This study contributes to the limited knowledge on university recreation and student affairs part-time student employment programs, and how this experience can promote student development. The research examines differences in socialization opportunities perceived by student employees of a campus recreation department. Socialization was measured using group cohesion (a measure of the individual's attachment to the group). Analysis determined that African American student employees perceived a significantly lower overall level of cohesion compared with Caucasian and Hispanic student employees. In addition, students working in program areas that required less interdependence and limited ongoing training perceived significantly lower levels of cohesion compared with student employees working in positions that required regular in-service training and job-task interdependence. The authors discuss implications of the findings, recommendations for student development professionals, and suggestions for future research.
AhronsonA., & CameronJ.E. (2007). The nature of consequences of group cohesion in a military sample. Military Psychology, 19(1), 9–25.
2.
AppletonJ. R., BriggsC. M., & RhatiganJ. J. (1978). Pieces of eight: The rites, roles, and styles of the dean by eight who have been there. NASPA Institute of Research and Development, Portland, OR.
3.
AstinA. (1977). Four critical years: Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BowerG.G., HumsM.A., & KeedyJ.L. (2005). Factors influencing the willingness to mentor students within campus recreation. Recreational Sports Journal, 29(1), 59–77.
5.
CarlessS.A., & DePaolaC. (2000). The measurement of cohesive in work teams. Small Group Research, 31(1), 71–88.
6.
CarronA.V., & BrawleyL.R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106.
7.
ChickeringA. (1969). Education and identity.San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
8.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. (2006). CAS professional standards for higher education (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
9.
ForresterW.R., & TashchianA. (2006). Modeling the relationship between cohesion and performance in student work groups. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 458–464.
10.
GellinA. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991-2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746–762.
11.
HackettM.W. (2007). Exploring the relationship between recreational sports employment and academic success. Recreational Sports Journal, 31(1), 69–74.
12.
HarrisonD.A., PriceK.H., & BellM.P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107.
13.
JordanJ.S., TurnerB.A., & DuBordR.R. (2007). Organizational justice as a predictor of job satisfaction: An examination of university recreation department student employees. International Journal of Sport Management, 8(1), 32–54.
14.
LangfredC.W. (1998). Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword. Small Group Research, 29(1), 124–133.
15.
ManD.C., & LamS.S.K. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 979–1001.
16.
MoiseyenkoO. (2005). Education and social cohesion: Higher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(4), 89–104.
17.
National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA). (2004). The value of recreational sports in higher education: Impact on student enrollment, success, and buying power.Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.
18.
National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA). (2006). 2006-2011 Collegiate recreational sports facility construction report.Corvallis, OR: NIRSA.
19.
PackS.M., JordanJ.S., TurnerB.A., & HainesD. (2007). Perceived organizational support and employee satisfaction and retention. Recreational Sports Journal, 31(2), 95–106.
20.
PascarellaE.T., & TerenziniP.T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
PillaiR., & WilliamsE.A. (2004). Transformational leadership, self-efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 144–159.
22.
RiggertS.C., BoyleM., PetroskoJ.M., AshD., & Rude-ParkinsC. (2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 63–92.
23.
SandersK., & NautaA. (2004). Social cohesiveness and absenteeism: The relationship between characteristics of employees and short-term absenteeism within an organization. Small Group Research, 35(6), 724–741.
24.
SeashoreS.E. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group.Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
25.
SteinhardtM.A., DolbierC.L., GottliebN.H., & McCalisterK.T. (2003). The relationship between hardiness, supervisor support, group cohesion, and job stress as predictors of job satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(6), 382–389.
26.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
TurnerB.A., JordanJ.S., & DuBordR.R. (2005). Retaining student workers: The importance of organizational commitment. Recreational Sports Journal, 29(2), 117–126.
28.
WechB.A., MossholderK.W., SteelR.P., & BennettN. (1998). Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals'. Small Group Research, 29(4), 472–494.
29.
WellenJ.M., & NealeM. (2006). Deviance, self-typicality, and group cohesion: The corrosive effects of the bad apples on the barrel. Small Group Research, 37(2), 165–186.
30.
Wolf-WendelL.E., & RuelM. (1999). Developing the whole student: The collegiate ideal. New Directions for Higher Education, 105, 35–46.
