This study investigated the barriers to participation with outdoor programs for women and people of color, who traditionally participate in outdoor recreation at disproportionately low levels. The study begins with a synopsis of research on outdoor recreation constraints for women and people of color. A survey of students (n = 318) at a midsized public university in the Southeast provided data on differences of perceptions of constraints. Women were found to be significantly more affected by socialization/subculture barriers and economic/access barriers than men. Focus groups with women and people of color further suggest that both women and people of color are influenced by socialization/subculture barriers and economic/access barriers and that discrimination plays a role in reduced participation by students of color. Suggestions are made for ways outdoor programs may attempt to mitigate these barriers for underrepresented groups.
BialeschkiM.D. (1992). We said, “why not?” A historical perspective on women's outdoor pursuits. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 63(2), 52–55.
2.
BialeschkiM.D. (2005). Fear of violence: Contested constraints by women in outdoor recreation activities. In JacksonE. L. (Ed.), Constraints to leisure (pp. 104–114). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
3.
BurnsR.C., & GraefeA.R. (2007). Constraints to outdoor recreation: Exploring the effects of disabilities on perceptions and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 156–181.
4.
CarrD.S., & WilliamsD.R. (1993). Understanding the role of ethnicity in outdoor recreation experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(1), 22.
5.
CederquistJ., NegleyS., & BellS. (2006). Gender, ability, and ethnicity: Promoting inclusiveness in outdoor recreation programming. Association of Outdoor Recreation & Education Conference Proceedings, 15–21.
6.
ChangM.J. (2001). Is it more than about getting along? The broader educational relevance of reducing students' racial biases. Journal of College Student Development, 42(2), 93–105.
7.
ChangM. J., DensonN., SaenzV., MisaK. & California University. (2005). The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interaction among undergraduates. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.2.05: Online Submission.
8.
ChavezD.J. (1993). Visitor perceptions of crowing and discrimination at two national forests in southern California.Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: L. Earlbaum Associates.
10.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. (2006). CAS professional standards for higher education (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
11.
EwertA., PlaceG., & SibthorpJ.I.M. (2005). Early-life outdoor experiences and an individual's environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27(3), 225–239.
12.
FloydM.F., GramannJ.H., & SaenzR. (1993). Ethnic factors and the use of public outdoor recreation areas: The case of Mexican Americans. Leisure Sciences, 15(2), 83–98.
13.
FloydM.F., & NoeF.P. (1993). Understanding intra-ethnic environmental attitude variations: Cuban origin population viewsManaging Urban and High-Density Recreation Settings (Vol. NC-163, pp. 119–121): USDA Forest Service General Technical Report.
14.
FloydM.F., ShinewK.J., McGuireF.A., & NoeF.P. (1994). Race, class and leisure activity preferences: Marginality and ethnicity revisited. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(2), 158–173.
15.
GarstB., ScheiderI., & BakerD. (2001). Outdoor adventure program participation impacts on adolescent self-perception. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 41–49.
16.
GassM.A., GarveyD.E., & SugermanD.A. (2003). The long-term effects of a first-year student wilderness orientation program. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 34–40.
17.
GobsterP.H., & DelgadoA. (1993). Ethnicity and recreation use in Chicago's Lincoln Park: In-park user survey findingsManaging Urban and High-Density Recreation Settings (Vol. NC-163, pp. 74–81): USDA Forest Service General Technical Report.
18.
HendersonK. (1996). Feminist perspectives on outdoor leadership. Retrieved from ERIC database.
19.
HendersonK. A., WinnS., & RobertsN. S. (1996). “Kind of in the middle”: The gendered meanings of the outdoors for women students. Retrieved from ERIC database.
20.
HospodarskyD., & LeeM. (1995). Ethnic use of the Tonto: Geographic extension of the recreation knowledge base.Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
21.
HutchisonR. (1987). Ethnicity and urban recreation: Whites, blacks, and Hispanics in Chicago's public parks. Journal of Leisure Research, 19(3), 205–222.
22.
HutchisonR., & FidelK. (1984). Mexican-American recreation activities: A reply to McMillen. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(4), 344–349.
23.
JayakumarU.M. (2008). Can higher education meet the needs of an increasingly diverse and global society? Campus diversity and cross-cultural workforce competencies. Harvard Educational Review, 78(4), 615–651.
24.
JohnsonC. Y., BowkerJ. M., EnglishD. B. K., & WorthenD. (1998). Wildland recreation on the rural South: An examination of marginality and ethnicity theory. Journal of Leisure Research, v30(n1), p 101(120).
25.
JordanD.J. (1992). Effective leadership for girls and women in outdoor recreation. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 63(2), 61–64.
26.
LeeJ.H., ScottD., & FloydM.F. (2001). Structural inequalities in outdoor recreation participation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(4), 23.
27.
LeverJ. (1978). Sex differences in the complexity of children's play and games. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 471–483.
28.
LittleD.E. (2002). Women and adventure recreation: Reconstructing leisure constraints and adventure experiences to negotiate continuing participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 157–177.
29.
LloydK., & LittleD.E. (2005). “Quality of life, aren't we always searching for that?”: How women can achieve enhanced quality of life through participation in outdoor adventure recreation. Leisure/Loisir. Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies, 29(2), 147–181.
30.
LuoJ., & Jamieson-DrakeD. (2009). A retrospective assessment of the educational benefits of interaction across racial boundaries. Journal of College Student Development, 50(1), 67–86.
31.
ManningR.E. (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (2nd ed.). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
32.
MittenD. (1992). Empowering girls and women in the outdoors. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 63(2), 56–60.
33.
Noonan IrwinP., GartnerW.C., & PhelpsC.C. (1990). Mexican-American/Anglo cultural differences as recreation style determinants. Leisure Sciences, 12(4), 335–348.
PropstD.B., & KoeslerR.A. (1998). Bandura goes outdoors: role of self efficacy in the outdoor leadership development process. Leisure Sciences, 20(4), 319–344.
37.
RandallS.R., TerryR.B., & JeffreyD.K. (2009). Macro-linkages between health and outdoor recreation: The role of parks and recreation providers. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 27(3), 8–20.
38.
RaymoreL. A., GodbeyG. C., & CrawfordD. W. (1994). Self-esteem, gender, and socioeconomic status: Their relation to perceptions of constraint on leisure among adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, v 26(n2), p 99(20).
39.
RobertsN.S., & DroginE.B. (1993). The outdoor recreation experience: Factors affecting participation of African American women. Journal of Experiential Education, 16(1), 14–18.
40.
RobertsN. (1996). Women of color in experiential education: Crossing cultural boundaries. Retrieved from ERIC database.
41.
ShawS.M. (1994). Gender, leisure, and constraint: Towards a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 8–22.
42.
TaylorW., GilbertJ., KaufmanT., & MorganL. (2003). Ranking outdoor recreation facilities on campus: Participant benefits and preferences. Association of Outdoor Recreation & Education Conference Proceedings, 67–74.
43.
TierneyP. T., & DahlR. (1998). Who is least likely to visit natural areas and participate in outdoor experiential education programs; What are the barriers; and how can barriers be broken? Retrieved from ERIC database.
44.
WashburneR.F. (1978). Black under-participation in wildland recreation: Alternative explanations. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(2), 175–189.
45.
WashburneR.F. (1980). Black-white ethnic differences in outdoor recreation: USDA Forest Service Research Paper.
46.
WestP.C. (1989). Urban region parks and black minorities: Subculture, marginality, and interracial relations in park use in the Detroit metropolitan area. Leisure Sciences, 11(1), 11–28.
47.
WoodardM.D. (1988). Class, regionality, and leisure among urban Black Americans: The post-civil rights era. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(2), 87–105.
48.
ZosulsK.M., RubleD.N., Tamis-LeMondaC.S., ShroutP.E., BornsteinM.H., & GreulichF.K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 688–701.
