the social sciences, arguing that religion is not an adaptation in the evolutionary sense but rather a byproduct of numerous psychological systems that evolved for other adaptive purposes, of which the attachment system is just one example. I conclude by summarizing numerous advantages of this framework over other extant approaches to the psychology of religion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinsworthM. D. S. (1985). Attachments across the life span.Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61, 792–812.
2.
AinsworthM. D. S., BleharM. C., WatersE., & WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AllportG. W. (1950). The individual and his religion.New York: Macmillan.
4.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
AtranS. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
AverillJ. (1998. Spirituality: From the mundane to the meaningful—and back.Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 18, 101–126.
7.
BatsonC. D. (1983). Sociobiology and the role of religion in promoting prosocial behavior: An alternative view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1380–1385.
8.
BelskyJ., SteinbergL., & DraperP. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategies: An evolutionary theory of socialization.Child Development, 62, 647–670.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1. Attachment.New York: Basic.
10.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss. Vol. 2. Separation.New York: Basic.
11.
BoyerP. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion.Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
BoyerP. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought.New York: Basic.
13.
BurkertW. (1996). Creation of the sacred: Tracks of biology in early religions.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
BussD. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science.Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.
15.
CampbellD. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition.American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.
16.
FrankR. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions.New York: Norton.
17.
FreudS. (1961). The future of an illusion.New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1927).
18.
GranqvistP. (1998). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: On the question of compensation or correspondence.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 350–367.
19.
GranqvistP., & KirkpatrickL. A. (2004). Religious conversion and perceived childhood attachment: A meta-analysis.International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 223–250.
20.
GuthrieS. G. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion.New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
HazanC., & ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
22.
HoodR. W.Jr., SpilkaB., HunsbergerB., & GorsuchR. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (2nd Ed.). New York: Guilford.
23.
JamesW. (1902). Varieties of religious experience.New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
24.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1998). Evolution, pair-bonding, and reproductive strategies: A reconceptualization of adult attachment. In SimpsonJ. A., & RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 353–393). New York: Guilford.
25.
KirkpatrickL. A. (2004). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion.New York: Guilford.
26.
MithenS. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of art, religion, and science.London: Thames and Hudson.
27.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works.New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
28.
RidleyM. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation.New York: Viking.
29.
ShaverP. R., HazanC., & BradshawD. (1988). Love as attachment: The integration of three behavioral systems. In SternbergR. J., & BarnesM. (Eds.), The anatomy of love (pp. 68–99). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
SmartN. (1976). The religious experience of mankind (2nd Ed.). New York: Scribners.
31.
SteadmanL. B., PalmerC. T., & TilleyC. F. (1996). The universality of ancestor worship.Ethnology, 35(1), 63–76.
32.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ. H., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
