EcksteinL.GarrettJ. R.BerkmanB. E., “A Framework for Analyzing the Ethics of Disclosing Genetic Research Findings,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics42, no. 2 (2014): 190–207; JohnsonL. M.ChurchC. L.WalshM. F.BakerJ. N., “Clinically Significant? Depends on Whom You Ask,”American Journal of Bioethics12, no. 10 (2012): 18–20; BredenoordA. L.KroesH. Y.CuppenE.ParkerM.Van DeldenJ. J., “Disclosure of Individual Genetic Data to Research Participants: The Debate Reconsidered,”Trends in Genetics27, no. 2 (2011): 41–47; ForsbergJ. S.HanssonM. G.ErikssonS., “Changing Perspectives in Biobank Research: From Individual Rights to Concerns about Public Health Regarding the Return of Results,”European Journal of Human Genetics17, no. 12 (2009): 1544–1549; MillerF. A.ChristensenR.GiacominiM.RobertJ. S., “Duty to Disclose What? Querying the Putative Obligation to Return Research Results to Participants,”Journal of Medical Ethics34, no. 3 (2008): 210–213; ShalowitzD. I.MillerF. G., “The Search for Clarity in Communicating Research Results to Study Participants,”Journal of Medical Ethics34, no. 9 (2008): E17.
2.
MilnerL. C.LiuE. Y.GarrisonN. A., “Relationships Matter: Ethical Considerations for Returning Results to Family Members of Deceased Subjects,”American Journal of Bioethics13, no. 10 (2013): 66–67; RothsteinM. A., “Should Researchers Disclose Results to Descendants?”American Journal of Bioethics13, no. 10 (2013): 64–65; ChanB.FacioF. M.EidemH.HullS. C.BieseckerL. G.BerkmanB. E., “Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives,”American Journal of Bioethics12, no. 10 (2012): 1–8; OrmondroydE.MoynihanC.WatsonM.FosterC.DavollsS.Ardern-JonesA.EelesR., “Disclosure of Genetics Research Results After the Death of the Patient Participant: A Qualitative Study of the Impact on Relatives,”Journal of Genetic Counseling16, no. 4 (2007): 527–538; OrmondroydE.MoynihanC.Ardern-JonesA.EelesR.FosterC.DavollsS.WatsonM., “Communicating Genetics Research Results to Families: Problems Arising When the Patient Participant is Deceased,”Psychooncology17, no. 8 (2008): 804–811; TasséA. M., “The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics39, no. 4 (2011): 621–630; TasséA. M., “Biobanking and Deceased Persons,”Human Genetics130, no. 3 (2011): 415–423.
3.
L. G. Dressler, S. Smolek, R. Ponsaran, J. M. Markey, H. Starks, N. Gerson, S. Lewis, N. Press, E. Juengst, and G. L. Wiesner for the GRRIP Consortium, “IRB Perspectives on the Return of Individual Results from Genomic Research,”Genetics in Medicine14, no. 2 (2012): 215–222; CollinsC.K.FernandezC. V., “Offering Results to Research Subjects: U.S. Institutional Review Board Policy,”Accountability in Research14, no. 4 (2007): 255–267; SimonC.ShinkunasL. A.BrandtD.WilliamsJ. K., “Individual Genetic and Genomic Research Results and the Tradition of Informed Consent: Exploring US Review Board Guidance,”Journal of Medical Ethics38, no. 7 (2012): 417–422; SimonC. M.WilliamsJ. K.ShinkunasL.BrandtD.Daack-HirschS.DriessnackM., “Informed Consent and Genomic Incidental Findings: IRB Chair Perspectives,”Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics6, no. 4 (2011): 53–67.
4.
McWilliamsR. R.WiebenE. D.RabeK. G.PedersenK. S.WuY.SicotteH.PetersenG. M., “Prevalence of CDKN2A Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Patients: Implications for Genetic Counseling,”European Journal of Human Genetics19, no. 4 (2011): 472–478.
5.
GordonE. J.PhilpottS., “The Convergence of Research and Clinical Practice: Institutional Review Board Review of Humanitarian Use Device Applications,”Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics3, no. 4 (2008): 81–98; RipleyE.MacrinaF.MarkowitzM.GenningsC., “Why Do We Pay? A National Survey of Investigators and IRB Chairpersons,”Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics5, no. 3 (2010): 43–56; WagnerT. H.MurrayC.GoldbergJ.AdlerJ. M.AbramsJ., “Costs and Benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board,”Journal of Clinical Oncology28, no. 4 (2010): 662–666; LargentE. A.GradyC.MillerF. G.WertheimerA., “Money, Coercion, and Undue Inducement: Attitudes About Payments to Research Participants,”IRB34, no. 1 (2012): 1–8; BeskowL. M.NameyE. E.MillerP. R.NelsonD. K.CooperA., “IRB Chairs' Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment,”IRB34, no. 3 (2012): 1–10 [hereinafter Beskow 2012A]; BeskowL. M.CheckD. K.NameyE. E.DameL. A.LinL.CooperA.WeinfurtK. P.WolfL. E., “Institutional Review Boards' Use and Understanding of Certificates of Confidentiality,”PLoS One7, no. 9 (2012): E44050; CritesJ. S.HarterT. D.FurmanL. M.DalyB. J., “Payment to Participants in Pediatric Research: Variation in IRB Members' Attitudes,”IRB35, no. 5 (2013): 9–13.
ShalowitzD. I.MillerF. G., “Communicating the Results of Clinical Research to Participants: Attitudes, Practices, and Future Directions,”PLoS Medicine5, no. 5 (2008): E91.
8.
BeskowL. M.BurkeW.FullertonS. M.SharpR. R., “Offering Aggregate Results to Participants in Genomic Research: Opportunities and Challenges,”Genetics in Medicine14, no. 4 (2012): 490–496.
9.
WolfS. M., “Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings: Facing the Challenges of Translational Science,”Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics14, no. 4 (2013): 557–577.
10.
BledsoeM. J.ClaytonE. W.McGuireA. L.GrizzleW. E.O'RourkeP. P.ZepsN., “Return of Research Results from Genomic Biobanks: Cost Matters,”Genetics in Medicine15, no. 2 (2013): 103–105; BlackL.AvardD.ZawatiM. H.KnoppersB. M.HebertJ.SauvageauG., “Funding Considerations for the Disclosure of Genetic Incidental Findings in Biobank Research,”Clinical Genetics84, no. 5 (2013): 397–406.
11.
WolfS. M.LawrenzF. P.NelsonC. A.KahnJ. P.ChoM. K.ClaytonE. W.FletcherJ. G.GeorgieffM. K.HammerschmidtD.HudsonK.IllesJ.KapurV.KeaneM. A.KoenigB. A.LeroyB. S.McFarlandE. G.ParadiseJ.ParkerL. S.TerryS. F.Van NessB.WilfondB. S., “Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 219–248; FabsitzR. R.McGuireA.SharpR. R.PuggalM.BeskowL. M.BieseckerL. G.BookmanE.BurkeW.BurchardE. G.ChurchG.ClaytonE. W.EckfeldtJ. H.FernandezC. V.FisherR.FullertonS. M.GabrielS.GachupinF.JamesC.JarvikG. P.KittlesR.LeibJ. R.O'DonnellC.O'RourkeP. P.RodriguezL. L.SchullyS. D.ShuldinerA. R.SzeR. K.ThakuriaJ. V.WolfS. M.BurkeG. L., “Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines from A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group,”Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics3, no. 6 (2010): 574–580; WolfS. M.CrockB. N.Van NessB.LawrenzF.KahnJ. P.BeskowL. M.ChoM. K.ChristmanM. F.GreenR. C.HallR.IllesJ.KeaneM.KnoppersB. M.KoenigB. A.KohaneI. S.LeroyB.MaschkeK. J.McGeveranW.OssorioP.ParkerL. S.PetersenG. M.RichardsonH. S.ScottJ. A.TerryS. F.WilfondB. S.WolfW. A., “Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks and Archived Data Sets,”Genetics in Medicine14, no. 4 (2012): 361–384; BookmanE. B.Din-LovinescuC.WorrallB. B.ManolioT. A.BennettS. N.LaurieC.MirelD. B.DohenyK. F.AndersonG. L.WehrK.WeinshilboumR.ChenD. T., “Incidental Genetic Findings in Randomized Clinical Trials: Recommendations from the Genomics and Randomized Trials Network (GARNET),”Genome Medicine5, no. 1 (2013): 7; Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing (2012), available at <http://bioethics.gov/node/764> (last visited August 3, 2015); KnoppersB. M.DeschenesM.ZawatiM. H.TasséA. M., “Population Studies: Return of Research Results and Incidental Findings Policy Statement,”European Journal of Human Genetics21, no. 3 (2013): 245–247; Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, Framework on the Feedback of Health-Related Findings in Research, available at <http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp056059.pdf> (last visited August 2, 2015); JarvikG. P.AmendolaL. M.BergJ. S.BrothersK.ClaytonE. W.ChungW.EvansB. J.EvansJ. P.FullertonS. M.GallegoC. J.GarrisonN. A.GrayS. W.HolmI. A.KulloI. J.LehmannL. S.McCartyC.ProwsC. A.RehmH. L.SharpR. R.SalamaJ.SandersonS.Van DriestS. L.WilliamsM. S.WolfS. M.WolfW. A.BurkeW., “Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices in Between,”American Journal of Human Genetics94, no. 6 (2014): 818–826.
12.
See Dressler, supra note 3; Beskow 2012A, supra note 5.
13.
See Wolf, supra note 11; Fabsitz, supra note 11; Wolf, supra note 11; Bookman, supra note 11; Knoppers, supra note 11; Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, supra note 11; Jarvik, supra note 11; Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, “Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-To-Consumer Contexts” (2013), available at <http://bioethics.gov/node/3183> (last visited September 25, 2015).
14.
See Dressler, supra note 3.
15.
Id.; KeaneM. A., “Institutional Review Board Approaches to the Incidental Findings Problem,”Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics36, no. 2 (2008): 352–355; WolfS. M.KahnJ. P.LawrenzF. P.NelsonC. A., “The Incidentalome,”JAMA296, no. 23 (2006): 2800–2801; Author Reply 2801–2802; BeskowL. M., “Considering the Nature of Individual Research Results,”American Journal of Bioethics6, no. 6 (2006): 38–40; Author Reply W10–32.
16.
WolfS. M.BurkeW.KoenigB. A., “Mapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics43, no. 3 (2015): 486–501.
17.
FernandezC. V.O'RourkeP. P.BeskowL. M., “Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics43, no. 3 (2015): 514–522.
18.
Radecki BreitkopfC.PetersenG. M.WolfS. M.ChaffeeK. G.RobinsonM. E.GordonD. R.LindorN. M.KoenigB. A., “Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including After Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics43, no. 3 (2015): 464–475.
19.
WolfS. M., “Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics43, no. 3 (2015): 440–463.