McCulloughL. B., “An Ethical Framework for the Responsible Leadership of Accountable Care Organizations,”American Journal of Medical Quality27, no. 3 (2012): 189–194.
2.
ChervenakF. A., “Clinical Guides to Preventing Ethical Conflict between Pregnant Women and Their Physicians,”American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology162, no. 2 (1990): 303–307.
3.
RileyB. D., “Essential Elements of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment, Counseling, and Testing: Updated Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors,”Journal of Genetic Counseling21, no. 2 (2012): 151–161.
AllenN. L., “Biobank Participants' Preferences for Disclosure of Genetic Research Results: Perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity Project,”Mayo Clinic Proceedings89, no. 6 (2014): 738–746.
10.
OrmondroydE., “Disclosure of Genetics Research Results after the Death of the Patient Participant: A Qualitative Study of the Impact on Relatives,”Journal of Genetic Counseling16, no. 4 (2007): 527–538.
11.
FernandezC. V., “Attitudes of Parents toward the Return of Targeted and Incidental Genomic Research Findings in Children,”Genetics in Medicine16, no. 8 (2014): 633–640.
12.
WangL. L., “Clinical Manifestations in a Cohort of 41 Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Patients,”American Journal of Medical Genetics102, no. 1 (2001): 11–17.
13.
CuminI., “Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome and Osteosarcoma,”Medical and Pediatric Oncology26, no. 6 (1996): 414–416; LeonardA., “Osteogenic Sarcoma in the Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome,”Medical and Pediatric Oncology26, no. 4 (1996): 249–253; GreenJ. S., “Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Complicated by Osteosarcoma,”Pediatric Radiology28, no. 1 (1998): 48–50.
WangL. L., “Association between Osteosarcoma and Deleterious Mutations in the RECQL4 Gene in Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome,”Journal of the National Cancer Institute95, no. 9 (2003): 669–674.
16.
SanchiniV., “Informed Consent as an Ethical Requirement in Clinical Trials: An Old, But Still Unresolved Issue. An Observational Study to Evaluate Patient's Informed Consent Comprehension,”Journal of Medical Ethics40, no. 4 (2014): 269–275.
17.
ScollonS., “Obtaining Informed Consent for Clinical Tumor and Germline Exome Sequencing of Newly Diagnosed Childhood Cancer Patients,”Genome Medicine6, no. 9 (2014): 69.
18.
YangY., “Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Mendelian Disorders,”New England Journal of Medicine369, no. 16 (2013): 1502–1511.
19.
WassermanJ. D., “Prevalence and Functional Consequence of TP53 Mutations in Pediatric Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Children's Oncology Group Study,”Journal of Clinical Oncology33, no. 6 (2015): 602–609.
20.
ZawatiM. H., “The Best Interests of the Child and the Return of Results in Genetic Research: International Comparative Perspectives,”BMC Medical Ethics15 (2014): 72.
21.
Id. citing RossL. F., “Technical Report: Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children,”Genetics in Medicine15, no. 3 (2013): 234–245.
22.
AvardD., “Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics39, no. 4 (2011): 593–604, at 601.
23.
Id.
24.
ChanB., “Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results from Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives,”American Journal of Bioethics12, no. 10 (2012): 1–8; JarvikG. P., “Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices in Between,”American Journal of Human Genetics94, no. 6 (2014): 818–826.
25.
Zawati, supra note 20; ClaytonE. W., “Addressing the Ethical Challenges in Genetic Testing and Sequencing of Children,”American Journal of Bioethics14, no. 3 (2014): 3–9.
26.
McGuireA. L., “Returning Genetic Research Results: Study Type Matters,”Personalized Medicine10, no. 1 (2013): 27–34.
27.
WolfS. M., “Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings: Facing the Challenges of Translational Science,”Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics14 (2013): 557–577.