This research examines whether religious conceptions of guilt in Protestant and Roman Catholic groups account for constructive or non-constructive guilt-reactions and for different guilt-frequency. Participants in three groups filled in the Leuven Guilt and Shame Scale (LEGSS), the Leuven Emotion Scale (LES) and the Post Critical Belief Scale (PCBS). Protestants were expected to experience more non-constructive guilt than Catholics, who were expected to experience more constructive guilt. Both were expected to have a higher frequency of guilt experience than the control group. Differences between the groups were found: Catholics show more constructive guilt reactions than the other groups. Differences in non-constructive guilt reactions were not found. The Protestant and Catholic group experienced guilt more frequently than the control group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyleM., & DelinP. (1965). Non-universal laws of socialization,Human-relations, 1877–86 [247].
2.
BatsonC.D., SchoenradeP., & VentisW.L., (1992). Religion and the Individual, a social-psychological perspective, Oxford University Press, New York.
BaumeisterR.F., StillwellA.M., & ExlineJ.J. (1999). Virtue, personality and social relations: self-control as the moral muscle.Journal of Personality, 67, 1165–1194.
5.
BelgumDavid (1963). Guilt, where psychology and religion meet, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
6.
BybeeJ. (1998). Guilt and children, Academic Press, San Diego/London.
7.
DuriezB., SoenensB., & HutsebautD. (in press). Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale,Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 851–857.
8.
ErikssonE. (1963). Childhood and society, W.W. Norton and Company Inc., New York.
9.
FischerL., and Scott RichardsP. (1998). Religion and guilt in childhood. In: Bybee, J. (1998). Guilt and children, Academic Press, San Diego/London.
10.
FontaineJ.R.J., LuytenP., De BoeckP., CorveleynJ., FernandezM., HerreraD., IttzésA., TomcsányiT., & EgyetemS. (in press). Untying the Gordian knot of guilt and shame: The structure of guilt and shame reactions based on situation and person variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
11.
FontaineJ.R.J., DuriezB., LuytenP., & HutsebautD. (2003). The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale.Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 501–518.
FreudS. (1961). Civilization and its discontents, W.W. Norton, New York.
14.
FriedmanM. (1985). Toward a reconceptualization of guilt,Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 21, 501–547.
15.
FrijdaN.H. (1986). The Emotions.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16.
HeggenF.J., (1988). Omgaan met schuld in de christelijke geloofsgemeenschap, Gooi en Sticht, Hilversum.
17.
HoffmanM.L. (1970b). Conscience, personality and socialization techniques,Human Development, 13, 90–126. In Bybee, J. Guilt and children (1997).
18.
HutsebautD. (1996). Post Critical Belief: A new approach of the religious attitude problem.Journal of Empirical Theology,9(2), 48–66.
19.
IzardC.E. (1977). Human Emotion, Plenum Press, New York.
20.
JungC.G. (1957). Psychology und Religion, Rascher Verlag, Zurich.
21.
KettunenP. (2002). The Function of Confession: a study based on experiences, Pastoral Psychology, sept 2002, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 13–25.
22.
KohutH., GoldbergA. (Ed.) (1984). How does analysis cure?Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
23.
KohutH., GoldbergA. (Ed.) (1971). The analysis of self.International University Press, New York.
24.
LazarusR.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation.Oxford University Press, London.
25.
LewisH.B. (1971). Shame and Guilt in Neurosis, International Universities Press, New York.
26.
MeadM. (1952). Some anthropological considerations concerning guilt. In ReymertM.L. (Ed.), Feelings and emotions, McGraw-Hill, New York.
27.
PargamentK.I., KennellJ., HathawayW., GrevengoedN., NewmanJ., JonesW. (1988). Religion and the problem-solving process: Three styles of coping.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27(1), 90–104.
28.
ParkC., CohenL.H., & HerbL. (1990). Intrinsic religiousness and religious coping as life stress moderators for Catholics versus Protestants,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 551–577.
29.
PiersG., & SingerM.B. (1955). Shame and guilt: a psychoanalytic and a cultural study.Charles C. Thomas, Oxford, UK.
30.
PronkP. (2003). In zonde ontvangen en geboren, Ten Have, Baarn.
31.
SchilderA. (1987). Hulpeloos maar schuldig, Kok, Kampen.
32.
TangneyJ.P., & FischerK.W. (Eds.) (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride.Guilford Press, New York.
33.
TangneyJ.P., & FischerK.W. (Eds.) (1998). How does guilt differ from shame? In BybeeJ. (Ed.), Guilt and children, pp. 1–17, Academic Press, San Diego/London.
34.
TangneyJ.P., & DearingR. (2002). Shame and guilt, Guilford, New York.
35.
VergoteA. (1988). Guilt and Desire: Relgious attitudes and their pathological derivatives (M.H. Wood, Trans.), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
36.
WulffD.M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views.Wiley, New York.
37.
Zahn-WaxlerC., & KochanskaG. (1990). The origins of guilt. In ThompsonR. (Ed.) Nebraska symposium on motivation, vol. 6, socio-emotional development (pp. 183–253) University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
