Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2014-8
Essential Components of Special Education for English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities: Position Statement of the Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children
AugustD., & ShanahanT. (2006). Developing literacy in second–language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language–minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
FrancisD., RiveraM., LesauxN., KiefferM., & RiveraH. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of ELLs: Research–based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
3.
GarciaS., & TylerB. (2010). Meeting the needs of ELLs with LD in the general curriculum. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 113–120.
GeneseeF., Lindholm–LearyK. J., SaundersW., & ChristianD. (2006). Educating English language learners. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
GerstenR., & BakerS. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English–language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454–470.
7.
GoldenbergC. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does— and does not—say. American Educator, 32(2), 8–23 & 42–44.
8.
HarryE., & KlingnerJ. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education?Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
HerreraS., PerezD., & EscamillaK. (2010). Teaching reading to English language learners: Differentiated literacies. Boston, MA: Pearson.
KeaC. D., & TrentS. C. (2013). Providing culturally responsive teaching in field–based and student teaching experience: A case study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(2) 82–101.
12.
KlingnerJ. (2012) Distinguishing between learning disabilities and language acquisition. Power Point Slides. Council for Exceptional Children Webinar. Webinar%20Klinger%20ELL/lib/playback.html
13.
Ladson–BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
14.
Ladson–BillingsG. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
15.
López–ReynaN. (1996). The importance of meaningful contests in bilingual special education: Moving to whole language. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11(2), 120–131.
16.
LucasT., VillegasA. M., & Freedson–GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
17.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
18.
MurryK. (2012). Cognitive development, global learning, and academic progress: Promoting teacher readiness for CLD students and families. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 6(1) 11–24.
19.
NietoS. (2003). What keeps teachers going? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
OrtizA. (2001). ELLs with special needs: Effective instructional strategies. Retrieved from ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ED 469207).
21.
OrtizA., & ArtilesA. (2010). Meeting the needs of ELLs with disabilities: A linguistically and culturally responsive model. In GuofangL. & EdwardsP. A. (Eds.), Best practices in ELL instruction (pp. 247–272). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
22.
RodriguezD., RinglerM., O'NealD., & BunnK. (2009). Academic factors indicating successful programs for English language learners. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4) 512–525.
23.
RodriguezD., CarrasquilloA., & LeeK. S. (2014). The bilingual advantage: Promoting academic development, biliteracy, and native language in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
24.
SnowC. E., LawrenceJ. F., & WhiteC. (2009). Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 325–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345740903167042
VaughnS., MathesP., Linan–ThompsonS., & FrancisD. J. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 58–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–5826.2005.00121.x
27.
VaughnS., CirinoP. T., Linan–ThompsonS., MathesP. G., CarlsonC. D., HaganE. C., et al. (2006). Effectiveness of a Spanish intervention and an English intervention for English language learners at risk for reading problems. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 449–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003449
28.
VaughnS., MathesP., Linan–ThompsonS., CirinoP., CarlsonC., Pollard–DurodolaS. D., Cárdenas–HaganE., & FrancisD. J. (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first–grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 153–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/510653
29.
VaughnS., DentonC. A., & FletcherJ.M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5) 423–444.
30.
ZehlerA., FleischmanH., HopstockP., StephensonT., PendzickM., & SapruS. (2003). Policy report: Summary of findings related to LEP and SPED–LEP students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement of Limited English Proficient Students.