AdamsA., & ChiversS. (2017). There's no place like home: Designing for long–term residential care in Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies, 50(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.50.2.273
2.
AdamsA., TheodoreD., GoldenbergE., McLarenC., & McKeeverP. (2010). Kids in the atrium: Comparing architectural intentions and children's experiences in a pediatric hospital lobby. Social Science & Medicine, 70(5), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.049
3.
AdamsP. C. (2017). Place and extended agency. In EnfieldN. J. & KockelmanP. (Eds.), Distributed agency: The sharing of intention, cause, and accountability (pp. 213–220). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457204.003.0022
4.
AndrewsG. J., ChenS., & MyersS. (2014). The “taking place” of health and wellbeing: Towards non–representational theory. Social Science & Medicine, 108, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.037
5.
BirchJ., CurtisP., & JamesA. (2007). Sense and sensibilities: In search of the child–friendly hospital. Built Environment, 33(4), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.33.4.405
6.
BochnerA. P. (2018). Unfurling rigor: On continuity and change in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(6), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727766
7.
BoonB., RozendaalM., Van den Heuvel–EibrinkM. M., van der NetJ., & StappersP. J. (2016). Playscapes: A design perspective on young children's physical play. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 181–189), Manchester, United Kingdom. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930713.
8.
BuseC., MartinD., & NettletonS. (2018). Conceptualising ‘materialities of care’: Making visible mundane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12663
9.
CarrollP., WittenK., & StewartC. (2017). Children are citizens too: Consulting with children on the redevelopment of a central city square in Auckland, Aotearoa/New Zealand. Built Environment, 43(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.43.2.272
10.
CipollaC. (2018). Designing for vulnerability: Interpersonal relations and design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.03.001
11.
DasV. (2015). Affliction: Health, disease, poverty. Fordham University Press.
12.
DuqueM., PinkS., SumartojoS., & VaughanL. (2019). Homeliness in health care: The role of everyday designing. Home Cultures, 16(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2020.1757381
13.
GaminiesfahaniH., LozanovskaM., & TuckerR. (2020). A scoping review of the impact on children of the built environment design characteristics of healing spaces. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(4), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720903845
14.
GilsonE. (2011). Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression. Hypatia, 26(2), 308–332.
15.
GrazianoV., & TrogalK. (2017). The politics of collective repair: Examining object–relations in a postwork society. Cultural Studies, 31(5), 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1298638
16.
HackettA., ProcterL., & SeymourJ. (2015). Introduction: Spatial perspectives and childhood studies. In Children's spatialities: Embodiment, emotion and agency (pp. 1–17). Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
JelićA., MartinM., LaursenL. H., TvedebrinkT. D. O., FichL. B., & OehlweinL. I. (2020). Children, play, and the built environment: What can we learn from co–creation and embodied cognitive science (Report 3)? CoC Playful Minds Research Journals. Billund, Denmark. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11436.28803.
18.
JiangS. (2020). Positive distractions and play in the public spaces of pediatric healthcare environments: A literature review. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(3), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720901707
19.
KearnsR. A., & BarnettJ. R. (2000). “Happy Meals” in the Starship Enterprise: Interpreting a moral geography of health care consumption. Health & Place, 6(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-8292(00)00005-8
20.
KozlovskyR. (2020). Programming emotional care: The Nuffield Study of the children's hospital, 1963. Childhood in the Past, 13(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17585716.2020.1791497
21.
KraftlP., HortonJ., & TuckerF. (2007). Children, young people and built environments. Built Environment, 33(4), 399–404.
22.
KullmanK. (2014). Children, urban care, and everyday pavements. Environment and Planning A, 46(12), 2864–2880. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46260
LorenziniD. (2018). Stanley Cavell, 1926–2018. Radical Philosophy, 2(3), 122–126.
25.
LoxleyA., O'LearyB., & MintonS. J. (2011). Space makers or space cadets exploring children's perceptions of space and place in the context of a Dublin primary school. Educational and Child Psychology, 28(01), 46–63.
26.
MalininL. H., & ParnellR. (2012). Reconceptualizing school design: Learning environments for children and youth. Children Youth and Environments, 22(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.22.1.0011
27.
MooreK. D., & GeboyL. (2010). The question of evidence: Current worldviews in environmental design research and practice. Arq. Architectural Research Quarterly, 14(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135510000722
28.
MoralesA. M. A. (2021). A social approach to the effects of childhood cancer: A review of relevant social contexts. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 10(2), 39–46.
PetherbridgeD. (2016). What's critical about vulnerability? Rethinking interdependence, recognition, and power. Hypatia, 31(3), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12250
31.
PinkS., SalazarJ. F., & DuqueM. (2019). Everyday mundane repair: Banknotes and the material entanglements of improvisation and innovation. Tapuya: Latin American. Science, Technology and Society, 2(1), 458–477. /10.1080/25729861.2019.1636619
32.
PitsikaliA., ParnellR., & McIntyreL. (2020). The public value of child–friendly space. Archnet–IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-07-2019-0164
33.
RamaekersS., & SuissaJ. (2012). The claims of parenting: Reasons, responsibility and society. Springer.
34.
RashidM. (2013). The question of knowledge in evidence–based design for healthcare facilities: Limitations and suggestions. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(4), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671300600407
StamL., VerbeekP. P., & HeylighenA. (2020). Between specificity and openness: How architects deal with design–use complexities. Design Studies, 66, 54–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.010
38.
SumartojoS., PinkS., DuqueM., & VaughanL. (2020). Atmospheres of care in a psychiatric inpatient unit. Design for Health, 4(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2020.1730068
39.
TutenelP. (2021). Room for vulnerability: Children's everyday practices and the design of cancer care environments [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. KU Leuven.
40.
TutenelP., & HeylighenA. (2021). Interweaving vulnerability and everyday design: Encounters around an aquarium in a paediatric oncology ward. Design Studies, 73, Article 101004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101004
41.
TutenelP., RamaekersS., & HeylighenA. (2019a). Conversations between procedural and situated ethics: Learning from video research with children in a cancer care ward. The Design Journal, 22(sup1), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595444
42.
TutenelP., RamaekersS., & HeylighenA. (2019b). Understanding children's spatiality in cancer care environments: Untangling everyday practices around an IV–stand in a paediatric day–care ward. Health & Place, 60, Article 102211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102211.
43.
WakkaryR., & MaestriL. (2008). Aspects of everyday design: Resourcefulness, adaptation, and emergence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(5), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802142276