R. C. Green et al. for the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, “ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome sequencing,”Genetics in Medicine15, no. 7 (2013): 565–574; AllyseM.MichieM., “Not-So-Incidental Findings: The ACMG Recommendations on the Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing,”Trends in Biotechnololgy31, no. 8 (2013): 439–441; BurkeW., “Recommendations for Returning Genomic Incidental Findings? We Need to Talk!”Genetics in Medicine15, no. 11 (2013): 854–859.
2.
BrothersK. B., “Practical Guidance on Informed Consent for Pediatric Participants in a Biorepository,”Mayo Clinic Proceedings89, no. 11 (2014): 1471–1480.
3.
United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (1978), at Appendix, no. 2, available at <http://hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html> (last visited April 17, 2015).
4.
MolyneuxC. S., “‘Even If They Ask You to Stand by a Tree All Day, You Will Have To Do It (laughter)…!’: Community Voices on the Notion and Practice of Informed Consent for Biomedical Research in Developing Countries,”Social Science & Medicine61, no. 2 (2005): 443–54.
5.
Arambula SolomonT. G.RandallL. L., Conducting Health Research with Native American Communities (Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association, 2014): at 203.
6.
BruggeD., “Susceptibility of Elderly Asian Immigrants to Persuasion with Respect to Participation in Research,”Journal of Immigrant Health7, no. 2 (2005): 93–101.
7.
BowmanK. W.SingerP. A., “Chinese Seniors' Perspectives on End-of-Life Decisions,”Social Science & Medicine53, no. 4 (2001): 455–464.
8.
MatsumuraS., “Acculturation of Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care: A Cross-Cultural Survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese,”Journal of General Internal Medicine17, no. 7 (2002): 531–539.
KwakJ.HaleyW. E., “Current Research Findings on End-of-Life Decision Making among Racially or Ethnically Diverse Groups,”Gerontologist45, no. 5 (2005): 634–641.
12.
SchwedeL., Complex Ethnic Households in America (Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005): at 74.
13.
ReardonJ., Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2009): At 98–125.
14.
MelloM.WolfL., “The Havasupai Indian Tribe Case—Lessons for Research Involving Stored Biologic Samples,”New England Journal of Medicine363, no. 3 (2010): 204–207.
15.
JonsenA. R.SieglerM.WinsladeW. J., Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine (United States: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2010): at 87.
16.
BuchananA. E.BrockD. W., Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1990): At 136–138.
17.
FadimanA., The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1997): At 70–71.
18.
KleinL. F.AckermanL. A., Women and Power in Native North America (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1995): At 12–14.
19.
HamiltonS., The Two-Headed Household: Gender and Rural Development in the Ecuadorean Andes (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998): At 92–98.
20.
HiratsukaV. Y., “Alaska Native People's Perceptions, Understandings, and Expectations for Research Involving Biological Specimens,”International Journal of Circumpolar Health71, no. 18642 (2012), available at <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417706/> (last visited August 17, 2015).
21.
BusehA., “Knowledge, Group-Based Medical Mistrust, Future Expectations, and Perceived Disadvantages of Medical Genetic Testing: Perspectives of Black African Immigrants/Refugees,”Public Health Genomics17, no. 1 (2014): 33–42.
22.
R. James et al., for the Kiana Group, “Exploring Pathways to Trust: A Tribal Perspective on Data Sharing,”Genetics in Medicine16, no. 11 (2014): 820–826; BeskowL. M., “Offering Aggregate Results to Participants in Genomic Research: Opportunities and Challenges,”Genetics in Medicine14, no. 4 (2012): 490–496.
23.
HalversonC. M.RossL. F., “Incidental Findings of Therapeutic Misconception in Biobank-Based Research,”Genetics in Medicine14, no. 6 (2012): 611–615.
24.
JarvikG. P., “Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices in Between,”American Journal of Human Genetics94, no. 6 (2014): 818–826.
25.
MilnerL. C., “Relationships Matter: Ethical Considerations for Returning Results to Family Members of Deceased Subjects,”American Journal of Bioethics13, no. 10 (2013): 66–67.
26.
ClineS., Lifting the Taboo: Women, Death and Dying (United Kingdom: Little, Brown Book Group Limited., 1995): At 62.
27.
Cruz BegayR., “Navajo Birth: A Bridge Between the Past and the Future,” in SelinH.StoneP., eds., Childbirth across Cultures (Netherlands: Springer, 2009): At 245–254.
28.
BashD. M., “Jewish Religious Practices Related to Childbearing,”Journal of Nurse-Midwifery25, no. 5 (1980): 39–42.
29.
ArvisoL. A.Van PeltE. C., The Scalpel and the Silver Bear: The First Navajo Woman Surgeon Combines Western Medicine and Traditional Healing (New York: Bantam Books, 1999): At 66.
SahotaP. C., “Body Fragmentation: Native American Community Members' Views on Specimen Disposition in Biomedical/Genetics Research,”AJOB Empirical Bioethics5, no. 3 (2014): 19–30.
32.
See Cline, supra note 26.
33.
See Diatz, supra note 30.
34.
GreenR. C.BergJ. S.GrodyW. W., “ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing,”Genetics in Medicine15, no. 7 (2013): 565–574.
HarmonA., “Indian Tribe Wins Fight to Limit Research of Its DNA,”New York Times, April 22, 2010, available at <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/us/22dna.html> (last visited April 17, 2015).
37.
WiwcharD., “Nuu-Chah-Nulth Blood Returns to West Coast,”Ha-Shilth-Sa Newspaper (2004): 1–3; DaltonR., “Tribe Blasts ‘Exploitation’ of Blood Samples,”Nature420, no. 6912 (2002): 111.