An apartment is commonly seen as a place. Accepting it as a process, the act of creating and performing interiors becomes a collaborative flow involving designers, makers, and users. Simon Woodroffe, British entrepreneur, recognized what the dynamic performance spaces of the theater could bring to the design of residential interiors and in 2012 he launched YO! Home—his reconceptualization of the city center apartment, drawing on the mechanisms of stage design to create fluid and changeable interiors. The ability to create a number of credible interactive environments from a single cubic space offers much potential to design interiors that are responsive to the multiple daily needs of inhabitants, especially those who need to optimize every centimeter of space. YO! Home promotes a reappraisal of the role of design in relation to the expressive and transformative possibilities of an apartment interior at the stage of material conception. In so doing it demonstrates the possibility to provide homes for more people within the same residential footprint, but also that those “shoebox dwellers” can get a lot more interior for their space. In this paper, I draw on Castells’ concept of the space of flows as both metaphor and provocateur to help question the design of interiors that are shaped by the flows of inhabitants, and how these flows manifest in the prototype of YO! Home.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronsonA. (2005). Looking into the Abyss: Essays on scenography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
AttfieldJ. (1999). Bringing modernity home: Open plan in the British domestic interior. In CieraadI. (Ed.), At home: An anthropology of domestic space (pp. 73–82). New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
3.
BattyM. A. (2013). The new science of cities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
BeecherM. A. (1998). Toward a critical approach to the history of interiors. Journal of Interior Design, 24(2), 4–11.
5.
BremridgeW. (2012). Simon's home truths. Estates Gazette, September 22, 2012, 58–61.
6.
BurianJ. (1970). Josef Svoboda: Theatre artist in an age of science. Educational Theatre Journal, 22(2), 123–145.
7.
BurianJ. (1971). The scenography of Josef Svoboda. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
8.
Burn–CallanderR. (2014). YO! Sushi founder builds up to pioneering pre–fab flats. The Telegraph, May 4, 2014.
9.
CastellsM. (1989). The information city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban–regional process. New York, NY: Blackwell.
10.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
11.
CastellsM. (2004). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: A theoretical blueprint. In CastellsM. (Ed.), The network society: A cross–cultural perspective. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
DelalexG. (2006). Go with the flow. Helsinki, Finland: Publication Series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki.
15.
DowneyG. (2013). Introduction. In DowneyG. (Ed.), Domestic interiors: Representing homes from the Victorians to the moderns (pp. 1–12). London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
16.
DubosR. (1972). A god within. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
StalderF. (1998). The network society: Social formations in an age of information. Information Society, 14(4), 1–7. Retrieved December 2, 2014, from http://felix.openflows.com/html/netparadigm.html.
46.
StalderF. (2006). Manuel Castells and the theory of the network society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
47.
TaylorM. (1973). User needs or exploited needs. Architectural Design, 11, 728–732.
