ZinnerD. E.Bolcic-JankovicD.ClarridgeB.BlumenthalD.CampbellE. G., “Participation of Academic Scientists in Relationships with Industry,”Health Affairs28, no. 6 (2009): 1814–1825; MenachemiN.MorriseyM. A.GinterP. M., “Outside Consulting Income by University Faculty in Health Administration,”Journal of Health Administration Education27, no. 4 (2010): 297–310.
2.
Id. (Zinner).
3.
MowattG. L.ShirranJ. M.GrimshawD.RennieA.FlanaginV.YankG.MacLennanP. C.GotzscheP. C.BeroL. A., “Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews,”JAMA287, no. 21 (2002): 2769–2771; PsatyB. M.RennieD., “Clinical Trial Investigators and Their Prescribing Patterns: Another Dimension to the Relationship between Physician Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry,”JAMA299, no. 23 (2006): 1813–1817.
4.
United States Senate Committee on Finance, Use of Educational Grants by Pharmaceutical Manufacturers (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, April 2007); United States Senate Committee on Finance Minority Staff Report, Ghostwriting in Medical Literature (U.S. Washington, D.C.: Senate Committee on Finance, June 2010); United States General Accounting Office (now the U.S. Government Accountability Office), HHS Direction Needed to Address Financial Conflicts of Interest, Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Public Health, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate (Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office, 2001); Medicare Payment Advisory Committee (MedPAC), Public Reporting of Physicians' Financial Relationships with Drug and Device Manufacturers, Hospitals, and ASCs, MedPAC public meeting, March 5, 2008 (Washington, D.C.: MedPAC, 2008).
5.
RossJ. S.HillK. P.EgilmanD. S.KrumholzH. M., “Guest Authorship and Ghost-Writing in Publications Related to Rofecoxib: A Case Study of Industry Documents from Rofexocib Litigation,”JAMA299, no. 15 (2008): 1800–1812; HillK. P.RossJ. S.EgilmanD. S.KrumholzH. M., “The ADVANTAGE Seeding Trial: A Review of Internal Documents,”Annals of Internal Medicine149, no. 4 (2008): 251–258.
6.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009): At 6.
7.
LiangB. A.MackeyT., “Confronting Conflict: Addressing Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Academic Medical Centers,”American Journal of Law & Medicine36, no. 1 (2010): 136–187; ShimD. S.SpenceR. G., “Industry Reimbursement for Entering Patients into Clinical Trials: Legal and Ethical Issues,”Annals of Internal Medicine115, no.2 (1991): 148–151.
8.
DickersinK., “The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence,”JAMA263, no. 10 (1990): 1385–1389.
9.
SchulmanK. A.RubensteinL. E.GlickH. A.EisenbergJ. M., “Relationships between Sponsors and Investigators in Pharmacoeconomic and Clinical Research,”Pharmacoeconomics7, no. 3 (1995): 206–220; BlumenthalD.CampbellE. G.AndersonM. S.CausinoN.LouisK. S., “Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty,”JAMA277, no. 15 (1997): 1224–1228; WiseJ., “Research Suppressed for Seven Years by Drug Company,”BMJ314, no. 7088 (1997): 1145.
10.
WeatherallD., “Problems for Biomedical Research at the Academia-Industrial Interface,”Science and Engineering Ethics9, no. 1 (2003): 43–48.
11.
BlumenthalD., “Doctors and Drug Companies,”New England Journal of Medicine351, no. 18 (2004): 1885–1890; AngellM., “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?”New England Journal of Medicine342, no. 20 (2000): 1516–1518; BodenheimerT., “Uneasy Alliance: Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry,”New England Journal of Medicine342, no. 20 (2000): 1539–1544.
12.
See Schulman, supra note 9; MelloM. M.ClarridgeB. R.StuddertD. M., “Academic Medical Centers' Standards for Clinical-Trial Agreements with Industry,”New England Journal of Medicine352, no. 21 (2005): 2202–2210.
13.
LipsitchM., “The Hidden Risk to Academic Freedom in Corporate Consulting Contracts,”Chronicle of Higher Education, June 27, 2010 [cited August 22, 2014], available at <http://chronicle.com/article/The-Hidden-Risk-to-Academic/66050/> (last visited April 29, 2015).
14.
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 563 U.S. No. 09–1159.
15.
See Lipsitch, supra note 13.
16.
Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research for which PHS Funding is Sought. 42 C.F.R. Part 50, Subpart F (2011) [cited August 22, 2014].
17.
Association of American Medical Colleges, Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research, Protecting Subjects, Preserving Trust, Promoting Progress – Policy and Guidelines for the Oversight of Individual Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research, Washington, D.C., December 2001, available at <https://www.aamc.org/download/75302/data> (last visited April 29, 2015).
18.
See Institute of Medicine, supra note 6.
19.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Updated 2010 [cited August 22, 2014],”available at <http://www.icmje.org/> (last visited April 29, 2015).
20.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare, Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Programs, Transparency Reports and Reporting of Physician Ownership or Investment Interests, 42 CFR 402, 42CFR 403 CMS-2011-0191, Washington, D.C., 2013 [cited August 22, 2014], available at <https://federalregister.gov/a/2013–02572> (last visited April 29, 2015).
See Association of American Medical Colleges, supra note 17.
23.
American Association of University Professors, Recommended Principles to Guide Academic-Industry Relations (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2014).
LindstoneH.TurloffM., The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications (London: Addison Wesley, 1975); AdlerM.ZiglioE., Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1996).
26.
MinterR. M.AngelosP.CoimbraR.DaleP.de VeraM. E.HardacreJ., “Ethical Management of Conflict of Interest: Proposed Standards for Academic Surgical Societies,”Journal of the American College of Surgeons213, no. 5 (2011): 677–682.
27.
SmithD., “Establishing National Priorities for Australian Occupational Health and Safety Research,”Journal of Occupational Health52, no. 4 (2010): 241–248; MoscoviceI.ArmstrongP.ShortellS.BennettR., “Health Services Research for Decision-Makers: The Use of the Delphi Technique to Determine Health Priorities,”Journal of Health Politics Policy & Law2, no. 3 (1977): 388–310.
28.
PincusT.MilesC.FroudR.UnderwoodM.CarnesD.TaylorS. J. C., “Methodological Criteria for the Assessment of Moderators in Systematic Reviews of Randomised Controlled Trials: A Consensus Study,”BMC Medical Research Methodology11, no. 14 (2011), available at <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2288/11/14> (last visited May 8, 2015).
29.
BanksD. E.ShiR.McLartyJ.CowlC. T.SmithD.TarloS. M., “American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement on the Respiratory Health Effects of Asbestos,”Chest135, no. 6 (2009): 169–127; De VosE.SpivakH.Hatmaker-FlaniganE.SegeR. D., “A Delphi Approach to Reach Consensus on Primary Care Guidelines Regarding Youth Violence Prevention,”Pediatrics118, no. 4 (2006): e1109–e1115; AkinsR. B., “A Process-Centered Tool for Evaluating Patient Safety Performance and Guiding Strategic Improvement,” in HenriksenK.BattlesJ. B.MarksE. S.LewinD. I., eds., Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products (Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005); HawryluckL. A.HarveyW. R.Lemieux-CharlesL.SingerP. A., “Consensus Guidelines on Analgesia and Sedation in Dying Intensive Care Patients,”BMC Medical Ethics3, no. 3 (2002): E3.
United Nations International Development Organization, Kerstin Cuhls, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (DE), The Delphi Method, citing WechslerW., Delphi-Methode, Gestaltung und Potential für betriebliche Prognoseprozesse, Schriftenreihe Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Forschung und Entwicklung, München (1978) [cited August 22, 2014], available at <http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/16959_DelphiMethod.pdf> (last visited April 29, 2015).
32.
See AdlerZiglio, supra note 25.
33.
BrownB. B., Delphi Process: A Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinion of Experts (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 1968).
34.
MelloM. M.MurtaghL.JoffeS.TaylorP. L.GreenbergY.CampbellE. G., “Beyond Financial Conflicts of Interest: Institutional Oversight of Faculty Consulting Agreements at Schools of Medicine and Public Health,” Working Paper, September 18, 2014.
35.
See Mello, supra note 12.
36.
See Mello, supra note 34.
37.
ChimonasS.EvartsS. D.LittlehaleS. K.RothmanD. J., “Managing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Care: The ‘Race to the Middle’ at U.S. Medical Schools,”Academic Medicine88, no. 10 (2013): 1464–1470.