Transnasal swab testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 is well established. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advocates swabbing either of the anterior nares, middle turbinate, or nasopharynx for specimen collection depending on available local resources. The purpose of this review is to investigate complications related to transnasal SARS-CoV-2 testing with specific attention to specimen collection site and swab approach. The literature demonstrates that while nasopharyngeal swabbing is associated with an increased risk of complications, it should remain the gold-standard test due to greater diagnostic accuracy relative to anterior nasal and middle turbinate swabs.
LiuR, HanH, LiuF, . Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020. Clin Chim Acta2020;505:172–5.doi:10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.009http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32156607
2.
BwireGM, MajigoMV, NjiroBJ, . Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol2021;93:719–25.doi:10.1002/jmv.26349http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706393
3.
LeeRA, HerigonJC, BenedettiA, . Performance of saliva, oropharyngeal swabs, and nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol2021;59. doi:doi:10.1128/JCM.02881-20. [Epub ahead of print: 20 Apr 2021].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504593
4.
GuptaK, BellinoPM, CharnessME. Adverse effects of nasopharyngeal swabs: three-dimensional printed versus commercial swabs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol;42:641–2.doi:10.1017/ice.2020.297
5.
FabbrisC, CestaroW, MenegaldoA, . Is oro/nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 detection a safe procedure? complications observed among a case series of 4876 consecutive swabs. Am J Otolaryngol2021;42:102758. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102758http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33125901
6.
PagellaF, LizzioR, UgoliniS, . Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in HHT patients: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal swab. Orphanet J Rare Dis2020;15:350. doi:10.1186/s13023-020-01628-whttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33339521
MughalZ, LuffE, OkonkwoO. Test, test, test – a complication of testing for coronavirus disease 2019 with nasal swabs. J Laryngol Otol2020:1–4.doi:10.1017/S0022215120001425
9.
AzarA, WessellDE, JanusJR, . Fractured aluminum nasopharyngeal swab during drive-through testing for COVID-19: radiographic detection of a retained foreign body. Skeletal Radiol2020;49:1873–7.doi:10.1007/s00256-020-03582-xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32827082
10.
GaffuriM, CapaccioP, TorrettaS, . An unusual retained choanal foreign body: a possible complication of COVID-19 testing with nasopharyngeal swab. Ear Nose Throat J2021:145561321993933. doi:10.1177/0145561321993933http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634718
11.
MedasR, CoelhoR, MacedoG. An unusual collateral damage of COVID-19 pandemic. Gastrointest Endosc2020;92:1261–2.doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.017http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32553571
12.
SullivanCB, SchwaljeAT, JensenM, . Cerebrospinal fluid leak after nasal swab testing for coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2020;146:1179. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3579http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33022069
13.
Alberola-AmoresFJ, Valdeolivas-UrbelzE, Torregrosa-OrtizM, . Meningitis due to cerebrospinal fluid leak after nasal swab testing for COVID-19. Eur J Neurol2021. doi:doi:10.1111/ene.14736. [Epub ahead of print: 21 Jan 2021].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480112
14.
RajahJ, LeeJ. CSF rhinorrhoea post COVID-19 swab: a case report and review of literature. J Clin Neurosci2021;86:6–9.doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2021.01.003http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33775348
15.
HigginsTS, WuAW, TingJY. SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab Testing-False-Negative results from a pervasive anatomical misconception. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2020;146:993. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2946http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32940647
16.
KucikCJ, ClenneyTL. Management of epistaxis. AFP2005;71:305–11.
17.
SchlosserRJ. Epistaxis. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed2009;360:784–9.doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0807078
FishT, IssaK, LevineCG, . Assessment of available online information about nasopharyngeal swab testing in patient Instructions for sinus and pituitary surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2021;147:572. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5663http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33662126
21.
TorrettaS, ZuccottiG, CristofaroV, . Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR using different sample sources: review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J2021;100:131S–8.doi:10.1177/0145561320953231http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32865458
22.
LiL, ShimT, ZapantaPE. Optimization of COVID-19 testing accuracy with nasal anatomy education. Am J Otolaryngol2021;42:102777. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102777http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33125907
23.
AsselahT, DurantelD, PasmantE, . COVID-19: discovery, diagnostics and drug development. J Hepatol2021;74:168–84.doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.031http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038433
Butler-LaporteG, LawandiA, SchillerI, . Comparison of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab nucleic acid amplification testing for detection of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med2021;181:353. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8876http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33449069
