Enhanced CO 2 Adsorption and Selectivity of CO 2 /N 2 on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

Abstract

The ZIF-8 crystals were successfully postsynthetically modified using methylamine (MA), ethylenediamine (ED), and N, N $^{'}$ -dimethylethylenediamine (MMEN) to improve their adsorption performance toward CO₂. Results showed that, compared with the original ZIF-8, the BET specific surface area of MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 has increased by 118.2%, 92.0%, and 29.8%, respectively. In addition, their total pore volume increased separately by 130.8%, 100%, and 48.7%. The adsorption capacities of CO₂ on the amine-modified ZIF-8 samples followed the order $MA - ZIF - 8 > MMEN - ZIF - 8 > ED - ZIF - 8 > ZIF - 8$ . The CO₂ adsorption capacities at 298 K on MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 were increased by 118.2%, 90.2%, and 29.8%, respectively. What is more, the CO₂/N₂ selectivities calculated using an IAST model of the amine@ZIF-8 samples at 0.01 bar and 298 K were also significantly improved and followed the order $MA - ZIF - 8 (31.4) > ED - ZIF - 8 (25.1) > MMEN - ZIF - 8 (14.1) > ZIF - 8 (11.5)$ , which increased by 173.0%, 121.4%, and 22.6%, respectively. The isosteric heat of CO₂ adsorption ( $Q_{st}$ ) on the MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 all becomes higher, while $Q_{st}$ of N₂ on these samples was slightly lower in comparison with that on the ZIF-8. Furthermore, after six recycle runs of gravimetric CO₂ adsorption-desorption on MA-ZIF-8, the adsorption performance of CO₂ is still very good, indicating that the MA-ZIF-8 sample has good regeneration performance and can be applied into industrial CO₂ adsorption and separation.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the rising level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has become one of the biggest problems worldwide. As the main component of greenhouse gases, CO₂ contributes the most to global warming and climate change [1]. To date, the global CO₂ concentration has increased from 270 to 400 ppm with the industrial development and is anticipated to approach 950 ppm by 2100, which will bring about sincere environmental problems such as extreme weather, glacial melting, and ocean acidification [2, 3]. Therefore, reducing carbon dioxide emission has been proposed to be a scientific challenge of the highest order and thus has been explored by many researchers throughout the world utilizing different technologies [4–7]. Among these technologies, chemical absorption with aqueous organic amines like diethanolamine (DEA) has been widely used for CO₂ capture from industrial waste gases for some time, but they are still subject to volatilization or degradation of organic amines, instrument corrosion, and high energy consumption for solvent regeneration [8–10]. Therefore, adsorption technology using various kinds of solid porous adsorbents has been proposed for CO₂ capture and separation.

Different types of adsorbents have been investigated and developed for CO₂ adsorption, for example, carbon-based materials, zeolites, metal oxides, and mesoporous silica [7, 11–18]. Nevertheless, these conventional porous materials usually display limited performance toward CO₂ adsorption capacity as well as selectivity. Metal-Organic frameworks (MOFs) composed of metal ions and organic linkers, also known as porous coordination polymers, have developed rapidly and attracted significant attentions in the past two decades [19–26]. Owing to their diverse framework structure, high crystallinity, large surface area, and unlimited adjustability of pore structures and surface functionalities, MOFs exhibit great application prospects in the field of CO₂ capture [14, 15, 21, 23, 27–37]. Nevertheless, it still remains a challenge to design MOFs with quite high CO₂/N₂ selectivity as well as CO₂ adsorption capacity since the large surface area of MOFs usually leads to both increased CO₂ and N₂ adsorption capacities, resulting in limited CO₂/N₂ adsorption selectivity.

Many researches have tried to improve both the CO₂ adsorption capacity and selectivity of MOFs, for instance, ligand functionalization [38, 39], incorporation of open metal sites [29, 40, 41], construction of specific pores [17], and pre-/postmodification for amine grafting/impregnation [36, 42–48]. Zhu et al. [42] reported that the polyethyleneimine-modified UiO-66-NH₂ (Zr) exhibited a considerable enhancement toward CO₂/N₂ adsorption selectivity (48 vs. 25) and moderate desorption energy (68 kJ/mol CO₂). Additionally, Justin et al. [49] described that the tris (2-aminoethyl) amine- (TAEA-) appended-Zn₄O (NH₂-BDC)_1.2(BrAcNH-BDC)_1.8 displayed a dramatically increased CO₂/N₂ (15/85) selectivity (143) at 313 K and a zero-coverage $Q_{st}$ of CO₂ adsorption of 62.5 kJ/mol. However, the high heat of adsorption owing to the strong interaction usually signifies high energy for adsorbent regeneration process. Thus, the development of adsorbents with high CO₂ adsorption capacity, CO₂/N₂ selectivity, moderate energy consumption, and good stability still remains a challenge for real application.

In the current work, in order to improve its CO₂ adsorption capacity and CO₂/N₂ selectivity, the ZIF-8 will be postsynthetically modified by using methylamine (MA), ethylenediamine (ED), and N, N $^{'}$ -dimethylethylenediamine (MMEN) to obtain a series of novel amine@ZIF-8 materials. Then, the pore structure, PXRD, surface chemistry, and thermogravimetric stability of the prepared amine@ZIF-8 materials would be characterized. The pure-component CO₂ and N₂ isotherms on the amine@ZIF-8 would be measured separately at ambient temperatures. In addition, the equimolar CO₂/N₂ selectivity is estimated by using an ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) model. Moreover, the $Q_{st}$ of CO₂ adsorption on the amine@ZIF-8 was calculated. Finally, the reusability of amine@ZIF-8 toward CO₂ adsorption was also investigated. The multiple gravimetric adsorption-desorption performance is expected to provide an application basis for industrial CO₂ capture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Zn (NO₃)₂·6H₂O (Alfa Aesar, 99.99% purity), was purchased from Alfa Aesar Chemical; 2-methylimidazole (98% purity), N, N $^{'}$ -dimethylformamide (99.9%), anhydrous methanol (99.8%), ammonia (analytical pure), methylamine (analytical pure), and N, N $^{'}$ -dimethylethylenediamine (97%)were bought from J&K Chemical; chloroform (analytical pure) was obtained from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory; and ethylenediamine (≥99.5%) was purchased from Aladdin.

2.2. Synthesis and Modification

Preparation and amine modification of ZIF-8 were carried out according to the reported procedures with a few modifications [50, 51]. The concentration gradients of methylamine (MA), ethylenediamine (ED), and N, N $^{'}$ -dimethylethylenediamine (MMEN) used are listed in Table S1. In this work, the MA-modified ZIF-8 with different concentrations were named as MA1-ZIF-8, MA2-ZIF-8, etc. The name of ED-modified ZIF-8 and MMEN-modified ZIF-8 was in the same manner.

2.3. Characterization

The PXRD patterns were obtained by an X-ray diffractometer (D8 advance, Bruker) using Cu Kα line focused radiation (wavelength $λ = 0.15406$ nm). The chemical bonds and surface organic groups were observed using a FTIR spectrophotometer (Bruker TENSOR II Apparatus, Bruker Optics Inc., Germany). The thermal stability was characterized by using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TA-550 apparatus, TA Instruments, USA). The porous structures were analysed using a Quantachrome Autosorb IQ2 instrument. All the tested samples were degassed at 473 K under vacuum overnight.

2.4. CO₂ and N₂ Adsorption Isotherms at Ambient Temperature

The specific adsorbed amounts of pure CO₂ and N₂ were measured using a static volumetric method on the Quantachrome Autosorb IQ2 instrument at three temperatures (273 K, 288 K, and 298 K, respectively). The initial activation of amine@ZIF-8 materials was performed at 523 K for 8 h under vacuum. Helium (ultrahigh purity) was the purge gas; CO₂ and N₂ were both of 99.999% purities.

2.5. Reusability Assessment

The regeneration performance was studied to evaluate the recyclability of the amine@ZIF-8. In this study, both volumetric and gravimetric adsorption-desorption cycles were carried out. For the volumetric experiments, multiple CO₂ adsorption-desorption cycles on amine@ZIF-8 were operated by the Quantachrome Autosorb IQ2 instrument at 298 K. During each cycle, the maximum adsorption pressure was set at 1 bar; while the minimum desorption pressure was 1 mbar. The whole desorption process was under vacuum at 473 K for 8 h. For the gravimetric method, the six adsorption-desorption cycles were determined on a TA550 system under different regeneration temperatures (125°C and 150°C, respectively) [52, 53]. Before the recycle experiment, 5 mg of modified ZIF-8 sample was put in a platinum pan and heated to 150°C with a speed of 10°C/min and under high-purity N₂ (99.999%, 60 mL/min) to desorb any preadsorbed gases on the surfaces of the sample. Then, the sample was retained under N₂ atmosphere until a constant weight was reached at 25°C. After that, the gas was switched to a CO₂/N₂ mixture stream (60 mL/min of total flow, 90% CO₂, balance N₂) and kept for 30 min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

The postsynthetic modification route is demonstrated in Scheme 1. The amount of amine grafted on the ZIF-8 material is the key factor that may greatly affect its porous structure. Figure 1 shows the PXRD patterns of amine@ZIF-8 materials. Clearly, the modified ZIF-8 materials all show diffraction peaks at 7.29°, 10.32°, 12.65°, 16.50°, and 18.01°. These peaks are the same as the characteristics of the diffraction spectrum of the original ZIF-8. The peak positions are also consistent as compared to the simulated ZIF-8, implying that amine@ZIF-8 materials still maintain a complete crystal structure without structural collapse [30].

Scheme 1

Preparation of amine-functionalized ZIF-8 using three different amines.

Figure 1

PXRD patterns of ZIF-8 and amine-modified ZIF-8 samples.

Figure 2 depicts the N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K on amine@ZIF-8 materials. Obviously, the tested amine@ZIF-8 materials all presented typical type I behaviour, suggesting that there were mainly micropores in nature. Interestingly, hystereses were observed for the amine@ZIF-8 samples in the pressure range of 0.96-1.0. These hystereses were ascribed to the formed pores between the gaps of modified ZIF-8 particles, not owing to the mesopores.

Figure 2

N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms of modified ZIF-8 samples at 77 K.

Table 1 lists the parameters of porous structures for amine@ZIF-8. It can be seen that with the increase of MA, ED, and MMEN, the BET specific surface areas all showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. In addition, the total pore volume also presented the same trend as well as the micropore volume. Compared with the original ZIF-8, the BET specific surface areas of MA2-ZIF-8, MMEN2-ZIF-8, and ED1-ZIF-8 increased by 118.2%, 92.0%, and 29.8%, respectively. Furthermore, their total pore volume increased separately by 130.8%, 100%, and 48.7%. Moreover, the micropore volumes of MA2-ZIF-8, MMEN2-ZIF-8, and ED1-ZIF-8 raised separately by 110.8%, 75.7%, and 18.9%. Thereafter, the MA2-ZIF-8, ED1-ZIF-8, and MMEN2-ZIF-8 can be recognized as the three best samples among the amine@ZIF-8 materials, and they would be marked as MA-ZIF-8, ED-ZIF-8, and MMEN-ZIF-8, respectively, in the following adsorption experiments. However, it should be pointed out that the BET surface area of the as-made ZIF-8 was lower than that synthesized by Park et al. [54], but still in the range of the reported ZIF-8 (see Table S2). This, possibly, indicated that the prepared ZIF-8 in this work still contained some residual species in the cavities (e.g., CHCl₃, DMF, or unreacted Hmim) which could not desorbed during the activated step. In addition, the different results between these three amine@ZIF-8 samples were probably owing to the different reactivities of amines. Therefore, the reason of the increases of the BET surface area and pore volume might be that, after the postsynthetic modification, some occlusive pores of the ZIF-8 were reopened, and more new pores were formed at meanwhile [45]. Nevertheless, when the loading amount of MA, ED, and MMEN added further, the surface areas and pore volumes begun to decrease because of hindrance effect of the introduced amines [55, 56].

Table 1

Texture properties of the amine-modified ZIF-8 samples.

Samples	$S_{BET}$ (m²/g)	$V_{micro}$ (cm³/g)	Average diameter (Å)	$V_{total}$ (cm³/g)
ZIF-8	1038	0.37	14.92	0.39
MA1-ZIF-8	1435	0.49	21.91	0.79
MA2-ZIF-8	2265	0.78	15.88	0.90
MA3-ZIF-8	1545	0.54	16.06	0.62
ED1-ZIF-8	1347	0.44	17.19	0.58
ED2-ZIF-8	1257	0.43	15.77	0.50
MMEN1-ZIF-8	1963	0.67	16.47	0.81
MMEN2-ZIF-8	1994	0.65	15.69	0.78
MMEN3-ZIF-8	1899	0.65	14.74	0.70

Figure S1 exhibits the DFT pore size distributions of ZIF-8 and amine@ZIF-8 materials. Apparently, for each MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 material, the main pore size was lower than that of the as-made ZIF-8. Figure 3 demonstrates the DFT pore size distributions for the best amine@ZIF-8 materials. It can be noticed that the main pore size of the original ZIF-8 is distributed at 10.87 Å, while those of the MA-ZIF-8, ED-ZIF-8, and MMEN-ZIF-8 are distributed at around 9.26 Å, suggesting that the introduction of an amine group would result in reduced pore size [47]. This might be due to the new formed pores with the introduction of MA, ED, and MMEN, respectively. The reduced pore size also indicated that there were mainly micropores in the amine@ZIF-8 frameworks.

Figure 3

DFT pore size distribution for ZIF-8 and amine-modified ZIF-8 materials.

Figure 4 illustrates the infrared spectra of amine@ZIF-8 materials. First of all, the infrared spectra of amine@ZIF-8 materials were basically similar to those of ZIF-8. Secondly, the peak intensities of MA-ZIF-8 and ED-ZIF-8 material at around 3136 cm^-1 were significantly enhanced, and at 2960 cm^-1 and 2930 cm^-1, the intensities of the antisymmetric stretching vibration peaks of -CH₃ and -CH₂ increased, too. Thirdly, after the modification, a new N-H stretching vibration peak appeared at about 3136 cm^-1, signifying the successful introduction of N-H bond into MMEN-ZIF-8, MA-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 materials. Fourthly, the antisymmetric stretching vibration peaks of -CH₃ and -CH₂ increased at around 2960 cm^-1 and 2930 cm^-1 after the modification, indicating that two groups -CH₃ and -CH₂ were introduced after modification. In summary, after ZIF-8 materials are modified with different organic amine groups, N-H bonds have been successfully introduced. The thermal stability of amine@ZIF-8 was evaluated by TGA experiment under N₂ flow from 30°C to 800°C (see FIGURE S2). It can be evidently seen that the modified ZIF-8 materials all had better thermal stability than ZIF-8, while the MA-ZIF-8 was even stable up to 427°C.

Figure 4

FTIR spectra of MA-ZIF-8, ED-ZIF-8, and MMEN-ZIF-8.

3.2. CO₂ and N₂ Adsorption on Amine@ZIF-8 at Ambient Temperature

3.2.1. CO₂ Adsorption Isotherms on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

Figure 5 exhibits the CO₂ adsorption isotherms of amine@ZIF-8 materials at different temperatures (298 K, 288 K, and 273 K). Clearly, the CO₂ adsorption capacities of amine@ZIF-8 materials increased dramatically at each temperature. At 298 K, their CO₂ amounts adsorbed were in the following way: $MA - ZIF - 8 > MMEN - ZIF - 8 > ED - ZIF - 8 > ZIF - 8$ . Moreover, by comparison with the original ZIF-8, the CO₂ adsorption capacities on MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 increased by 118.2%, 90.2%, and 29.8%, respectively. This may be caused by the obvious increase in the BET surface area and micropore pore volume of amine@ZIF-8 materials [52]. In addition, the N-H group introduced would also promote their adsorption performance toward CO₂.

Figure 5

The CO₂ adsorption isotherms on the amine@ZIF-8 materials at 273 K, 288 K, and 298 K. (a) ZIF-8; (b) MA-ZIF-8; (c) ED-ZIF-8; (d) MMEN-ZIF-8.

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2.2. N₂ Adsorption Isotherms on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

Figure 6 displays the N₂ adsorption isotherms on amine@ZIF-8 materials at different temperatures (298 K, 288 K, and 273 K). It can be observed that the N₂ adsorption capacities of amine@ZIF-8 materials significantly increased. And, the order of their adsorption capacity for N₂ is as follows: $MA - ZIF - 8 > MMEN - ZIF - 8 > ED - ZIF - 8 > ZIF - 8$ . Moreover, compared with the original ZIF-8 material, the adsorption capacity of MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 for N₂ increased by 42.2%, 33.3%, and 15.0%, respectively. The increase might be due to the increased specific surface area and total pore volume after amine modification.

Figure 6

The N₂ adsorption isotherms on the amine@ZIF-8 materials at 273 K, 288 K, and 298 K. (a) ZIF-8; (b) MA-ZIF-8; (c) ED-ZIF-8; (d) MMEN-ZIF-8.

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. Adsorption Selectivity of CO₂ vs. N₂ on Amine@ZIF-8 at Ambient Temperature

The ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) developed by Myers and Praunitz was proved to be an efficient method to evaluate the adsorption equilibrium of gas mixtures and selectivity using single-component isotherms [45]. Before carrying out the IAST simulation, the single-component adsorption isotherms of CO₂ and N₂ were separately fitted by the dual-site Langmuir-Freundlich (DSLF) equation (see equation S1).

Figure 7 presents the single-component isotherms and the DSLF fitted ones. Obviously, the DSLF model can be applied favourably to fit the single-component adsorption data. From the fitting parameters listed in Table 2, it can be observed that the correlation coefficients $R^{2}$ are all up to 0.9999, implying the well fitted single-component isotherms using the DSLF model. Figure 8 exhibits predicted selectivities of amine@ZIF-8 materials as a function of total bulk pressure for equimolar CO₂ and N₂ mixtures at 298 K. Clearly, the CO₂/N₂ selectivity of amine@ZIF-8 materials decreased with the increase of pressure. Moreover, the adsorption selectivities of CO₂/N₂ on amine@ZIF-8 materials are always higher than those of ZIF-8, particularly in the low-pressure region. Furthermore, the CO₂/N₂ selectivity on MA-ZIF-8 is the highest in the pressure range. And, the CO₂/N₂ adsorption selectivities on the amine@ZIF-8 were in the order of $MA - ZIF - 8 > ED - ZIF - 8 > MMEN - ZIF - 8 > ZIF - 8$ . Especially, at 0.01, 0.5, and 1.0 bar, the CO₂/N₂ selectivities of MA-ZIF-8 were up to 31, 16, and 14, respectively, which is almost three times of those of the original ZIF-8.

Figure 7

DSLF fitting of the CO₂ and N₂ isotherms on the amine@ZIF-8 at 298 K: (a) CO₂; (b) N₂.

(b)

Table 2

The fitting parameters of the DLSF model for the pure component isotherms of CO₂ and N₂ at 298 K.

	ZIF-8		MA-ZIF-8		ED-ZIF-8		MMEN-ZIF-8
	CO₂	N₂	CO₂	N₂	CO₂	N₂	CO₂	N₂
$R^{2}$	0.9999	0.9999	0.9999	0.9999	0.9999	0.9999	0.9999	0.9999
$q_{m, 1}$ (mmol/g)	9.603	0.4885	31.29	1.162	25.40	0.5662	25.51	0.6675
$q_{m, 2}$ (mmol/g)	0.8383	0.1881	2.546	0.2749	2.053	0.1524	3.318	0.1175
$b_{1}$ (kPa^-1)	0.0004380	0.001094	0.0002336	0.0005896	0.0002480	0.001083	0.0001730	0.001058
$b_{2}$ (kPa^-1)	0.0001580	0.0008590	0.001621	0.0005974	0.0007272	0.0007152	0.0008817	0.0006616
$n_{1}$	0.9304	0.8905	0.9209	0.9342	0.9453	0.9039	0.9223	0.9155
$n_{2}$	1.867	0.9500	1.328	1.104	1.382	0.9077	0.9883	0.9011

Figure 8

The IAST-predicted selectivities for equimolar CO₂ and N₂ at 298 K as a function of total bulk pressure.

3.4. Isosteric Heat of Adsorption

The isosteric heat of adsorption ( $Q_{st}$ ) determines the regeneration temperature of adsorbents used during a PSA or TSA process. The enthalpies of CO₂ adsorption (at 273 K, 288 K, and 298 K) on ZIF-8, MA-ZIF-8, ED-ZIF-8, and MMEN-ZIF-8 materials were calculated with the virial method [57, 58]. Figure 9(a) shows the $Q_{st}$ of CO₂ on the amine@ZIF-8 materials. Obviously, at the very beginning of adsorption, the $Q_{st}$ values were in the following order: $MA - ZIF - 8 > MMEN - ZIF - 8 > ED - ZIF - 8 > ZIF - 8$ , suggesting a much stronger interaction between CO₂ and amine@ZIF-8 frameworks. Besides, the $Q_{st}$ of CO₂ evidently decreased with the increase of CO₂ amounts adsorbed on the amine@ZIF-8. This phenomenon can be attributed to the surface heterogeneity of the amine@ZIF-8 samples. Figure 9(b) shows that $Q_{st}$ of N₂ adsorption on the amine@ZIF-8. As compared to Figure 9(a), it is visible that the $Q_{st}$ of N₂ on each of the material was lower than that of CO₂, confirming the favorable selectivity of the modified ZIF-8 materials for CO₂/N₂. Moreover, the $Q_{st}$ of N₂ on the amine@ZIF-8 are all almost independent of the N₂ uptake, indicating the weak interaction between N₂ and the modified ZIF-8 material. In addition, the $Q_{st}$ of CO₂ on ED-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and MA-ZIF-8, respectively, all gets higher, and the $Q_{st}$ of N₂ turns lower than that of original ZIF-8 at meantime. As a consequence of that, the CO₂/N₂ selectivities of the amine@ZIF-8 all become higher in comparison with those of ZIF-8.

Figure 9

Dependence of isosteric heat of adsorption on the amounts adsorbed of CO₂ and N₂ over the amine@ZIF-8 materials: (a) CO₂; (b) N₂.

(b)

3.5. Cyclic Adsorption-Desorption Performances of CO₂ on MA-ZIF-8 Material

In order to assess the reusability of CO₂ on the modified ZIF-8, we further performed the CO₂ adsorption-desorption cycle test on MA-ZIF-8 material. Figure 10 presents the variation curves of CO₂ uptake on MA-ZIF-8 material during four continuous cycles of CO₂ volumetric adsorption and desorption experiments at 298 K. It can be seen that after four adsorption-desorption cycles, the CO₂ desorption efficiency was higher than 99%, and only about 0.01 wt% CO₂ remains on the adsorbent. This indicated that the adsorption of CO₂ on the MA-ZIF-8 sample was reversible, and the MA-ZIF-8 sample had good regeneration performance. In addition, the shapes of the four adsorption-desorption cycle curves were analogous, denoting that MA-ZIF-8 was very stable and suitable for CO₂ adsorption.

Figure 10

Volumetric recycle runs of CO₂ adsorption-desorption on the MA-ZIF-8 at 298 K and 1 bar for adsorption and 1 mbar for desorption.

Figure 11 presents the six gravimetric CO₂ adsorption-desorption cycles for MA-ZIF-8, where the desorption processes were evaluated at 125°C and 150°C, respectively. As it was noted, after each desorption process, an obvious decrease can be observed. Furthermore, when the desorption temperature increased from 125°C to 150°C, there was only a slight variation in the weight of MA-ZIF-8. For MMEN-ZIF-8 and ED-ZIF-8, similar phenomenon can be observed (see Figures S3 and S4). Therefore, the desorption temperature has little effect on the CO₂ capture during cycles. It also can be concluded that 125°C is enough for the regeneration of amine@ZIF-8 materials.

Figure 11

Six gravimetric CO₂ adsorption-desorption cycles on the MA-ZIF-8 at 298 K and desorption at 125°C and 150°C, respectively: (a) 125°C; (b) 150°C.

(b)

4. Conclusions

The as-synthesized ZIF-8 material was successfully modified with methylamine, ethylenediamine, and N, N $^{'}$ -dimethylethylenediamine by using a postsynthetic method to enhance its adsorption capacity and selectivity toward CO₂. The BET surface areas of MA-ZIF-8, ED-ZIF-8, and MMEN-ZIF-8 increased by 118.2%, 29.8%, and 90.2%, respectively, in comparison with ZIF-8. Moreover, the N-H groups were grafted into the surfaces of the amine-modified samples. In addition, the three amine@ZIF-8 materials (MA-ZIF-8, ED-ZIF-8, and MMEN-ZIF-8) all had higher CO₂ adsorption capacities in contrast to ZIF-8 samples, increasing by 110.5%, 49.4%, and 64.8%, respectively. This enhancement was mainly because of their larger surface areas and stronger interaction between CO₂ and the Lewis basic amine groups. The IAST theory was employed to predict the adsorption equilibrium and selectivity from the single-component isotherms. The amine@ZIF-8 materials all showed larger CO₂/N₂ selectivity than that of ZIF-8, particularly in the low-pressure region. Moreover, at 0.01, 0.5, and 1.0 bar, the selectivities of CO₂/N₂ on the MA-ZIF-8 were separately up to 31, 16, and 14, which is almost three times of that of ZIF-8. The $Q_{st}$ of CO₂ adsorption on the MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 all become higher, while, the $Q_{st}$ of N₂ on these samples was slightly lower as contrast to that on ZIF-8. Furthermore, six gravimetric CO₂ adsorption-desorption recycle runs on MA-ZIF-8, MMEN-ZIF-8, and ED-ZIF-8 indicated the good repeatability and feasibility of the modified ZIF-8 for CO₂ capture, highlighting the possibility of using MA-ZIF-8 for industrial CO₂ adsorption and separation.

Footnotes

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878122), the Pearl River S and T Nova Program of Guangzhou (201710010053), and the Zhengzhou Science and Technology Project (141PPTGG433).

Supplementary Materials

References

Hahn

M. B.

Riederer

A. M.

Foster

S. O.

The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study in Mozambique

Global Environmental Change 2009 19

3207986

1 74 88

Liu

Dong

Porous metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide adsorption and separation at low pressure

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2020 8

3207986

41 15378 15404

10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05155

Pedersen

J. S. T.

Santos

F. D.

van Vuuren

Gupta

Coelho

R. E.

Aparício

B. A.

Swart

An assessment of the performance of scenarios against historical global emissions for IPCC reports

Global Environmental Change 2021 66

3207986

102199

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102199

Zhang

Zhao

Jiang

Shao

How to achieve the 2030 CO₂ emission-reduction targets for China's industrial sector: retrospective decomposition and prospective trajectories

Global Environmental Change 2017 44

3207986

83 97

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.003

2-s2.0-85016558955

Darunte

L. A.

Walton

K. S.

Sholl

D. S.

Jones

C. W.

CO₂ capture via adsorption in amine-functionalized sorbents

Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2016 12

3207986

82 90

10.1016/j.coche.2016.03.002

2-s2.0-84962198261

Sun

Liu

Wang

Yang

Studies on photocatalytic CO₂ reduction over NH₂-Uio-66(Zr) and its derivatives: towards a better understanding of photocatalysis on metal-organic frameworks

Chemistry – A European Journal 2013 19

3207986

42 14279 14285

10.1002/chem.201301728

2-s2.0-84885586455

Jones

C. W.

CO₂ capture from dilute gases as a component of modern global carbon management

Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 2011 2

3207986

1 31 52

10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114252

2-s2.0-79953856561

Qin

Zhang

The advances of post-combustion CO₂ capture with chemical solvents: review and guidelines

Energy Procedia 2014 63

3207986

1339 1346

10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.143

2-s2.0-84922840364

Harja

Tataru-Farmus

Hultuana

Castro

C. G. .

Ciobanu

Lazar

Influence of ethylenediamine content over performance of CO₂ absorption into potassium carbonate solutions

Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 2021 20

3207986

4 507 516

10.30638/eemj.2021.050

10.

Ochedi

F. O.

Liu

Hussain

Carbon dioxide capture using liquid absorption methods: a review

Environmental Chemistry Letters 2021 19

3207986

1 77 109

10.1007/s10311-020-01093-8

11.

Shewchuk

S. R.

Mukherjee

Dalai

A. K.

Selective carbon-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture from mixed gas streams and catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ into renewable energy source: a review

Chemical Engineering Science 2021 243

3207986

116735

10.1016/j.ces.2021.116735

12.

Kwon

D.-i.

Kim

J.-C.

Lee

Engineering micropore walls of beta zeolites by post-functionalization for CO₂ adsorption performance screening under humid conditions

Chemical Engineering Journal 2022 427

3207986

131461

10.1016/j.cej.2021.131461

13.

Kumar

Madden

D. G.

Lusi

Chen

K. J.

Daniels

E. A.

Curtin

Perry

J. J.

IV Zaworotko

M. J.

Direct air capture of CO₂ by physisorbent materials

Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2015 54

3207986

48 14372 14377

10.1002/anie.201506952

2-s2.0-84954349285

26440308

14.

Shi

Xiao

Azarabadi

Song

Chen

Lackner

K. S.

Sorbents for the direct capture of CO₂ from ambient air

Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2020 59

3207986

18 6984 7006

10.1002/anie.201906756

31379037

15.

Chiang

Y.-C.

Huang

C.-C.

Chin

W.-T.

Carbon dioxide adsorption on carbon nanofibers with different porous structures

Applied Sciences 2021 11

3207986

16 7724

10.3390/app11167724

16.

Bahamon

Díaz-Márquez

Gamallo

Vega

L. F.

Energetic evaluation of swing adsorption processes for CO₂ capture in selected MOFs and zeolites: effect of impurities

Chemical Engineering Journal 2018 342

3207986

458 473

10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.094

2-s2.0-85042649782

17.

Jung

Y. G.

Nah

I. W.

Choi

U. S.

Designing large-sized and spherical CO₂ adsorbents for highly reversible CO₂ capture and low pressure drop

Chemical Engineering Journal 2022 427

3207986

131781

10.1016/j.cej.2021.131781

18.

Wang

Biswas

S. K.

Okubayashi

Polyethylenimine-impregnated mesoporous delignified wood with high mechanical strength for CO₂/N₂ selective adsorption

ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020 3

3207986

6 5499 5508

10.1021/acsanm.0c00799

19.

Healy

Patil

Wilson

Hermanspahn

Harvey-Reid

N. C.

Howard

B. I.

Kleinjan

Kolien

Payet

Telfer

S. G.

Kruger

P. E.

Bennett

T. D.

The thermal stability of metal-organic frameworks

Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2020 419

3207986

213388

10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213388

20.

Zhang

Nai

Lou

Metal-organic-framework-based materials as platforms for renewable energy and environmental applications

Joule 2017 1

3207986

1 77 107

10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.008

2-s2.0-85030163437

21.

Olajire

A. A.

Synthesis chemistry of metal-organic frameworks for CO₂ capture and conversion for sustainable energy future

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018 92

3207986

570 607

10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.073

2-s2.0-85046761040

22.

Banerjee

Phan

Wang

Knobler

Furukawa

O'Keeffe

Yaghi

O. M.

High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO₂ capture

Science 2008 319

3207986

5865 939 943

10.1126/science.1152516

2-s2.0-39349109812

18276887

23.

Ghanbari

Abnisa

Wan Daud

W. M. A.

A review on production of metal organic frameworks (MOF) for CO₂ adsorption

Science of the Total Environment 2020 707

3207986

135090

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135090

31863992

24.

Gascon

Corma

Kapteijn

Llabres i Xamena

F. X.

Metal organic framework catalysis: quo vadis?

ACS Catalysis 2014 4

3207986

2 361 378

10.1021/cs400959k

2-s2.0-84893835777

25.

Wen

H.-M.

Cui

Zhou

Qian

Chen

Emerging multifunctional metal–organic framework materials

Advanced Materials 2016 28

3207986

40 8819 8860

10.1002/adma.201601133

2-s2.0-84979555703

26.

Zhang

Chen

Recent progress in the design fabrication of metal-organic frameworks-based nanozymes and their applications to sensing and cancer therapy

Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2019 137

3207986

178 198

10.1016/j.bios.2019.04.061

2-s2.0-85065529219

31100598

27.

Wang

Zhou

Strong foam-like composites from highly mesoporous wood and metal-organic frameworks for efficient CO2Capture

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021 13

3207986

25 29949 29959

10.1021/acsami.1c06637

28.

Chong

Jawad

Tan

P. C.

Abed

The influence of blending different molecular weights of cellulose acetate butyrate for CO₂/N₂ separation

Journal of Physical Science 2020 31

3207986

2 91 112

10.21315/jps2020.31.2.7

29.

Abid

H. R.

Rada

Z. H.

Liu

Wang

Liu

Striking CO₂ capture and CO₂/N₂ separation by Mn/Al bimetallic MIL-53

Polyhedron 2021 193

3207986

114898

10.1016/j.poly.2020.114898

30.

Liu

J.-M.

Hou

J.-X.

Liu

Jing

L. J.

J. L.

Pyrazinyl-functionalized Zr(IV)-MOF for ultrasensitive detection of tyrosine/TNP and efficient CO₂/N₂separation

Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2019 7

3207986

38 11851 11857

10.1039/C9TC03096D

2-s2.0-85073331958

31.

Yang

Zhang

Megharaj

Chen

Postcombustion capture of CO₂ by diamines containing one primary and one tertiary amino group: reaction rate and mechanism

Energy & Fuels 2019 33

3207986

8 7500 7508

10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00961

2-s2.0-85070604807

32.

Wang

Shah

B. B.

Zhao

CO2Capture in Metal-Organic Framework Adsorbents: An Engineering Perspective

Advanced Sustainable Systems 2019 3

3207986

10.1002/adsu.201800080

33.

Ding

Flaig

Jiang

H.-L.

Yaghi

Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials

Chemical Society reviews 2019 48

3207986

10 2783 2828

10.1039/C8CS00829A

2-s2.0-85065969133

31032507

34.

Oliveira

L. T.

Gonçalves

R. V.

Gonçalves

D. V.

de Azevedo

D. C. S.

Pereira de Lucena

S. M.

Superior performance of mesoporous MOF MIL-100 (Fe) impregnated with ionic liquids for CO₂ adsorption

Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 2019 64

3207986

5 2221 2228

10.1021/acs.jced.8b01177

2-s2.0-85064164131

35.

T. K.

P. V.

Nguyen

V. C.

Kim

Construction of OH sites within MIL-101 (Cr)-NH2 framework for enhanced CO₂ adsorption and CO₂/N₂ selectivity

Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 2021 38

3207986

8 1676 1685

10.1007/s11814-021-0799-z

36.

Zeeshan

Gulbalkan

Haşlak

Keskin

Uzun

Doubling CO₂/N₂ separation performance of CuBTC by incorporation of 1- n -ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethyl phosphate

Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2021 316

3207986

110947

10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110947

37.

Younas

Rezakazemi

Daud

Wazir

M. B.

Ahmad

Ullah

Inamuddin Ramakrishna

Recent progress and remaining challenges in post-combustion CO₂ capture using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)

Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2020 80

3207986

100849

10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100849

38.

Kazemi

Safarifard

Carbon dioxide capture in MOFs: the effect of ligand functionalization

Polyhedron 2018 154

3207986

236 251

10.1016/j.poly.2018.07.042

2-s2.0-85051371368

39.

Gao

X.-J.

Zheng

H.-G.

The difference in the CO₂ adsorption capacities of different functionalized pillar-layered metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)

Dalton Transactions 2021 50

3207986

26 9310 9316

10.1039/D1DT00498K

34132290

40.

Chen

D.-R.

Wang

W.-N.

Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) synthesized using the spray method for tunable CO₂ adsorption

Chemical Engineering Journal 2020 382

3207986

122825

10.1016/j.cej.2019.122825

41.

Chang

Huang

Feng

W. W.

Zhong

Madden

D. G.

Zaworotko

M. J.

X. H.

Specific K+Binding sites as CO2Traps in a porous MOF for enhanced CO2Selective sorption

Small 2019 15

3207986

22 1900426

10.1002/smll.201900426

2-s2.0-85064520589

42.

Zhu

Jie

B.-G.

Polyethyleneimine-modified UiO-66-NH₂(Zr) metal–organic frameworks: preparation and enhanced CO₂ selective adsorption

ACS Omega 2019 4

3207986

2 3188 3197

10.1021/acsomega.8b02319

2-s2.0-85061655844

31459536

43.

Babar

Mubashir

Mukhtar

Saqib

Ullah

Bustam

M. A.

Show

P. L.

Sustainable functionalized metal-organic framework NH₂-MIL-101(Al) for CO₂ separation under cryogenic conditions

Environmental Pollution 2021 279

3207986

116924

10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116924

33751951

44.

Zhang

Y.-J.

Nie

H.-X.

M.-H.

Chang

Post-synthetic modification of tetrazine functionalized porous MOF for CO₂ sorption performances modulation

Journal of Solid State Chemistry 2021 300

3207986

122257

10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122257

45.

Zhang

Xian

Xia

Wang

Enhancement of CO₂ adsorption and CO₂/N₂ selectivity on ZIF-8 via postsynthetic modification

AICHE Journal 2013 59

3207986

6 2195 2206

10.1002/aic.13970

2-s2.0-84878136413

46.

Lim

Lee

Seong

Jeong

Kim

Baek

S. B.

Lah

M. S.

Amine-tagged fragmented ligand installation for covalent modification of MOF-74

Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021 60

3207986

17 9296 9300

10.1002/anie.202100456

33666323

47.

Rada

Z. H.

Abid

H. R.

Shang

Webley

Liu

Sun

Wang

Effects of amino functionality on uptake of CO₂, CH₄ and selectivity of CO₂/CH₄ on titanium based MOFs

Fuel 2015 160

3207986

318 327

10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.088

2-s2.0-84938891307

48.

Qiao

Wang

Jiang

Zhou

Design of amine-functionalized metal–organic frameworks for CO₂ separation: the more amine, the better?

Chemical Communications 2016 52

3207986

5 974 977

10.1039/C5CC07171B

2-s2.0-84954090741

26588178

49.

Justin

Espín

Kochetygov

Asgari

Trukhina

Queen

W. L.

A two step postsynthetic modification strategy: appending short chain polyamines to Zn-NH2-BDC MOF for enhanced CO₂ adsorption

Inorganic Chemistry 2021 60

3207986

16 11720 11729

10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01216

34264652

50.

Xia

Hong

Geng

Zhou

Zhang

Amine-functionalized ZIF-8 as a fluorescent probe for breath volatile organic compound biomarker detection of lung cancer patients

ACS Omega 2020 5

3207986

7 3478 3486

10.1021/acsomega.9b03793

32118162

51.

Zhang

Xian

Wang

Improvement of CO₂ adsorption on ZIF-8 crystals modified by enhancing basicity of surface

Chemical Engineering Science 2011 66

3207986

20 4878 4888

10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.051

2-s2.0-80051680309

52.

García-Díez

Schaefer

Sanchez-Sanchez

Celzard

Fierro

Maroto-Valer

M. M.

García

Novel porous carbons derived from coal tar rejects: assessment of the role of pore texture in CO₂ capture under realistic postcombustion operating temperatures

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019 11

3207986

40 36789 36799

10.1021/acsami.9b13247

2-s2.0-85072958960

31525014

53.

García-Díez

Castro-Muñiz

Paredes

J. I.

Maroto-Valer

M. M.

Suárez-García

García

CO₂ capture by novel hierarchical activated ordered micro-mesoporous carbons derived from low value coal tar products

Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2021 318

3207986

110986

10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110986

54.

Park

K. S.

Côté

A. P.

Choi

J. Y.

Huang

Uribe-Romo

F. J.

Chae

H. K.

O’Keeffe

Yaghi

O. M.

Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006 103

3207986

27 10186 10191

10.1073/pnas.0602439103

2-s2.0-33745900775

16798880

55.

Burrows

A. D.

Cadman

L. K.

Gee

W. J.

Hamzah

H. A.

Knichal

J. V.

Rochat

Carcia

Navalón

Tuning the Properties of Metal-Organic Frameworks by Post-synthetic Modification

Metal-Organic Frameworks-Applications in Separations and Catalysis 2018

Wiley-VCH

56.

L.-J.

Liao

P.-Q.

C.-T.

Wei

Y. S.

Zhou

H. L.

Lin

J. M.

X. Y.

Zhang

J. P.

Grafting alkylamine in UiO-66 by charge-assisted coordination bonds for carbon dioxide capture from high-humidity flue gas

Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2015 3

3207986

43 21849 21855

10.1039/C5TA05997F

2-s2.0-84946087914

57.

Czepirski

JagieŁŁo

Virial-type thermal equation of gas--solid adsorption

Chemical Engineering Science 1989 44

3207986

4 797 801

10.1016/0009-2509(89)85253-4

2-s2.0-0024922598

58.

Britt

Furukawa

Wang

Glover

T. G.

Yaghi

O. M.

Highly efficient separation of carbon dioxide by a metal-organic framework replete with open metal sites

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009 106

3207986

49 20637 20640

10.1073/pnas.0909718106

2-s2.0-73949125283

19948967

Enhanced CO 2 Adsorption and Selectivity of CO 2 /N 2 on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Synthesis and Modification

2.3. Characterization

2.4. CO2 and N2 Adsorption Isotherms at Ambient Temperature

2.5. Reusability Assessment

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

3.2. CO2 and N2 Adsorption on Amine@ZIF-8 at Ambient Temperature

3.2.1. CO2 Adsorption Isotherms on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

3.2.2. N2 Adsorption Isotherms on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

3.3. Adsorption Selectivity of CO2 vs. N2 on Amine@ZIF-8 at Ambient Temperature

3.4. Isosteric Heat of Adsorption

3.5. Cyclic Adsorption-Desorption Performances of CO2 on MA-ZIF-8 Material

4. Conclusions

Footnotes

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Acknowledgments

Supplementary Materials

References

2.4. CO₂ and N₂ Adsorption Isotherms at Ambient Temperature

3.2. CO₂ and N₂ Adsorption on Amine@ZIF-8 at Ambient Temperature

3.2.1. CO₂ Adsorption Isotherms on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

3.2.2. N₂ Adsorption Isotherms on Amine@ZIF-8 Materials

3.3. Adsorption Selectivity of CO₂ vs. N₂ on Amine@ZIF-8 at Ambient Temperature

3.5. Cyclic Adsorption-Desorption Performances of CO₂ on MA-ZIF-8 Material