EndrewF.v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1 (2017).
3.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (2015). Rethinking service delivery for students with significant learning problems: Developing and implementing intensive instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 36(2), 105–111.
4.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (2017). Critique of the national evaluation of response to intervention: A case for simpler frameworks. Exceptional Children, 83, 255–268.
5.
FuchsD., MinowitzH. C., & GilbertJ. K. (2017). Policies and principles of inclusion. Presented at a conference, Using Educational Research and Innovation to Address Inequality and Achievement Gaps in Education, sponsored by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and Institute for Education Sciences. Washington, DC.
6.
GilmourA. F., FuchsD., & WehbyJ. H. (2018). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta–analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Submitted.
7.
KavaleK. A., FuchsD., & ScruggsT. E. (1994). Setting the record straight on learning disabilities and low achievement: Implications for the policymakers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9(2), 70–77.
8.
McMasterK. L., & FuchsD. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of students with learning disabilities: An update of Tateyama–Snizek's review. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 107–117.
9.
SchillerE., SanfordC., & BlackorbyJ. (2008). A national profile of the classroom experiences and academic performance of students with LD: A special topic report from the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at http://www.seels.net/info_reports/national_profile_students_learning_disabilities.htm
10.
StevensR. J., MaddenN. A., SlavinR. E, & FarnishA.M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 433–454.
11.
WagnerM., NewmanL., CametoR., LevineP., & MarderC. (2003). Going to School: Instructional Contexts, Programs, and Participation of Secondary School Students with Disabilities. A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at https://doi.org/www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_12/nlts2_report_2003_12_complete.pdf.
12.
WangM. C., & BirchJ. W. (1984). Effective special education in regular classes. Exceptional Children, 50(5), 391–398.
13.
YsseldykeJ. E., AlgozzineB., ShinnM. R., & McGueM. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 73–85.